The misuse and abuse of John 17:3 by Unitarians to promote Unitarianism.

I do not fear for your soul.
I am 100% sure God loves you
I am 100% sure you love Him, so
I am 100% sure you are already with Him and will be with Him forever.



Dear readers:

I do believe in the literal crucifixion of Jesus.

But my point is not whether doctrine X is right or wrong.
My point is that demanding a person to adhere to doctrine X to receive the forgiveness of God is unsupported, biblically and logically... and can lead to moral wickedness, by sending billions of people from all religions to eternal physical and mental torture.
Correction, @Pancho Frijoles, no one is demanding anything from you. You may believe in a literal crucifixion, but you do not hold to a literal resurrection of Jesus, my friend. I sense that you may be here to try and persuade others to adopt your bloodless religion.

If you wish to appeal to the @Administrator, feel free to do so. However, you will remain in error by rejecting the core doctrines of the Christian faith.




Shalom.

J.
 
Your curiosity may be disappointed on that subject.
It's nothing but the same old story, you know... God is just merciful, merciful, merciful, merciful.... a thing some evangelicals find too boring to discuss or preach.
Just like medical cures and vaccines don't just materialize out of thin air, the same can be said about spiritual cures. So it is boring to live in an Islamic make-believe spiritual world where spiritual cures materialize out of thin air
I don't know about that account. Your memory may be better than mine.
I do remember, though, another account: a seraphim (which is a being similar to a flying snake) atoning the sins of Isaiah by touching his lips with a live coal.

Then one of the seraphim flew to me with a live coal in his hand, which he had taken with tongs from the altar. 7 With it he touched my mouth and said, “See, this has touched your lips; your guilt is taken away and your sin atoned for.” (Isaiah 6:6,7)

Do Jews believe that sins can be cured by flying snakes using live coals? ;)
I don't know about Jews but that account is rather reminiscent of what Christians call the Eucharist, which is based on the Life of Christ including the Cross.
 
This is fascinating. I ask you questions and show you undeniable truths about this world's religions who call Jesus Lord, Lord, and you continue as if I didn't ask you anything, and obsess instead, about a kind man that doesn't claim to be a Christian at all.

The Jesus of the Bible once said;

Matt. 7: 3 And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?

4 Or how wilt thou say to thy brother, Let me pull out the mote out of thine eye; and, behold, a beam is in thine own eye?

5 Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother's eye.

It seems it isn't enough to know the beam exists in your eye. Or confess the beam in your eye. Jesus said to remove it, cast it out. I believe this is because it is the Beam that causes men not to see clearly, not the knowledge that the beam exists.
The question was

but why do you imagine it is rare that anyone holds as important the works of Jesus?

Do you think you can assume it without proof?

BTW personal kindness does not save.
 
Are you telling us that a person must pray to Jesus in order to be considered a Christian?

I am telling you what scripture states

John 5:23 (KJV 1900) — 23 That all men should honour the Son, even as they honour the Father. He that honoureth not the Son honoureth not the Father which hath sent him.

and if you do not do it you do not honoe the Father

That's not what Paul taught.
Paul could have seized the opportunity to indicate that men can have an intercessor before God through a God-man, called Jesus.
Paul didn't do that. Not just he didn't do that... he chose to use the term "Man".
This also is Paul

Titus 2:13 (LEB) — 13 looking forward to the blessed hope and the glorious appearing of our great God and Savior Jesus Christ,

Romans 9:5 (LEB) — 5 to whom belong the patriarchs, and from whom is the Christ according to human descent, who is God over all, blessed forever! Amen.





Moses was an effective intercessor before God. Moses didn't need to be a God-man to do that.

God cannot be a man. A man cannot be God.
They are mutually exclusive categories.
There have never been god-men, except in pagan mythologies.
Moses cannot save you but Jesus can

Acts 4:12 (LEB) — 12 And there is salvation in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven that is given among people by which we must be saved.”

