Naaman humbled himself by abandoning his arrogance, anger and rage and and being willing to do what Elisha said. He was on his way to his home (verse 11), so he had to turn around and go back. If that's not evidence of a change of heart, then I don't know what is. Also this is more than just changing his mine - it's a heart change. This change of heart preceded his return back to the Jordan river, just as salvation today precedes water baptism. If his heart had not changed, he would never have returned.
Salvation is not found in repentance. One can repent all day long, and still remain unwashed and condemned. Naaman was not cleansed when he turned. He was not cleansed when he entered Jordan. He was not cleansed when he dipped the first or the sixth time. He was cleansed when he dipped the seventh time; when he had completed the instruction he had received.
You said "he still did not believe it would work until it did." Really? Show me the scripture that says that?
2 Kings 5:15
"Then he returned to the man of God with all his company, and came and stood before him. And he said, “Behold, now I know that there is no God in all the earth, except in Israel"
You are mistaken, the lesson of Naaman is not only confined to his healing, but also to his renewed heart. You say it happened after he was healed. I say it happened when he decided to turn around. In fact, turning around is a good definition of repentance. I don't suppose either of us can prove our side, but at least I believe I have evidence. I don't see any evidence on your position.
I see what you are saying about his change of heart, and I agree with you, but as I said above, salvation is not found in repentance (although repentance leads to salvation). Salvation is found in our surrender of our will to God's will, and complete obedience to His commands. He has listed three actions that man must take to receive His salvation. You don't see the evidence in the story of Naaman because you are so set on your preconception that you are blinded to the truth.
Sure, all of God's promises come with a condition, sometimes some physical action. but the promise of salvation requires ONLY FAITH - no physical action is required for the reception of salvation. Obedience to do good works come after salvation.
Faith without action is not faith. If you only give intellectual assent then you are no better than the demons.
As I already stated, Galatians 3:27 is referring to salvation, being baptized by the Holy Spirit into Christ (or into the body of Christ 1 Corinthians 12:13), NOT water baptism. Verse 26 is saying the same thing: "For you are all sons of God through faith in Christ Jesus." (Notice it DOES NOT say "And baptism")
Water baptism, as I have shown many times, is the ONE baptism in the NT Church. Baptism that saves is an action that man must take (Matt 28:19, Acts 2:38). Baptism that saves requires water (1 Pet 3:21). Baptism that saves includes the actions of the Holy Spirit (Col 2:11-14). Baptism that saves is the point at which one dies to sin and is raised to new life in Christ (Rom 6:1-4).
Gal 3:26 does not need to say faith and baptism, because baptism is an act of faith that these people already understood (as can we through study of other passages of Scripture). We are baptized in water into Christ Jesus and the Holy Spirit enters our heart, cuts our sin from us, and makes us alive in Christ DURING water baptism.
Show you the passage that says people must be saved, at which time forgiveness of sins takes place, BEFORE they can be baptized??
You've been looking at them, but misinterpreting them ever since we started debating. You yourself have quoted them.
No passage of Scripture says that we are saved before we are baptized. Col 2 and Rom 6 both say that it is "in baptism" that we die to sin, our sins are cut from us, and we are united to Jesus' death and resurrection. "In baptism", not before.
The Ethiopian eunuch was required by Philip to "believe with all your heart" BEFORE he would baptized him. (Believing includes forgiveness of sins.)
No, believing does not include forgiveness of sins. Yes, he had to believe before he was baptized (else his baptism would have only gotten him wet with no salvation occurring). But his salvation occurred during his baptism as Phillip must have taught him when he was explaining Jesus to him.
Peter required the crowd on the day of Pentecost to repent (which includes forgiveness of sins and salvation) and AFTER that get baptized.
Repentance leads to salvation, but it is not the point at which salvation occurs (Rom 6, Col 2). Peter said,
"Repent, and each of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins...". "for" means in order to receive. And
"for the forgiveness of your sins" refers back to both "repent" and "be baptized". If it only refers to one of them, then it refers back to the most recent which is "be baptized".
Paul on the road to Damascus was blinded by a bright light by Jesus. He asked Jesus, "What shall I do Lord?", showing that he immediately repented and believed that Jesus was the Lord. His baptism happened 3 days AFTER he was saved.
And three days after he believed he was still sitting there in sin. Ananias told him,
"Get up and be baptized, and wash away your sins by calling on His name."
The Philippian jailer asked Paul, "What must I do to be saved?" Paul's answer was not "Get baptized". No, he said, "Believe in the Lord Jesus Christ, and you will be saved." AFTER that they preached the gospel to them. After that, they believed. After that they were baptized.
"Believed" comes from the Greek "pistis" which is faith. It is not intellectual assent, but the active, living faith described in James 2.
Philip preached to the Samaritans. "But when they believed Philip preaching the good news, they were being baptized. Even Simon himself believed; and after being baptized, ..." Belief, salvation, forgiveness of sins, preceded baptism.
You put it out of order. 1) Belief, 2a) repentance, 2b) confession of Jesus as Lord, 3) baptism which brings about forgiveness of sins and salvation.
"He who has believed and has been baptized shall be saved." What comes first, believing, which is salvation, or baptism? Jesus did not say, he who has been baptized and was born again during baptism shall be saved.
"Believes and is baptized", both must be accomplished for the result to occur.
As with the widow, gather bottles and pour the oil. If she just gathered the bottles but never poured the oil, there would not have been a miracle.
As with Naaman, dip in Jordan seven times. If he had dipped six times and given up, he would not have been cleansed.
"Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptized them in the name ..." What comes first, making disciples or baptism? Jesus did not say, he who is baptized and becomes a disciple (a believer) shall be saved.
This is the same event as Mark 16:16 told from a different perspective. Make disciples comes first because a disciple is a follower, a learner. A person can be a follower all their life and still not be saved (as evidenced by Jesus statement that "I never knew you" in Matt 7:21-23). But a person is saved, and moves from just a follower to being adopted when one is baptized into Christ.
Are you really so indoctrinated that you cannot see the obvious truth that salvation/forgiveness of sins/new birth always must occur BEFORE water baptism?
Indoctrinated? No. But I can read the Scriptures, and am lead by the indwelling of the Holy Spirit to understand His Word. I also understand your position and why you believe what you do. But you have a fundamental problem in understanding that faith is not an inactive, passive, mental only thing. Faith requires and encompasses the actions that Jesus said "lead to" receiving salvation. Without taking those actions that lead to salvation, salvation is not received.