Actually, they both do have errors, and I do not straight up defend Calvinism without showing where I do disagree with them.
The Truth
The truth distinguishes between unconditional and conditional aspects of God’s salvation, dividing between God’s work and our duty.
the first thing I would say is there is no conditional aspects of our salvation. We are guilty, under the penalty of sin, and nothing we can do will remove that judgment
Arminianism in its five points i
s totally rejected as unscriptural and blasphemous against the intentions and accomplishments of Christ. Man is
neither free nor able to cooperate with God for salvation (
John 3:3;
8:43,
47;
10:26;
Rom 8:7-8 I Cor 2:14;
Eph 2:1-3).
John 3: 3 Jesus makes a statement of fact. We must be born again. John 3: 10-18 Jesus answers Nicodemus' question about HOW we are born again. Whoever looks to the cross in faith. will never perish and has eternal life.
This required free will
John 8 - Major issue with this. He spoke of their desire. they rejected Jesus in unbelief. so as Jesus said in John 3, they are already condemned. The issue is, there is a good chance some of them repented later.
John 10 does not remove free will. The sheep still chose to follow him.
Rom 8 is about pleasing God. We are not saved by pleasing God.. an unsaved person can not please God.. All this says is that the unsaved can not do any good works.. Not that they can not chose to receive Gods grace gift.
1 cor 2. Yes, they can not receive the things of God. Unless God intervenes. which he does. The HS convicts the world of sin righteousness and judgment. its why when they stand in front of God on judgment day they will be cast out. Because the spirit helped to so they could chose. and they rejected him.
eph 2 is troublesome for the fatalist
1. Paul said in chapter one a person is given the HS after they hear and believe
2. It is sad that we would stop at vs 3 in eph 2. Because Paul continues
even
when we were dead in trespasses, made us alive together with Christ (by grace you have been saved), 6 and raised
us up together, and made
us sit together in the heavenly
places in Christ Jesus,
He repeats the same thing, then says how we were made alive (by grace)
then as we continue, In vs 8, he says this saving action was by Grace, But through faith.
so free will again in chapter 1 and chapter 2 is assured.
also. we do not cooperate with God. this is some Calvinist reasoning. there is 2 people laying in a wrecked care, trapped with no way to get out. Both have suffered fatal wounds, and are in need of rescue
God come to them, and offeres them both salvation.
the one says no tank you. I will save myself. or says he does not need Gods help he does not even believe in God
the other says yes God please save me
The one that was saved did not cooperate with the savior. he just allowed the savior to save him, He also did not work to earn his salvation. The rescuer did all the word.
God’s foreknowledge in election did not find any conditions met; it was of persons, not actions (
Psalm 14:1-3;
53:1-3;
Rom 8:29). Jesus Christ’s death accomplished salvation for His elect; it did not merely make it possible (
Matt 1:21 Rom 5:10;
Hebrews 9:15). The Holy Spirit’s work in applying salvation through regeneration is effectual and sure (
John 3:8;
Eph 1:19;
Titus 3:5;
I Pet 1:2). The elect cannot be lost nor separated from the purpose of God in salvation (
John 6:38-39;
Rom 8:28-39; 2nd
Timothy 2:16-19).
Christs death accomplish salvation for all mankind. But he will not force anyone to recieve it
Thats why condemnation is a result of unbelief (not sin) ths sin debt is paid.
Salvation can not be lost. because it can not be earned. You will never be good enough to earn salvation. so you can never be bad enough to unearn salvation. I have eternal life Not conditional life (eternal security(
Calvinism may be accepted in its first three points as scriptural and according to the truth of the gospel as preached by brother Paul.
I reject this notion. All 5 points of calvinism are unbiblical.
Man’s nature is totally corrupt since Eden, rendering him without desire or ability to know or please God in any way for salvation.
Again, One does not get saved by pleasing God. so to say they can not please God is a false pretense.
God’s election of some men to eternal life is based purely on the good pleasure of His will in spite of their foreseen evil rebellion. Jesus Christ died only for the elect, and He will not lose a single one of those that the Father gave Him to fully and finally redeem.
Based on his foreknowledge
God is a God of love. he can not tell us to love unconditionally all men, including our enemy, If God does not do that himself. which calvinism teaches that he does not love all men unconditionally.
However, Calvinism errs with its point of Irresistable Grace, for they apply it to the gospel and conversion, which is farther than truth. They apply irresistible grace, or what they name the “effectual call,” to the preaching of the gospel in the case of all the elect. They believe that all the elect will hear and believe the gospel sometime during their lives and cannot be saved without these things. This is sacramental salvation, for unless the “priest” carries the grace of God’s gospel to the elect, they cannot be saved without it. They must therefore invent all sorts of alternative theories to cover the salvation of infants, idiots, heathen, the deaf and blind, etc. Of course, they rarely define what they mean by “saving faith,” or they would make it to loose, or limit the elect to just a very few. The typical Calvinist, even John Calvin and Jonathan Edwards, seldom differentiate clearly between regeneration and conversion. God’s grace is definitely irresistible when it comes to regeneration, but conversion by the gospel depends on preacher and hearer. The first of the acts is God’s work in salvation, and the second is the information and news concerning it for the comfort of the elect. However, Calvinism errs with its point of Final Perseverance, for they end up with a fatalist doctrine of men incapable of backsliding. Persevering is man’s action. If God guarantees man’s perseverance, then he will continue in faith and good works without fail. This fatalistic doctrine, if logically followed, would render the New Testament epistles and the work of the ministry unnecessary. If by final perseverance the Calvinist means God will not lose any of His elect, then why not call it preservation like the Bible? God will preserve His saints so that not one will be lost and all make it safely to heaven, but He has not guaranteed their faithfulness.
Agree for the most part.
As I think I said earlier. I am probably a 3 point Arminian. But I reject both doctrinal thinking. and would rather just say I am a child of God.