Not even Baha'i fairytales
 
Dear readers:

I do believe in the literal crucifixion of Jesus.

But my point is not whether doctrine X is right or wrong.
My point is that demanding a person to adhere to doctrine X to receive the forgiveness of God is unsupported, biblically and logically... and can lead to moral wickedness, by sending billions of people from all religions to eternal physical and mental torture.
Of course, the common person doesn't need to know all the facts of God's redemptive history to be saved but that does not mean that we can possess a naive make-believe view of spiritual reality as Muslims do.

We've already discussed how medical cures are analogous to spiritual cures. Without Health Researchers and Professionals responsibly doing their job then there is no vaccination to be had, let alone any discussion to be had with Patients.

It's incumbent and the responsibility of those in charge of administering the vaccination to know about the vaccine's development, effects, and the patient's historical records before administering the vaccine. Responsible Health Professionals do not do it naively nor blindly. Those same principles can be applied to the spiritual realm.

What is naive and void of spiritual reality is the Islamic idea that the Redemptive History of God is void of the transformative restoration of the relationship between humanity and God, achieved through Christ's Incarnation, Sacrifice, Resurrection, and Ascension, that is the basis of our forgiveness.
 
I do not fear for your soul.
I am 100% sure God loves you
I am 100% sure you love Him, so
I am 100% sure you are already with Him and will be with Him forever.



Dear readers:

I do believe in the literal crucifixion of Jesus.

But my point is not whether doctrine X is right or wrong.
My point is that demanding a person to adhere to doctrine X to receive the forgiveness of God is unsupported, biblically and logically... and can lead to moral wickedness, by sending billions of people from all religions to eternal physical and mental torture.
Actually it is your statement which is not supported biblically

John 8:24Thus I said to you that you will die in your sins. For if you do not believe that I am he, you will die in your sins.”
John 6:53 (LEB) — 53 Then Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you do not have life in yourselves!

John 17:3 (LEB) — 3 Now this is eternal life: that they know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom you have sent.

John 14:6 (LEB) — 6 Jesus said to him, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.
 
Just like medical cures and vaccines don't just materialize out of thin air, the same can be said about spiritual cures. So it is boring to live in an Islamic make-believe spiritual world where spiritual cures materialize out of thin air
God forgiveness materializes out of thin wind.
A wind that comes from nowhere and everywhere, and goes nowhere and everywhere.

I don't know about Jews but that account is rather reminiscent of what Christians call the Eucharist, which is based on the Life of Christ including the Cross.
How is that?
In the account of the seraphim there is no blood, no payment or ransom, and no need to believe in any particular doctrine… just Isaiah’s acknowledgement of his own incapacity.
The episode is reminiscent of what you believed in your childhood: God forgives because he is merciful with those who show humbleness.
 
Actually it is your statement which is not supported biblically

John 8:24Thus I said to you that you will die in your sins. For if you do not believe that I am he, you will die in your sins.”
John 6:53 (LEB) — 53 Then Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you do not have life in yourselves!

John 17:3 (LEB) — 3 Now this is eternal life: that they know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom you have sent.

John 14:6 (LEB) — 6 Jesus said to him, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.
None of those verses refer to the need to adhere to doctrines.
Those verses refer to living the life of Christ. If any pastor has taught you otherwise, he is wrong.
If you were really convinced that the Bible requests adhering to an orthodox theology in order to escape eternal torment, you would have already thrown your Bible away.
We can debate on soteriology if you wish.
 
Jesus poured out the Holy Spirit only after the Cross and his Ascension. So that "wind" you mentioned is of a different spirit than the Holy Spirit.
If you read your Bible carefully you would have solid arguments in a debate.
By the same token, If you knew and value your own religion, you would be able to understand and value other religions.

The spirit of God has been active since the creation and the need to be born from the spirit was mentioned by Jesus to Nicodemus before his crucifixion, and Jesus made no connection between being born from the spirit and a blood atonement as a requisite.

