What is the New Covenant?

Honestly, I didn't understand much.

Question for you - is Adam Esau?
No. Adam is described in I think Isaiah. 14?,
as lucifer/satan. same being..
Esau are his sons..
in the other reality these are called sons of Ammon
when incarnated here they are esaus ...
= corrupt souls, 'adopted' sons of Adam
 
Honestly, I didn't understand much.

Question for you - is Adam Esau?
I know...

esau runs theology depts, often functions as pastors..
and trains poor jacob as to Christianity ..
it's a mess.

The last two posts on septuagint and Ptolemy II
may clarify (a little bit) why my view doesn't match kjv.
 
nations always refer to the demon nations,
therefore this passage appears corrupt and
perhaps retranslate it
I agree about nations, but the translation is correct. Further down the same chapter we have this:

Isa 10:11 [The Assyrian says] "Shall I not do to Jerusalem and her idols as I have done to Samaria and her images?"

The idea here is that Israel and Judah are being included alongside the heathen "nations" because of their idolatry.
 
and given adam's betrayal of God...
eve's situation becomes less
what we were indoctrinated to see...
and needing to be clarified...
(it would be much to explain here
for me)
 
I agree about nations, but the translation is correct. Further down the same chapter we have this:

Isa 10:11 [The Assyrian says] "Shall I not do to Jerusalem and her idols as I have done to Samaria and her images?"

The idea here is that Israel and Judah are being included alongside the heathen "nations" because of their idolatry.
I'd need to translate it..
but the images would be the male and female Originals
= the two sticks, the two witnesses...
and what did adam do?
Gave us over to the Demon nations
who tortured us out of our eden bodies..

now...they did not conquer eden
just to do something

they conquered her to Steal..
and that is what they did,
which is the point of Daniels oven
(the torture above)
 
most of the OT refers to events in the other reality,
the events here being but mirrors to
what happened in Eden
and foreshadowing our
return to her
once meeting Christ on the Clouds
 
I agree about nations, but the translation is correct. Further down the same chapter we have this:

Isa 10:11 [The Assyrian says] "Shall I not do to Jerusalem and her idols as I have done to Samaria and her images?"

The idea here is that Israel and Judah are being included alongside the heathen "nations" because of their idolatry.
further , assyria is adam's region in mystery babylon
in the other reality... so right away
it seems to be corrupt, the line you quoted,
since jerusalem is always a Negative mystery
babylon location , term..
 
No. Adam is described in I think Isaiah. 14?,
as lucifer/satan. same being..
Esau are his sons..
in the other reality these are called sons of Ammon
when incarnated here they are esaus ...
= corrupt souls, 'adopted' sons of Adam
I think he is...

ואלּה תּלדות עשׂו הוּא אדום Gen 36:1
 
Gentile inclusion in Gods Covenant with Israel through Christ, was always intimated by some Prophets like Isaiah here Isa 42:1-7

Behold my servant {Christ], whom I uphold; mine elect, in whom my soul delighteth; I have put my spirit upon him: he shall bring forth judgment to the Gentiles.

2 He shall not cry, nor lift up, nor cause his voice to be heard in the street.

3 A bruised reed shall he not break, and the smoking flax shall he not quench: he shall bring forth judgment unto truth.

4 He shall not fail nor be discouraged, till he have set judgment in the earth: and the isles shall wait for his law.

5 Thus saith God the Lord, he that created the heavens, and stretched them out; he that spread forth the earth, and that which cometh out of it; he that giveth breath unto the people upon it, and spirit to them that walk therein:

6 ;I the Lord have called thee in righteousness, and will hold thine hand, and will keep thee, and give thee for a covenant of the people, for a light of the Gentiles;

7 To open the blind eyes, to bring out the prisoners from the prison, and them that sit in darkness out of the prison house.

Light here is spiritual enlighten which comes with regeneration and spiritual life. This is part of His Mediator New Covenant work

Its the Light of Life Jn 8 12

Then spake Jesus again unto them, saying, I am the light of the world: he that followeth me shall not walk in darkness, but shall have the light of life.

This indicates that the Gentiles are recipients of Covenant Gospel promises.

Also Isa 49:6


6 And he said, It is a light thing that thou shouldest be my servant to raise up the tribes of Jacob, and to restore the preserved of Israel: I will also give thee for a light to the Gentiles, that thou mayest be my salvation unto the end of the earth.

See this, the tribes of Judah and preserved of Israel is the election of grace among the jews, but He adds and also Bless the Gentiles, the elect of grace among the Gentiles, same Covenant Blessings.

