They most certainly did know or should have known about all of the Word of God and of the Son of Man appearances - not to mention the multiple appearances of the Deity called the Angel of the Lord who claimed to be God, but could not be the Father because nobody can see the Father except Christ.
"Most certainly"??
Regardless of whether the common Jew thought that
- A. YHWH had made Himself visible to Gideon or Manoah, taking the shape of a body
- B. YHWH had used a Messenger to convey His Message
- C. YWHW had been seen "symbolically"
- D. There was no way to know what really happened
- E. It was no important to know what really happened.
the result is the same: They believed in One Personal God, that they called Adonai and wrote YHWH.
That's why the teachers of the Law and Jesus
agreed on the Oneness of God.
Please read the inspired text below.
Do you see any attempt by Jesus to correct the scribe regarding the Trinity... or to add something to what the Torah already taught? Do you see any disagreement between the teacher of the Law and Jesus?
One of the teachers of the law came and heard them debating. Noticing that Jesus had given them a good answer, he asked him, “Of all the commandments, which is the most important?”
“The most important one,” answered Jesus, “is this: ‘Hear, O Israel: YHVH our God, YHVH is one. Love YHVH your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind and with all your strength. 31 The second is this: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’ There is no commandment greater than these.”
“Well said, teacher,” the man replied. “You are right in saying that God is one and there is no other but him. To love him with all your heart, with all your understanding and with all your strength, and to love your neighbor as yourself is more important than all burnt offerings and sacrifices.”
When Jesus saw that he had answered wisely, he said to him, “You are not far from the kingdom of God.” And from then on no one dared ask him any more questions. (Mark 12:28-34)
Those multiple appearances meant that the Pharisees had no excuse for any ignorance on their part.
Did Jesus reproached them for not believing that the Angel of YHWH was actually Him, in a pre-incarnate state?
Jesus reproached the Pharisees for several things... and he did it
very emphatically.
Being hypocrites, seeking popularity, loading people with small irrelevant commandments, boasting about being children of Abraham but not practicing his righteousness, etc.... but being wrong about the identity of the Angel of YHWH???
Please reflect on that. Most importantly, don't pass moral judgement to me or to any member of this Forum.
Don't do it, please. I beg you.