People have always needed the mercy of God, and God has extended that mercy without the need of any ransom, blood, or intellectual assent to the deity or resurrection of Christ.

That is a biblical fact.
Placing conditions to God’s mercy that Jesus Himself never placed is wrong and it is evil.
 
If you read your Bible carefully you would have solid arguments in a debate.
I do have solid arguments in a debate. It's Jesus' pouring out of the Holy Spirit only after the Cross and his Ascension.
By the same token, If you knew and value your own religion, you would be able to understand and value other religions.
What type of person do you think values the cut-throat Quran verses? A sweet kind hearted person?
The spirit of God has been active since the creation and the need to be born from the spirit was mentioned by Jesus to Nicodemus before his crucifixion, and Jesus made no connection between being born from the spirit and a blood atonement as a requisite.
Water was mentioned (John 3:5), baptismal water to be more extact, and what do you think baptism signifies? The Cross, Burial, and Resurrection of our Lord. There's your connection to the Cross.
People have always needed the mercy of God, and God has extended that mercy without the need of any ransom, blood, or intellectual assent to the deity or resurrection of Christ.

That is a biblical fact.
Placing requirements for God’s mercy Jesus Himself never placed is wrong and it is evil.
Again, the common person doesn't need to know all the facts of God's redemptive history to be saved but that does not mean that we can possess a naive make-believe view of spiritual reality as Muslims do.

We've already discussed how medical cures are analogous to spiritual cures. Without Health Researchers and Professionals responsibly doing their job then there is no vaccination to be had, let alone any discussion to be had with Patients.

It's incumbent and the responsibility of those in charge of administering the vaccination to know about the vaccine's development, effects, and the patient's historical records before administering the vaccine. Responsible Health Professionals do not do it naively nor blindly. Those same principles can be applied to the spiritual realm.

What is naive and void of spiritual reality is the Islamic idea that the Redemptive History of God is void of the transformative restoration of the relationship between humanity and God, achieved through Christ's Incarnation, Sacrifice, Resurrection, and Ascension, that is the basis of our forgiveness.
 
Water was mentioned (John 3:5), baptismal water to be more extact, and what do you think baptism signifies? The Cross, Burial, and Resurrection of our Lord. There's your connection to the Cross.
The baptism is a symbol of our spiritual death and resurrection. A spiritual resurrection into a new life, that starts on this earth.
There is no inherent salvific power in a ritual.

Therefore we were buried with Him by baptism into death, that just as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life. (Roman 6:4)

So, Jesus is not saying we need to believe in a physical resurrection to be forgiven by God.
Jesus is using the symbol of baptism to talk about newness of life. It is this newness of life (not a belief in physical resurrection or a blood atonement) which constitutes salvation.





Again, the common person doesn't need to know all the facts of God's redemptive history to be saved but that does not mean that we can possess a naive make-believe view of spiritual reality as Muslims do.
We MUST possess a naive view of the spiritual reality of forgiveness.
It is not only the view of Muslims and Baha’is. It is the same view that Jews had. The same view that Jesus had. The same view that you had as a child.
Be naive as a child. Remmeber what you learned about forgiveness.




We've already discussed how medical cures are analogous to spiritual cures. Without Health Researchers and Professionals responsibly doing their job then there is no vaccination to be had, let alone any discussion to be had with Patients.

It's incumbent and the responsibility of those in charge of administering the vaccination to know about the vaccine's development, effects, and the patient's historical records before administering the vaccine. Responsible Health Professionals do not do it naively nor blindly. Those same principles can be applied to the spiritual realm.
In the beaitiful analogy you propose, God is the physician, we are the patients, and the medicine is his grace.
The doctor does not require from patients to know the nuances of scientific development of the medicine.
He only requires patients to accept they need the medicine.

God never ever required any person to complete a quiz on Theology to be the subject of his grace.
Jews, Christians, Muslims and Bahais are forgiven upon the very same requirement: repentance
.


