praise_yeshua
Active Member
God having a queen or wife is fringe.
Is there a rank in between husband and wife?
God having a queen or wife is fringe.
There is the husband who has "authority " over the wife as in submits, just as we submit to Christ , believers submit to the elders and Christ submitted to the Father during His earthly ministry. So if you are using rank as in the above I would say yes. But all that to say there is mutual submission- submit to one another.Is there a rank in between husband and wife?
There is a mystery here that involves relationship. It is why God created mankind. God didn't make a mistake. This is the core of the message of the Gospel. A message that "original sin" can never rightfully establish.As loved
There is the husband who has "authority " over the wife as in submits, just as we submit to Christ , believers submit to the elders and Christ submitted to the Father during His earthly ministry. So if you are using rank as in the above I would say yes. But all that to say there is mutual submission- submit to one another.
For me I think of "roles" that differ better explain the relationships within the Tri-Unity of God than the word rank. I'm not saying there is no rank but that rank has more to do with roles and a mutual love that supersedes those roles so that its all done perfectly, good, loving- those one anothers that we are to do which reflect Gods nature,character, goodness, love, mercy, grace etc....... That sacrificial love that only comes from knowing God where its motivations are done in purity of heart, mind, soul.Is rank needed in the Holy Trinity? I know your answer.
I ask because of the relevance to relationship I know you see perfect Unity existing among the Holy Trinity. If the Holy Trinity is analogous to an intimate relationship between a husband and wife, then Eternal perfection will ultimately be established in such an intimate bond.
Brother, it takes our experience in this in this life to understand that for which we are purposed.
I'm not saying rank isn't there in Christ and His Church. However, perfect unity is devoid of rank. Devoid of division.
For me I think of "roles" that differ better explain the relationships within the Tri-Unity of God than the word rank. I'm not saying there is no rank but that rank has more to do with roles and a mutual love that supersedes those roles so that its all done perfectly, good, loving- those one anothers that we are to do which reflect Gods nature,character, goodness, love, mercy, grace etc....... That sacrificial love that only comes from knowing God where its motivations are done in purity of heart, mind, soul.
I’m tracking along with the above and agreeWords....Languages.
We often say the same things... differently. Not criticizing you at all. Just saying that the limits that exists with us doesn't exist with God. "Of One mind and One will" as generally stated in Holy Trinity is paradoxical (I know you realize this. Just reviewing.)
This can denote a lack of division. Not that "THEY" "GOD" are not of willing minds independently but in perfect agreement they are of the same mind. Which can translate to what we see as "ROLES".
We (human beings) live the Trinity "relationship" in our very lives. Husband, Wife, Son. It is cycle that repeats over and over again throughout generations. We "battle" for unity that only exists in the Holy Trinity. Perfection.
Paradoxical to say the least.
Add the "twins"..... aspect in natural birth as corresponding to the Incarnation. I'm a twin myself. Twins run in my family... and come to "Experiencing God". "Experiencing God" is written in the very fabric of our making.
I'm not unorthodox in these beliefs other than what I believe about Augustine's "original sin" and all the nonsense of "concupiscentia".
Well, we mostly agreeThere is a mystery here that involves relationship. It is why God created mankind. God didn't make a mistake. This is the core of the message of the Gospel. A message that "original sin" can never rightfully establish.
All I ask is that you consider it. We can discuss further if you like. Relationship among independent minds are very complicated. "Mysterious" is often nothing more than complexity that is difficult to understand.
The attempts to "dumb down" God's work into "original sin" is the confusion that Satan wants in our lives. After all....
Satan is a liar and THE DECEIVER. "Original sin" as preached is a false gospel of a fake peace. Don't get me wrong. I believe in sin. In fact, I probably see sin as having more of an impact in human lives that any of you do. The "guilt" associated with rebellion is deeper than the silliness man sees in the sin of Adam and Eve. It is the complicity in willingly embrace a lie. This is what damns mankind. This is very personal in every individual's life and has nothing to do with Adam and Eve's sin itself. In this false gospel most believe, Adam and Eve become a "scape goat" for sinfulness.
Repentance is a Holy Thing brother. It is where man realizes what he has made himself in the eyes of God. This is extraordinarily emotional and resonates in every area of our soul. It is the travail associated with "the new birth".
Hello brother,Neither Isaiah nor Paul suggests that Christ ontologically became sin itself (as if His nature changed); rather, He was reckoned, treated, or offered as the one bearing sin's penalty.
Amen brotherHello brother,
This statement right here agrees with the reading of 2 Cor 5:21 to be a sin offering for us and not sin for us.
The NLT states it quite well: "For God made Christ, who never sinned, to be the offering for our sin, so that we could be made right with God through Christ." (2Co 5:21)
God delivered His own Son as an offering for our sins, and our Lord willingly incurred the penalty for our sin, death. As a lamb had to be spotless without defect under the OT sacrificial system, so too must the Son of Man who gives His life to bear the sin of humanity be without sin. And as the lamb died for the sins of the sinners under the OT system, so too does the Lamb of God who took away the sins of the world by dying for our sins.
The sacrifice under the OT was holy unto the Lord, as without any doubt our Lord was holy unto His Father. The OT sacrifice never encountered God's wrath, as one needs to get his pound of flesh, but illustrates how God mercifully provided a representative for the people that dies for their sins; thus removing the sins from them and keeping them in covenant with Him.
In the OT system, the priests and people would lay their hands on the sacrifice confessing their sins that it was dying for. This gives us a glimpse of what God was doing with our Lord by laying upon Him the iniquity of us all. The OT sacrifice died explicitly for the sins of the people, so too does our Lord die for the sins of humanity that was laid upon Him by God.
When we think of iniquity laid upon Him, it means for what purpose He died. It was a judicial rendering from God that His own Son would die for humanity's sin. This does not make Him guilty, but He is holy unto God as One who bears the sins of the people.
"Therefore, as through one man's offense judgment came to all men, resulting in condemnation, even so through one Man's righteous act the free gift came to all men, resulting in justification of life. For as by one man's disobedience many were made sinners, so also by one Man's obedience many will be made righteous." (Rom 5:18-19)
God Bless
Hello brother,
This statement right here agrees with the reading of 2 Cor 5:21 to be a sin offering for us and not sin for us.
The NLT states it quite well: "For God made Christ, who never sinned, to be the offering for our sin, so that we could be made right with God through Christ." (2Co 5:21)
God delivered His own Son as an offering for our sins, and our Lord willingly incurred the penalty for our sin, death. As a lamb had to be spotless without defect under the OT sacrificial system, so too must the Son of Man who gives His life to bear the sin of humanity be without sin. And as the lamb died for the sins of the sinners under the OT system, so too does the Lamb of God who took away the sins of the world by dying for our sins.
The sacrifice under the OT was holy unto the Lord, as without any doubt our Lord was holy unto His Father. The OT sacrifice never encountered God's wrath, as one needs to get his pound of flesh, but illustrates how God mercifully provided a representative for the people that dies for their sins; thus removing the sins from them and keeping them in covenant with Him.
In the OT system, the priests and people would lay their hands on the sacrifice confessing their sins that it was dying for. This gives us a glimpse of what God was doing with our Lord by laying upon Him the iniquity of us all. The OT sacrifice died explicitly for the sins of the people, so too does our Lord die for the sins of humanity that was laid upon Him by God.
When we think of iniquity laid upon Him, it means for what purpose He died. It was a judicial rendering from God that His own Son would die for humanity's sin. This does not make Him guilty, but He is holy unto God as One who bears the sins of the people.
"Therefore, as through one man's offense judgment came to all men, resulting in condemnation, even so through one Man's righteous act the free gift came to all men, resulting in justification of life. For as by one man's disobedience many were made sinners, so also by one Man's obedience many will be made righteous." (Rom 5:18-19)
God Bless
our Lord willingly incurred the penalty for our sin
so too does our Lord die for the sins of humanity that was laid upon Him by God.
It was a judicial rendering from God that His own Son would die for humanity's sin.
This only needs one thought.
What does our sin truly deserve, what is its real penalty?
The judgement for sin is death. Once the body dies the soul goes into sheol, hades, hell, the grave.This only needs one thought.
What does our sin truly deserve, what is its real penalty?
What does our sin truly deserve? God said death
So do tell... Tell us all what you know about Satan.Is that all God said sin deserved?
Is Satan going to simply die for his sins and that's that?
Yes. Death is God's judgement for sin.Is that all God said sin deserved?
What happens with Satan is Irrelevant for many reasons. What is relevant is, "Then Death and Hades were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death. And anyone not found written in the Book of Life was cast into the lake of fire."Is Satan going to simply die for his sins and that's that?
It is good that you mention the second death.Yes. Death is God's judgement for sin.
What happens with Satan is Irrelevant for many reasons. What is relevant is, "Then Death and Hades were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death. And anyone not found written in the Book of Life was cast into the lake of fire."
All of mankind is resurrected from the dead and stand before Jesus Christ our Lord to face judgement.
"He will render to each one according to his works: to those who by patience in well-doing seek for glory and honor and immortality, he will give eternal life; but for those who are self-seeking and do not obey the truth, but obey unrighteousness, there will be wrath and fury."
"And just as it is appointed for man to die once, and after that comes judgment, so Christ, having been offered once to bear the sins of many, will appear a second time, not to deal with sin but to save those who are eagerly waiting for him."
Death is and always will be God's judgement for sin.
God Bless