The New Covenant brings Salvation to all the ends of the earth, every tribe, tongue and nation
 
and once you dig even deeper
then the continuation of corruptions
by esau (= corrupt egypt souls)
becomes more clear
the kjv being a sorcery text
??????????

Are you saying the translations older than the KJV are even more corrupt?

Esau figures how in what you called corruptions?
 
??????????

Are you saying the translations older than the KJV are even more corrupt?

Esau figures how in what you called corruptions?
the septuagint corruption is clear in the screenshot....
where demetrius states that of course ptolemy ii, referenced
there as (heathen) earthly royalty to decide what the right words
God said should be per ptolemy for his library of alexandria...of course,
changing God's words to fit his own views... and remarking
how his experts will change the words according to
what they think best
since per them the hebrew
expression (in their evil opinion) is too crude...
ptolemy ii was a follower of greek theology
= pythagorean, egyptian religion...
... (mystery-babylon)
esau being corrupt souls... as servants of
mystery babylon.. (and of ptolemy ii)
 
Last edited:
yes, the corrupt septuagint.

see here, plus the attachment from 200 bc
right below what i posted.. the embed
places on an excerpt , to see the screen
shot from the text I am discussing,
click the title....

ptolemy ii's corrupt septuagint
was the bible used,
before and during and after Christ was on earth,
regardless of modern finds
... and in it are mixed together What God said
And what esau corrupted by adding, removing, rearranging, editing....

read the Aristeas letter, quoted below just one small detail...
to learn about the translation of what became the septuagint and their admitted intent to alter and improve the words !!!! Here from page 21 (archive org pdf), of the Aristeas letter, this proposal submitted after buttering up the hebrews by freeing some of them to obtain sympathy.... (notes in red plus bolding mine.)

"To the great king [a statement submitted] by Demetrius. In 29 obedience to thy order, O king, concerning the books that are wanting to complete the library (of Alexandria), that these should be added to the collection, and that those which have been lost should be duly replaced, after making careful inquiry into these matters, I refer the following statement to thee.

"Certain books of the Jewish law with some few others are wanting; 30 for these are composed in Hebrew letters and in the Hebrew tongue, but have been interpreted somewhat carelessly (!!!!) and not according to their true meaning (how would heathens know? what???) , according to information supplied by the experts (not anyone sent by God!) , because they have not hitherto received the supervision of royalty." (pagan ptolemy ii!!!)

And how is that Pagan 'royalty' ptolemy ii equipped to even begin to understand what God said? Certainly not God informed ptolemy ii of squat, nor his pompous experts. Rather, Demetrius proceeds as if it makes perfect sense that mystery babylon determine what God really said!

And so you assume this as true rather than scripture

Under Ptolemaic patronage​

Founding​

Bust excavated at the Villa of the Papyri depicting Ptolemy II Philadelphus, who is believed to have been the one to establish the Library as an actual institution,<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_Alexandria#cite_note-FOOTNOTEPhillips2010-3"><span>[</span>3<span>]</span></a> although plans for it may have been developed by his father Ptolemy I Soter<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_Alexandria#cite_note-FOOTNOTETracy2000343–344-2"><span>[</span>2<span>]</span></a>
The Library was one of the largest and most significant libraries of the ancient world, but details about it are a mixture of history and legend.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_Alexandria#cite_note-FOOTNOTEMacLeod20001–2-16"><span>[</span>16<span>]</span></a> The earliest known surviving source of information on the founding of the Library of Alexandria is the pseudepigraphic Letter of Aristeas, which was composed between c. 180 and c. 145 BC.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_Alexandria#cite_note-Lindberg1980-23"><span>[</span>23<span>]</span></a><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_Alexandria#cite_note-FOOTNOTETracy2000343-24"><span>[</span>24<span>]</span></a><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_Alexandria#cite_note-FOOTNOTEMacLeod20002-14"><span>[</span>14<span>]</span></a> It claims the Library was founded during the reign of Ptolemy I Soter (c. 323–c. 283 BC) and that it was initially organized by Demetrius of Phalerum, a student of Aristotle who had been exiled from Athens and taken refuge in Alexandria within the Ptolemaic court.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_Alexandria#cite_note-FOOTNOTETracy2000343-24"><span>[</span>24<span>]</span></a><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_Alexandria#cite_note-FOOTNOTEMacLeod20002-14"><span>[</span>14<span>]</span></a><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_Alexandria#cite_note-25"><span>[</span>25<span>]</span></a> Nonetheless, the Letter of Aristeas is very late and contains information that is now known to be inaccurate.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_Alexandria#cite_note-FOOTNOTETracy2000343-24"><span>[</span>24<span>]</span></a> According to Diogenes Laertius, Demetrius was a student of Theophrastus, a student of Aristotle.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_Alexandria#cite_note-26"><span>[</span>26<span>]</span></a> Other sources claim that the Library was instead created under the reign of Ptolemy I's son Ptolemy II Philadelphus (283–246 BC).<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_Alexandria#cite_note-FOOTNOTEPhillips2010-3"><span>[</span>3</a>
 