What is naive and void of spiritual reality is the Islamic idea that the Redemptive History of God is void of the transformative restoration of the relationship between humanity and God, achieved through Christ's Incarnation, Sacrifice, Resurrection, and Ascension, that is the basis of our forgiveness.
What is devoid of spiritual reality is the belief that people are saved by their confessions and creeds.
That is superstition and ignorance, that false pastors use to retain control over the minds and pocket$ of their flocks.
Any demon can confess whatever we want to hear from them. Furthermore, any AI software can be programmed to do it.
Living a transformed life, however, is only possible by the action of the Spirit of God.
 
The baptism is a symbol of our spiritual death and resurrection. A spiritual resurrection into a new life, that starts on this earth.
There is no inherent salvific power in a ritual.

Therefore we were buried with Him by baptism into death, that just as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life. (Roman 6:4)

So, Jesus is not saying we need to believe in a physical resurrection to be forgiven by God.
Jesus is using the symbol of baptism to talk about newness of life. It is this newness of life (not a belief in physical resurrection or a blood atonement) which constitutes salvation.
Looks like your presuppositions revolted against John 3:5.

(John 3:5) Jesus answered, “Most assuredly, I say to you, unless one is born of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God.

John 3:5 states a non-negotiable fact, not something you can dismiss as a nebulous symbol. One's entrance into the Kingdom of God is at stake here. I highly recommend you reread the verse.
We MUST possess a naive view of the spiritual reality of forgiveness.
It is not only the view of Muslims and Baha’is. It is the same view that Jews had. The same view that Jesus had. The same view that you had as a child.
Be naive as a child. Remmeber what you learned about forgiveness.
It is not the view that Jesus had. Jesus did not go to the Cross naively. He was sweating profusely thinking about it, as we all would.
In the beaitiful analogy you propose, God is the physician, we are the patients, and the medicine is his grace.
The doctor does not require from patients to know the nuances of scientific development of the medicine.
He only requires patients to accept they need the medicine.

God never ever required any person to complete a quiz on Theology to be the subject of his grace.
Jews, Christians, Muslims and Bahais are forgiven upon the very same requirement: repentance
.
I wouldn't say that it was God who administered my baptism or the Lord's Supper. There was an actual Pastor who administered my baptism and administers the Lord's Supper Just like it's the Health Professionals duty to know about the vaccine's development, effects, and the patient's historical records before administering the vaccine, the Pastor is also responsible but in a spiritual sense.

Responsible Health Professionals do not do it naively nor blindly and neither should Pastors.
What is devoid of spiritual reality is the belief that people are saved by their confessions and creeds.
That is superstition and ignorance, that false pastors use to retain control over the minds and pocket$ of their flocks.
Any demon can confess whatever we want to hear from them. Furthermore, any AI software can be programmed to do it.
Beliefs (creeds) are vital if it's salvation that you seek:

(Matt Chapter 10)
8 But what does it say? “The word is near you, in your mouth and in your heart” (that is, the word of faith which we preach):
9 that if you confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus and believe in your heart that God has raised Him from the dead, you will be saved.
10 For with the heart one believes unto righteousness, and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.
11 For the Scripture says, “Whoever believes on Him will not be put to shame.”
12 For there is no distinction between Jew and Greek, for the same Lord over all is rich to all who call upon Him.
13 For “whoever calls on the name of the Lord shall be saved.”
Living a transformed life, however, is only possible by the action of the Spirit of God.
Unless one is born of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God (John 3:5). Which Kingdom will you be entering?
 
None of those verses refer to the need to adhere to doctrines.
Those verses refer to living the life of Christ. If any pastor has taught you otherwise, he is wrong.
If you were really convinced that the Bible requests adhering to an orthodox theology in order to escape eternal torment, you would have already thrown your Bible away.
We can debate on soteriology if you wish.
They do if you read them

Actually it is your statement which is not supported biblically

John 8:24Thus I said to you that you will die in your sins. For if you do not believe that I am he, you will die in your sins.”
John 6:53 (LEB) — 53 Then Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you do not have life in yourselves!

