Sorry to contradict you but yes there was a time before these men had faith
That is your religion. Paul doesn't say anything here about men before Faith. He is pointing out that the Pharisees didn't care if a Gentile was circumcised in the heart or not. If a man was a Gentile "in the flesh", he was judged as without hope. Not by God as you preach to the world, but judged by those
who were called "the Circumcision".
If you would answer any of the questions I asked, we could have the discussion about this.
and before they had faith they were
Ephesians 2:11–12 (NASB 2020) — 11 Therefore remember that previously you, the Gentiles in the flesh, who are called “Uncircumcision” by the so-called “Circumcision” which is performed in the flesh by human hands—12 remember that you were at that time separate from Christ, excluded from the people of Israel, and strangers to the covenants of the promise, having no hope and without God in the world.
That isn't what Paul said, you are injecting your own words here. "Therefore remember that previously you, "
the Gentiles in the flesh" who are called “Uncircumcision”
by the so-called “Circumcision”".
You are injecting your own words, twisting Paul's message completely, "Therefore remember that previously you, "
men of no Faith",
who are called “Uncircumcision”
by the so-called “Circumcision”.
This doesn't make any sense. Men of "No Faith"
are the Uncircumcision, Jew or Gentile. This has always been the case.
You are preaching that now, by adding your own words, the "Wall of partition" you promote that
God created was between "Men of Faith" vs "Men of no Faith", and that Jesus came to tear down that wall. Of course this is absurd.
The truth is that the Partition was between "Gentiles "in the Flesh" and "Jews in the flesh" "made with hands".
Newsflash you just confirm what I stated
But Paul isn't talking about men of no Faith. The So called "circumcision" were men of no Faith. I simply am pointing out what Paul says. The "so-called" Circumcision, (Pharisees) had called Gentiles "in the flesh" uncircumcised. It didn't matter if they believed in God or not. Before Jesus exposed them and made a show of "Them", not God, openly, repentant faithful Gentiles "in the flesh", were not even allowed in the temple, were not even allowed atonement by the so-called "circumcision. Why would you ignore this undeniable biblical Fact.
This letter is not about men of no faith vs, men of no faith as you imply. The So-called "Circumcision" had no Faith. It's about the Pharisees creating Commandments contained in ordinances, which placed a partition that divided men by DNA. Gentile vs. Jew. As Paul is trying to teach you. But as the holy scriptures teach, God is no respecter of persons. It wasn't God who created the Partition, it was the So-called "circumcision.
I think you need to reread the context of my discussion as I was dealing with one who claimed that elect people were never without Christ
I have been dealing with the false interpretation of Eph. 2, that you have adopted and are now promoting, for years. The result of your religious philosophy here, is that Jesus came to correct the unjust laws of His Father. Although popular, this philosophy is an insidious falsehood. And I have spent countless hours trying to persuade people to honestly engage about what is actually happening here in Eph. 2.
I have no dog in your fight with others, I am addressing the error of your teaching regarding what the Partition is, and who's commandments contained in ordinances deceived people into living by it.
yet here we had gentiles who previously had no faith in Christ but now do.
But Paul isn't talking about faithless Gentiles. He is talking about Gentiles "in the flesh" who had turned to God "
And you hath he quickened, who were dead in trespasses and sins"
And the so-called "Circumcision, in the flesh made with hands", the only people on the planet where a man could go to hear about God, called Gentiles "in the flesh"
who had Faith, "the uncircumcision", with no hope and without God in the world.
Contrary to the Commandments of God.
Heb. 11:
31 By faith the harlot Rahab perished not with them that believed not, when she had received the spies with peace.
The children of the devil in Jesus time would have called Rahab "uncircumcised" and rejected her for the temple and would have rendered her as without God and without hope in the world.
Jesus exposed the mainstream religion of His Time, made a show of them openly on the cross, and broke down the wall of separation between race and DNA that the corrupt Jews has established.
"
Now therefore ye are no more strangers and foreigners, but fellowcitizens with the saints, and of the household of God;
Which is according to the commandments of God in the first place.
Lev. 19:
33 And if a stranger sojourn with thee in your land, ye shall not vex him. 34 But the stranger that dwelleth with you shall be unto you as one born among you, and thou shalt love him as thyself; for ye were strangers in the land of Egypt: I am the LORD your God.
The partition was created by the so-called "Circumcision" in the flesh made with hands. Not God's commandments.
In the view of the one who I was speaking to they would have been elect from the foundation of the world and never without Christ
I was addressing the popular but false religious philosophy you have adopted and are promoting regarding Eph. 2, that God, and
His Law contained in ordinances
divided men according to race and the DNA they were born with. And that Jesus had to come back and correct His Unjust Father, whose Commandments were against the Gentile who had turned to Him.
This is simply not true, although "many" who call Jesus Lord, Lord, preach it.