And so you assume this as true rather than scripture

Under Ptolemaic patronage​

Founding​

Bust excavated at the Villa of the Papyri depicting Ptolemy II Philadelphus, who is believed to have been the one to establish the Library as an actual institution,<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_Alexandria#cite_note-FOOTNOTEPhillips2010-3"><span>[</span>3<span>]</span></a> although plans for it may have been developed by his father Ptolemy I Soter<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_Alexandria#cite_note-FOOTNOTETracy2000343–344-2"><span>[</span>2<span>]</span></a>
The Library was one of the largest and most significant libraries of the ancient world, but details about it are a mixture of history and legend.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_Alexandria#cite_note-FOOTNOTEMacLeod20001–2-16"><span>[</span>16<span>]</span></a> The earliest known surviving source of information on the founding of the Library of Alexandria is the pseudepigraphic Letter of Aristeas, which was composed between c. 180 and c. 145 BC.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_Alexandria#cite_note-Lindberg1980-23"><span>[</span>23<span>]</span></a><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_Alexandria#cite_note-FOOTNOTETracy2000343-24"><span>[</span>24<span>]</span></a><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_Alexandria#cite_note-FOOTNOTEMacLeod20002-14"><span>[</span>14<span>]</span></a> It claims the Library was founded during the reign of Ptolemy I Soter (c. 323–c. 283 BC) and that it was initially organized by Demetrius of Phalerum, a student of Aristotle who had been exiled from Athens and taken refuge in Alexandria within the Ptolemaic court.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_Alexandria#cite_note-FOOTNOTETracy2000343-24"><span>[</span>24<span>]</span></a><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_Alexandria#cite_note-FOOTNOTEMacLeod20002-14"><span>[</span>14<span>]</span></a><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_Alexandria#cite_note-25"><span>[</span>25<span>]</span></a> Nonetheless, the Letter of Aristeas is very late and contains information that is now known to be inaccurate.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_Alexandria#cite_note-FOOTNOTETracy2000343-24"><span>[</span>24<span>]</span></a> According to Diogenes Laertius, Demetrius was a student of Theophrastus, a student of Aristotle.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_Alexandria#cite_note-26"><span>[</span>26<span>]</span></a> Other sources claim that the Library was instead created under the reign of Ptolemy I's son Ptolemy II Philadelphus (283–246 BC).<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_Alexandria#cite_note-FOOTNOTEPhillips2010-3"><span>[</span>3</a>
what i assume is that the aristeas letter was written,
it is an ancient text and a historical document
regarding a copied text known as septuagint
to be placed in the library of alexandria

I also assume esau does evil things
as we have witnessed all through history,
including murdering Christ
and almost half of his apostles
and almost half of his prophets
along with many souls of Him
murdered continuing up through
the inquisitions and now
 
Last edited:
ptolemy's coronation , per aristeas letter,
was just as costly and paid in gold coin,
as all the wealth of
the richest man today...
he was certainly in a position
to murder, alter texts and
be as depraved as he possibly
could be , as would be
expected of an evil heathen..
today of course heathens
are normalized
and called secular...
and they continue to
do evil things.
 
lots of evil things have been done... true.
I don't have to assume that... we are in Babylon!
Not God's eden paradise, thanks to traitor adam...

God will restore His 144k soon..
the sun will go dark
and this earth and all its evil
will finally cease
 
what i assume is that the aristeas letter was written,
it is an ancient text and a historical document
regarding a copied text known as septuagint
to be placed in the library of alexandria

I also assume esau does evil things
as we have witnessed all through history,
including murdering Christ
and almost half of his apostles
and almost half of his prophets
along with many souls of Him
murdered continuing up through
the inquisitions and now
Why should I believe Aristeas letter when I have what claims to be from God

Is Aristeas more honest or powerful than God? More able to propagate the truth or be more concerned the truth may come out than He?

PS nowhere in scripture is Esau stated to be active throughout all history.
 
Back
Top Bottom