John 17:3 (LEB) — 3 Now this is eternal life: that they know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom you have sent.

John 14:6 (LEB) — 6 Jesus said to him, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.

Believe? know? They refer to knowing and believing - doctrine

You can't be saved if you do not know and believe
 
They do if you read them

Actually it is your statement which is not supported biblically

John 8:24Thus I said to you that you will die in your sins. For if you do not believe that I am he, you will die in your sins.”
John 6:53 (LEB) — 53 Then Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you do not have life in yourselves!

John 17:3 (LEB) — 3 Now this is eternal life: that they know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom you have sent.

John 14:6 (LEB) — 6 Jesus said to him, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.

Believe? know? They refer to knowing and believing - doctrine

You can't be saved if you do not know and believe
Rom 10:17 So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God.

Eph 1:13 In whom ye also trusted, after that ye heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation: in whom also after that ye believed, ye were sealed with that holy Spirit of promise,
Eph 1:14 Which is the earnest of our inheritance until the redemption of the purchased possession, unto the praise of his glory.

Inform him how often "doctrine" is referenced in Scripture and clarify what it means. He appears to have an unhealthy aversion to anything labeled as "doctrine" while not hesitating to promote the doctrines of the Bahá'í "faith."

J.
 
Last edited:
Looks like your presuppositions revolted against John 3:5.

(John 3:5) Jesus answered, “Most assuredly, I say to you, unless one is born of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God.

John 3:5 states a non-negotiable fact, not something you can dismiss as a nebulous symbol. One's entrance into the Kingdom of God is at stake here. I highly recommend you reread the verse.

It is not the view that Jesus had. Jesus did not go to the Cross naively. He was sweating profusely thinking about it, as we all would.

I wouldn't say that it was God who administered my baptism or the Lord's Supper. There was an actual Pastor who administered my baptism and administers the Lord's Supper Just like it's the Health Professionals duty to know about the vaccine's development, effects, and the patient's historical records before administering the vaccine, the Pastor is also responsible but in a spiritual sense.

You were not saved by the baptism or Lord’s Supper.
Ancient Israelites were not saved by circumcision or animal sacrifices.
Pastors or priests do not heal people spiritually by performing rituals on them or for them. That’s primitive paganism.

Responsible Health Professionals do not do it naively nor blindly and neither should Pastors.

Beliefs (creeds) are vital if it's salvation that you seek:
Only inasmuch as those beliefs lead you to seek repentance and be born again into a life of love.
If a belief leads you to think that a Jehovah Witness is not your brother and deserves eternal torment, then such belief is satanic and you must reject it.
  • Scriptures don’t save.
  • Rituals don’t save.
  • Sacrifices don’t save.
  • Creeds don’t save.
  • God’s grace saves.

(Matt Chapter 10)
8 But what does it say? “The word is near you, in your mouth and in your heart” (that is, the word of faith which we preach):
9 that if you confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus and believe in your heart that God has raised Him from the dead, you will be saved.
10 For with the heart one believes unto righteousness, and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.
11 For the Scripture says, “Whoever believes on Him will not be put to shame.”
12 For there is no distinction between Jew and Greek, for the same Lord over all is rich to all who call upon Him.
13 For “whoever calls on the name of the Lord shall be saved.”
The verses you are quoting are not from the gospel of Matthew and do not represent Jesus direct teachings.
You are quoting Paul, who is speaking to the church in Rome within the context of the Greek-Judaizer controversy. A totally different context to discuss.


Unless one is born of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God (John 3:5). Which Kingdom will you be entering?
Jesus was not teaching salvation by rituals.
He was using metaphors like “being born again”, “water”, “wind/spirit”, “kingdom” as tools to convey spiritual truths: repentance and newness of life.
 
