e v e
Active Member
and once you dig even deeperWe do have translations older than the KJV .
then the continuation of corruptions
by esau (= corrupt egypt souls)
becomes more clear
the kjv being a sorcery text
and once you dig even deeperWe do have translations older than the KJV .
No. Adam is described in I think Isaiah. 14?,Honestly, I didn't understand much.
Question for you - is Adam Esau?
I know...Honestly, I didn't understand much.
Question for you - is Adam Esau?
I agree about nations, but the translation is correct. Further down the same chapter we have this:nations always refer to the demon nations,
therefore this passage appears corrupt and
perhaps retranslate it
I'd need to translate it..I agree about nations, but the translation is correct. Further down the same chapter we have this:
Isa 10:11 [The Assyrian says] "Shall I not do to Jerusalem and her idols as I have done to Samaria and her images?"
The idea here is that Israel and Judah are being included alongside the heathen "nations" because of their idolatry.
further , assyria is adam's region in mystery babylonI agree about nations, but the translation is correct. Further down the same chapter we have this:
Isa 10:11 [The Assyrian says] "Shall I not do to Jerusalem and her idols as I have done to Samaria and her images?"
The idea here is that Israel and Judah are being included alongside the heathen "nations" because of their idolatry.
I think he is...No. Adam is described in I think Isaiah. 14?,
as lucifer/satan. same being..
Esau are his sons..
in the other reality these are called sons of Ammon
when incarnated here they are esaus ...
= corrupt souls, 'adopted' sons of Adam
esau and adam have the sameI think he is...
ואלּה תּלדות עשׂו הוּא אדום Gen 36:1
??????????and once you dig even deeper
then the continuation of corruptions
by esau (= corrupt egypt souls)
becomes more clear
the kjv being a sorcery text
the septuagint corruption is clear in the screenshot....??????????
Are you saying the translations older than the KJV are even more corrupt?
Esau figures how in what you called corruptions?
yes, the corrupt septuagint.
see here, plus the attachment from 200 bc
right below what i posted.. the embed
places on an excerpt , to see the screen
shot from the text I am discussing,
click the title....
ptolemy ii's corrupt septuagint
was the bible used,
before and during and after Christ was on earth,
regardless of modern finds
... and in it are mixed together What God said
And what esau corrupted by adding, removing, rearranging, editing....
read the Aristeas letter, quoted below just one small detail...
to learn about the translation of what became the septuagint and their admitted intent to alter and improve the words !!!! Here from page 21 (archive org pdf), of the Aristeas letter, this proposal submitted after buttering up the hebrews by freeing some of them to obtain...
And so you assume this as true rather than scriptureptolemy ii's corrupt septuagint
was the bible used,
before and during and after Christ was on earth,
regardless of modern finds
... and in it are mixed together What God said
And what esau corrupted by adding, removing, rearranging, editing....
read the Aristeas letter, quoted below just one small detail...
to learn about the translation of what became the septuagint and their admitted intent to alter and improve the words !!!! Here from page 21 (archive org pdf), of the Aristeas letter, this proposal submitted after buttering up the hebrews by freeing some of them to obtain sympathy.... (notes in red plus bolding mine.)
"To the great king [a statement submitted] by Demetrius. In 29 obedience to thy order, O king, concerning the books that are wanting to complete the library (of Alexandria), that these should be added to the collection, and that those which have been lost should be duly replaced, after making careful inquiry into these matters, I refer the following statement to thee.
"Certain books of the Jewish law with some few others are wanting; 30 for these are composed in Hebrew letters and in the Hebrew tongue, but have been interpreted somewhat carelessly (!!!!) and not according to their true meaning (how would heathens know? what???) , according to information supplied by the experts (not anyone sent by God!) , because they have not hitherto received the supervision of royalty." (pagan ptolemy ii!!!)
And how is that Pagan 'royalty' ptolemy ii equipped to even begin to understand what God said? Certainly not God informed ptolemy ii of squat, nor his pompous experts. Rather, Demetrius proceeds as if it makes perfect sense that mystery babylon determine what God really said!
what i assume is that the aristeas letter was written,And so you assume this as true rather than scripture
Under Ptolemaic patronage
Founding
Bust excavated at the Villa of the Papyri depicting Ptolemy II Philadelphus, who is believed to have been the one to establish the Library as an actual institution,<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_Alexandria#cite_note-FOOTNOTEPhillips2010-3"><span>[</span>3<span>]</span></a> although plans for it may have been developed by his father Ptolemy I Soter<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_Alexandria#cite_note-FOOTNOTETracy2000343–344-2"><span>[</span>2<span>]</span></a>
The Library was one of the largest and most significant libraries of the ancient world, but details about it are a mixture of history and legend.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_Alexandria#cite_note-FOOTNOTEMacLeod20001–2-16"><span>[</span>16<span>]</span></a> The earliest known surviving source of information on the founding of the Library of Alexandria is the pseudepigraphic Letter of Aristeas, which was composed between c. 180 and c. 145 BC.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_Alexandria#cite_note-Lindberg1980-23"><span>[</span>23<span>]</span></a><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_Alexandria#cite_note-FOOTNOTETracy2000343-24"><span>[</span>24<span>]</span></a><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_Alexandria#cite_note-FOOTNOTEMacLeod20002-14"><span>[</span>14<span>]</span></a> It claims the Library was founded during the reign of Ptolemy I Soter (c. 323–c. 283 BC) and that it was initially organized by Demetrius of Phalerum, a student of Aristotle who had been exiled from Athens and taken refuge in Alexandria within the Ptolemaic court.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_Alexandria#cite_note-FOOTNOTETracy2000343-24"><span>[</span>24<span>]</span></a><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_Alexandria#cite_note-FOOTNOTEMacLeod20002-14"><span>[</span>14<span>]</span></a><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_Alexandria#cite_note-25"><span>[</span>25<span>]</span></a> Nonetheless, the Letter of Aristeas is very late and contains information that is now known to be inaccurate.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_Alexandria#cite_note-FOOTNOTETracy2000343-24"><span>[</span>24<span>]</span></a> According to Diogenes Laertius, Demetrius was a student of Theophrastus, a student of Aristotle.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_Alexandria#cite_note-26"><span>[</span>26<span>]</span></a> Other sources claim that the Library was instead created under the reign of Ptolemy I's son Ptolemy II Philadelphus (283–246 BC).<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_Alexandria#cite_note-FOOTNOTEPhillips2010-3"><span>[</span>3</a>
Why should I believe Aristeas letter when I have what claims to be from Godwhat i assume is that the aristeas letter was written,
it is an ancient text and a historical document
regarding a copied text known as septuagint
to be placed in the library of alexandria
I also assume esau does evil things
as we have witnessed all through history,
including murdering Christ
and almost half of his apostles
and almost half of his prophets
along with many souls of Him
murdered continuing up through
the inquisitions and now