yes like PSA and original sin.I've been called a Calvinist just for believing in substitutionary atonement and the sin nature.
Just a lot of bad and unclear teaching out there.
yes like PSA and original sin.![]()
I said without 2 verses in Isaiah 53 PSA has no argument.I wouldn't listen to someone who doesn't even mind taking Isaiah 53 out of their Bible.
And mocks someone's respect for it.
Sorry.
It is such lofty and high criticism that vexes me...I cannot attain too it.I used to call myself a calvinist. Then i ascended past it. They quote romans 9 all the time, and mention the elect alot.
Pffft...Calvinist.I've been called a Calvinist just for believing in substitutionary atonement and the sin nature.
Just a lot of bad and unclear teaching out there.
I can defend being a rutabaga from every book of the Bible.I said without 2 verses in Isaiah 53 PSA has no argument.
I can support my view of the atonement in every book of the Bible- you cannot.
BIG DIFFERENCE.
Pffft...Calvinist.![]()
I can defend being a rutabaga from every book of the Bible.
Even so I still love you and listen too your rantings.![]()
No...I was calling you a Calvinist.You don't think I'd pass for a Calvinist?!!
No...I was calling you a Calvinist.![]()
you are very well on your wayYou don't think I'd pass for a Calvinist?!!
yes I'm starting to wonderNo...I was calling you a Calvinist.![]()