There's always been plenty of threads for the proverbially third-wheelers.
But as a committed Classical Arminian, what problems do you find with it.
Glad to meet you. I will be honest I am not sure I have met to many arminians
To me I see that if anyone rejects OSAS. They are classified Arminians, If they REJECT NOSAS and believe in OSAS they are classified calvinist.
And then the debates go on and on and on.
When 99 percent of the time I have been involved. They are neither
I would probably be more arminian (I believe in unlimited atonement and
Armenians 5 points
Free will - totally agree
Conditional election - do not totally agree.. We are saved by grace, but through faith. So you could say faith is a condition. But when you make it a condition. It is something you must do to merit salvation
Universal redemption 0 Agree, jesus died for the world
Holy Spirit can be resisted. Agree. But nonsensical to me, only unless yoru arguing against a calvinist. As a believer I would not even consider this argument or how anyone could think otherwise.
Fall from grace (salvation can be lost) totally reject. Just as adamantly as I reject tht we can persevere to the end. Salvation can not be earned, thus it can not be lost. So to say we can lose it, is nonsensical. And to say we must persevere to keep it (ironically this is not what the calvinist believes. But this is what they say) is just as nonsensical
Thats wht I mean
Not everyone who believes in eternal security is a calvinist, and not everyone who believes salvation can be lost its an arminian