For those interested, I have shared that logos is used as in metonymy ( a figure of speech related to analogy). Basically that means that the characteristics of logos used in other contexts have now been used to identify One who exists with God and is God. Before sharing that One who came incarnate as Jesus, this unnamed One had been active in the creation of the world.That is a new one. That God cannot lie, and so He cannot say that Jesus is not God.
John 1:3 “Everything came to be through it.” The logos is an “it” not a “him.”
Translators have deliberately chosen to use “him” because they wanted to emphasize that the Word was the male person we know as Jesus. This was a theological choice, not a linguistic one.
"Do not forsake wisdom, and she will protect you; love her, and she will watch over you” (Proverbs 4:6).
Is the Wisdom in Proverbs 4:6 a distinct divine person?
The "Word" is not literally a person for the same reason that "Wisdom" is not literally a person. Both are to be taken metaphorically.
Jesus is the personification of the Word because He speaks the words of God. To listen to Jesus equals listening to the Word of God.
The metonymic use essentially takes the apologetic sense of logos developed by Philo in his incorporation of Proverbs 8 (with the participation of Wisdom in creation) and identified that creative role with One who participated along with God. John 1 then takes that unnamed One and shows that he took on flesh with whom we know as Jesus. This then is the pre-existent One who came in the flesh. This concept of logos also shows Jesus as the logos of Greek philosophy. Thus the text would appeal to anyone whether Jewish or Greek so they could know who Jesus is.
Therefore Jesus is a "he" not an "it," contrary to what the unitarians believe.
Some discussion of this also appears in #the-apostle-concept-of-logos
Praise God who used a Jewish apologist to connect a Greek philosophical concept of logos with the God of Israel. This happened in the proper moment of time to further identify the logos as the pre-existent One who came as Jesus. Jews would then have Philo's ideas shared among them as John's gospel was distributed.
The unitarian fails to understand the context and culture under which John 1 was written.
Last edited:
