praise_yeshua
Active Member
Ransom Theory. Many years ago when I first started reconsidering my theology based upon where I had been guided by peers and family, I dug into the various "Atonement Theories" that were recognized at the time. Since then, much of this has been "revisited" in certain circles.Our Lord Jesus Christ suffered death to ransom-purchase us for God. Death is our Father's judgment for sin, and our Father out of loving grace sent His own Son to die for our sins. In doing so, God shows that He is righteous for justifying everyone who believes in Jesus Christ, and only by believing in the death of Jesus Christ for our sins can one's consciousness of sin be cleansed so that he can approach God without guilt.
God loved us and sent His Son to save us from His wrath for sin. He did not show any retribution to His own Son. He showed loving grace towards us that while we were yet sinners Christ died for us. By God's grace, our sins were applied to His death, as our Lord said upon giving up His spirit, "It is finished".
What punishment does one deserve for sin? According to our God, it is death. What did the OT sacrifices do? Died for the sins of the people. What did our Lord do? Die for the sins of all everyone.
Did God kill His Son? No, according to our Lord, "Therefore the Father loves me, because I lay down my life, that I may take it again. No one takes it away from me, but I lay it down by myself. I have power to lay it down, and I have power to take it again. I received this commandment from my Father.”
And according to Peter in Acts 2, he preached to the Jews, "Him, being delivered by the determined purpose and foreknowledge of God, you have taken by lawless hands, have crucified, and put to death"...“Let all the house of Israel therefore know certainly that God has made him both Lord and Christ, this Jesus whom you crucified.”
Did God condemn His Son or just our sins in His sacrificial death? According to the Apostle Paul, "God did by sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh to be a sin offering. And so he condemned sin in the flesh".
God did not expend any wrath or retribution at His Son. This line of thinking is nowhere to be found in the bible.
God Bless
In the context of the "Ransom Theory", I couldn't reconcile the context of payment associated with the teaching. We must first, I believe, start with the idea of a "cost".
Removing the context of "money" (which I believe is very meaningful in how mankind/Satan judges value) what establishes the context of "cost"
This isn't intend to be a post relative to criticizing anyone. Just looking to really "unwrap" this for others.
The context of "sin" having "value" that would "cost" Christ... His bodily life, is foreign to my way of constructing my theology. At least that is where I'm at in all of this relative to the "ransom" theory.
Thanks