Why are Calvinists so mean ?

[civic]

Sorry as noted his existence is not threathened by knowing rather than determining the future.

yes he cannot make his case lol.

 

[TomL]

It does not have to be. He created it, it's His system.

Again no where stated in scripture

 

[TomL]

yes he cannot make his case lol.

He just assumes it.

 

[civic]

He just assumes it.

calvinism 101

 

[Presby02]

and tell us how it violates that God is self - existent, sufficient ?

If God's foreknowledge is dependent on your future choices then that violates His aseity.

 

[Presby02]

Again no where stated in scripture

Whose system is it then? Who is sovereign?

 

[Presby02]

Sorry as noted his existence is not threathened by knowing rather than determining the future.

Again, no one said threatened.

Your position is a clear violation of God's aseity.

 

[TomL]

If God's foreknowledge is dependent on your future choices then that violates His aseity.

That just repeats your claim

It does not prove your case or that you understand what God's aseity entails

 

[civic]

If God's foreknowledge is dependent on your future choices then that violates His aseity.

no thats your spin- God knows beforehand what will happen. God knows our choices in advance. That is foreknowledge.

 

[Presby02]

yes he cannot make his case lol.

Already did.

That just repeats your claim

It does not prove your case or that you understand what God's aseity entails

And my claim is valid. It is you that does not understand aseity.

 

[civic]

That just repeats your claim

It does not prove your case or that you understand what God's aseity entails

correct the one has nothing to do with the other- foreknowledge and Aseity go hand in hand together.

 

[Presby02]

no thats your spin- God knows beforehand what will happen. God knows our choices in advance. That is foreknowledge.

And that errant position means God's foreknowledge is dependent on your choices.

Aseity violation

 

[civic]

Already did.

And my claim is valid. It is you that does not understand aseity.

no its a strawman, a smokescreen an empty claim you have not proven.

 

[TomL]

Again, no one said threatened.

Your position is a clear violation of God's aseity.

Aseity has to do with God's self existence

he is in need of nothing to exist.

Nothing man can do, say or believe can threaten that existence

 

[civic]

And that errant position means God's foreknowledge is dependent on your choices.

Aseity violation

wrong Gods foreknowledge precedes mans choices.

no violation lol

next

 

[Presby02]

no its a strawman, a smokescreen an empty claim you have not proven.

Nope. It's quite valid, hence the game playing.


Aseity violation

 

[civic]

Aseity has to do with God's self existence

he is in need of nothing to exist.

Nothing man can do, say or believe can threaten that existence

correct some don't understand Gods attributes lol.

we did this song and dance on the old forum and they all fled like cockroaches when exposed to the light

 

[TomL]

And that errant position means God's foreknowledge is dependent on your choices.

Aseity violation

Again you provide no support for your claim

What is it foreknowledge of?

 

[Presby02]

wrong Gods foreknowledge precedes mans choices.

no violation lol

next

And what God foreknows is dependent on your future choices.

Aseity violation

 

[Handaan]

Don't quit your day job.

I wouldn't dream of it, I'm an ambassador for Christ day and night. 24/7. Talk with me About the gospel and I'll get you to drop Calvinism and you'll be on your way to heaven. Instead of begging for change in front of the 7-Eleven. I'm a poet and didn't even know it. I hope I don't blow it.

I crack myself up

Tell me another joke.

1. What did the Calvinist say when asked if he believed in free will? “I choose not to answer that question.”