civic
Well-known member
The gospel is Gods grace for all.It really has nothing to do with that. as much as Flowers wants to equivocate what grace means.
The wrong pillar of Calvinist is Irresistible Grace and not TD or inability.
The gospel is Gods grace for all.It really has nothing to do with that. as much as Flowers wants to equivocate what grace means.
The wrong pillar of Calvinist is Irresistible Grace and not TD or inability.
The gospel is Gods grace for all.
So what you get from the passage with the parable is that irresistible grace is wrong? How did you arrive at that conclusion?
The gospel yep. And Leighton agrees it’s the gospel which brings grace that can be received by all. It’s Gods means.Mhm.
And grace is not "inherent goodness and ability," grace is the unmerited favor of God given us through Christ.
The gospel yep. And Leighton agrees it’s the gospel which brings grace that can be received by all. It’s Gods means.
Nope he affirms grace precedes from God through the gospel. It’s the biblical model used by all the Apostles. They preached the gospel by which we are saved period.He equivocates a ton and doublespeaks just as much as any good Calvinist to hide his views about inability.
Jesus said "Without me you can do nothing."
That settles the issue, that's what God's Word says, inability is Biblical.
He makes grace to mean some kind of intellectual information concerning a message, instead of an inward change.
Nope he affirms grace precedes from God through the gospel. It’s the biblical model used by all the Apostles. They preached the gospel by which we are saved period.
I listen to him often and on his FB group. I know what he teaches and how he gets misrepresented. Just like the Arminian do with Calvinists and Calvinists with Arminians .You are completely wrong and I have proof in what he said.
So keep living in your unreality dream world and spamming smiles to feel better about yourself.
I will have to disagree with you thereIt really has nothing to do with that. as much as Flowers wants to equivocate what grace means.
The wrong pillar of Calvinist is Irresistible Grace and not TD or inability.
I will have to disagree with you there
if God has to harden men to prevent belief then clearly the capability for belief is there
and that is contrary to total inability.
Apparently you do not understand that total inability states men must be regenerated before they can believeNo, you're just flat out wrong, that doesn't logically follow.
It's like Flowers was a hammer just looking around for a nail to pound Calvinism with no matter what.
You can't assume grace was never working in these people's lives since birth.
It's a complete non sequitur argument!
No, I just have to put it in context. It is speaking of bearing fruit not believing the gospelScripture is CRYSTAL clear about total inability.
Jesus said apart from him we can do NOTHING.
You are in rebellion if you refuse to accept that.
ExactlyApparently you do not understand that total inability states men must be regenerated before they can believe
The doctrine is not satisfied unless regeneration is had
No, I just have to put it in context. It is speaking of bearing fruit not believing the gospel
I agree with the passages you quoted, but I disagree with your understanding and application of them.Im saying man by nature is governed in his mind by an evil nature and disposition Eph 2:2-3
2 Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience:
3 Among whom also we all had our conversation in times past in the lusts of our flesh, fulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the mind; and were by nature the children of wrath, even as others.
Our will wasnt free from that government, sorry
ditto as we see the isms coming out lol.I will have to disagree with you there
if God has to harden men to prevent belief then clearly the capability for belief is there
and that is contrary to total inability.
However, I also agree with you that irresistible grace is an error
I fully agree with you. Our Lord was speaking that we cannot live a Godly life without Him. The context of His statement was not meant to be all inclusive.No, I just have to put it in context. It is speaking of bearing fruit not believing the gospel
AmenI fully agree with you. Our Lord was speaking that we cannot live a Godly life without Him. The context of His statement was not meant to be all inclusive.
God Bless
Exactly. Calvinism often relies on out of context interpretations.I fully agree with you. Our Lord was speaking that we cannot live a Godly life without Him. The context of His statement was not meant to be all inclusive.
God Bless