Is God a Narcissist in Calvinism ?

This from AI

The idea that Calvinism makes God a narcissist creating vessels of wrath for destruction is a common criticism, stemming from the doctrine of predestination, where God sovereignly chooses some for salvation (vessels of mercy) and leaves others to their sin (vessels of wrath) to display His justice and glory. While Calvinists assert God's glory requires revealing His attributes, including wrath, through the damned (Romans 9), critics argue this portrays God as unjust, tyrannical, or even the author of evil, contrasting it with Jesus's humble, other-directed nature. Defenders counter that God's glory isn't selfish narcissism but His inherent, perfect nature, and that His decree of reprobation is a passive "passing over," not an active creation of evil, serving His greater good.

The Criticism: God as Narcissist/Tyrant
  • Rigging the Game: Critics suggest God preordains everything, rigging history so people have no real choice, all to praise Himself, making Him seem like a self-centered "It's all about me" figure.
  • Author of Evil: Some argue that by ordaining sin and damnation, God becomes the ultimate cause of evil, a "moral monster" or "tyrant".
  • Unjust Damnation: How can God be just punishing those He foreordained for destruction, especially when He knew they'd end up damned but created them anyway
The Core Tension
  • God's Character vs. Human Understanding: The debate hinges on whether God's sovereign plan, focused on His glory, aligns with human concepts of justice, love, and fairness, with differing views on whether God causes sin or merely permits it for His higher purposes
Arguments that Calvinism Portrays a Narcissistic God

Critics argue that the God described in Calvinist theology meets the criteria for Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) as defined by the DSM-5.
  • Lack of Empathy: Critics claim that creating individuals specifically for destruction ("vessels of wrath") demonstrates a lack of empathy, treating humans as mere objects to "show off" divine power.
  • Grandiose Self-Importance: The biblical God's insistence on constant praise and the belief that the entire universe exists solely for His glory are seen by skeptics as hallmarks of grandiosity and an "appetite for applause".
  • Human-centric Narcissism: Some philosophers argue that any concept of God is inherently narcissistic because it presumes that an all-powerful creator would be "petty" enough to care about minute human behaviors
The question of whether creating "vessels of wrath" is unloving is a central conflict in Christian theology, with different traditions offering radically different interpretations.

1. The Argument for It Being Unloving
Critics argue that if God creates individuals knowing and decreeing their eternal destruction for His own glory, it contradicts the biblical assertion that "God is love" (1 John 4:8).
  • Lack of Redemptive Purpose: Some theologians argue that wrath and judgment can only be seen as "loving" if they serve a redemptive or corrective purpose; eternal destruction without hope for restoration appears purely punitive.
  • Predestined Despair: Critics of "double predestination" (the idea that God actively chooses who to damn) argue it makes the gospel "bad news" for the majority of humanity, portraying God as a deterministic "puppet master" rather than a loving father.

lets discuss

the idea of hell is already wrong in many ways.

command theory helps here, which says God acts out of His nature.


God's nature is intrinsically Good, His very nature containing no evil when He asks things of us or speaks to us.

He has no flesh mind. His Good and His Nature are not within the 'good and evil' dichotomy we see in the fallen type nature we suffer.
 
That wiki link includes too many side issues but basically what God commands is always the best and Good and of His very nature.

Some say in the OT sodom and gomorrah prove otherwise, such as marion hating God in the OT.

But sodom and gomorrah is 'to b', prophetic, of when the satanic realm is destroyed, and we are restored to paradise, which will all be very Good.... and reflects the demon nations, not earthly historical cities.

Yes the demons find destruction of their cities an evil prospect but they are God's and our enemy who brought about the fall... which event they found to be good according to their lesser 'nature.'

ethics implies a need to govern impulses. God doesn't need to govern Himself that way as His nature is Perfect, Love, Good. There is no impulse to rein in.
 
When God is angry, it is not an expression of a 'bad mood', it's because He loves and wants only good for us. As such His anger does not reflect double mindedness or a change of Nature, for all He does and commands is Exactly right.

The remnant as concept doesn't mean the rest of jacob goes to hell nonsense. But that's another topic though.
 
In extension command theory means that :
(points)

He created our home once. It was perfect and He spoke it and it needs no 'redoing'. Paradise will be restored. He does not need a new earth, but all His land for us, eden, restored (us back in it!) and this confirms His Original command, what He spoke, which He declared Good.

He is love and Will restore His souls to Him , every single one satan stole!, and restore us to our promised land (eden). He does not fail and give up on souls out of ego.

The very very very few not restored willfully choose that. God does not force us. The point is that those created by Him are of Him with His signature on us... any evil in us is not from Him. the soul therefore cannot be depraved in its very nature since its of Him. no tulip.

and many other points but too many to name.
 
God does not condemn His own sons and daughters

only the enemy realm, in enmity to us,
angers Him... because they hurt us.
He hates esau!
 
Back
Top Bottom