As noted elsewhere, Calvinists cannot seem to get their heads around that.
Why are Calvinists so mean ?
- Thread starter civic
- Start date
civic
Active Member
I started a new thread specifically on this topic
ok
And you did not answer. The future is settled remember? Determine a long time ago. So what is it you would have God to do? Change the future?
Ahhh.....there ya go folks. God's foreknowledge is dependent on the foreseen choices of His creation. A clear violation of God's aseity.
Then it was not absolutely necessary.
Absolute it is knowledge not determination
You just cannot seem to grasp the difference
BTW aseity refers to that which is necessary for his existence.
It does not depend on what man does or does not do.
You misuse the term
civic
Active Member
Yes the continuation of the equivocating and conflating the words
Sorry but I did answer.
It appears you just did not understand what it means for god to be relational
Misdefining the term is prevalent in Calvinism
It appears you do not understand. All this is foreknown for certain. You could not choose not to believe. Your actually the fatalist.
Certain yes but not necessary.
In other words you could have chosen differently, and the foreknowledge would have been different
SO God's foreknowledge is dependent on my choices. A clear aseity violation. Classic example
sorry once again you mis-define the term.
God's self existence is not challenged by what man does or does not do.
civic
Active Member
Correct it’s a strawman
Calvinists mis-define the term
Biblelesson
Active Member
Anja
Active Member
We already knew you were a dinosaur Tom.
Last edited:
It is if His foreknowledge is dependent on your choices
civic
Active Member
Similar threads