They do if you read them

Actually it is your statement which is not supported biblically

John 8:24Thus I said to you that you will die in your sins. For if you do not believe that I am he, you will die in your sins.”
John 6:53 (LEB) — 53 Then Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you do not have life in yourselves!

John 17:3 (LEB) — 3 Now this is eternal life: that they know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom you have sent.

John 14:6 (LEB) — 6 Jesus said to him, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.

Believe? know? They refer to knowing and believing - doctrine

You can't be saved if you do not know and believe
They are not refering to doctrine, my brother.
They are refering to practice.
To know God and to know Jesus does not mean studying Theology, but to live the life of love. This is why “Whoever does not love does not know God, because God is love” 1 John 4:8

Believing Jesus means doing what Jesus told us to do. he explained it this way:

Why do you call me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ and do not do what I say? 47 As for everyone who comes to me and hears my words and puts them into practice, I will show you what they are like. 48 They are like a man building a house, who dug down deep and laid the foundation on rock. When a flood came, the torrent struck that house but could not shake it, because it was well built. 49 But the one who hears my words and does not put them into practice is like a man who built a house on the ground without a foundation. The moment the torrent struck that house, it collapsed and its destruction was complete.” Luke 6:46-49
 
Jesus was not teaching salvation by rituals.
He was using metaphors like “being born again”, “water”, “wind/spirit”, “kingdom” as tools to convey spiritual truths: repentance and newness of life.
This is error-
The Context of John 3:3-8: A Literal Transformation, Not Mere Symbolism

John 3:3
"Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born again (γεννηθῇ ἄνωθεν, gennēthē anōthen), he cannot see the kingdom of God."

The Greek word ἄνωθεν (anōthen) means both "again" and "from above," implying a spiritual rebirth initiated by God. This dual meaning suggests a deeper theological reality, not just a metaphor for moral or behavioral change.

Jesus uses γεννηθῇ (gennēthē), a verb for literal birth or begetting. The aorist passive subjunctive form emphasizes an action performed upon the individual by an external agent-God. This rebirth is a transformative event, not a figurative concept of repentance alone.

2. The Role of Water and Spirit in Salvation

John 3:5
"Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born of water and the Spirit (ἐξ ὕδατος καὶ Πνεύματος, ex hydatos kai Pneumatos), he cannot enter the kingdom of God."

The conjunction καί (kai) ("and") joins ὕδατος ("water") and Πνεύματος ("Spirit") in a single concept, suggesting that both are integral to the new birth. This rules out purely metaphorical interpretations.

The mention of water likely alludes to baptism, a consistent theme in the New Testament (cf. Acts 2:38, Titus 3:5). The grammatical structure and context do not support reducing "water" to mere metaphorical language, especially in light of John 1:33, where the Spirit and water are linked in Jesus' baptism.

3. The Spirit as the Agent of Regeneration

John 3:6-8
"That which is born of the flesh is flesh, and that which is born of the Spirit (ἐκ τοῦ Πνεύματος, ek tou Pneumatos) is spirit. Do not marvel that I said to you, 'You must be born again.' The wind (πνεῦμα, pneuma) blows where it wishes, and you hear its sound, but you do not know where it comes from or where it goes. So it is with everyone who is born of the Spirit."

The word πνεῦμα (pneuma) means both "spirit" and "wind." Jesus deliberately uses this double meaning to highlight the invisible yet powerful work of the Holy Spirit. The analogy to wind does not reduce the Spirit's work to metaphor but emphasizes its mysterious and sovereign nature.

The preposition ἐκ (ek) ("of") denotes origin or source, showing that the new birth is entirely a work of the Holy Spirit, not a metaphorical self-effort.

4. Jesus’ Use of Literal and Spiritual Realities


While Jesus often employs metaphorical language, His discussion with Nicodemus in John 3 is rooted in literal spiritual truths.

This is evident from Nicodemus’ confusion in John 3:4, where he interprets Jesus' statement about being "born again" in purely physical terms. Jesus’ clarification in verses 5-8 shifts the focus to the spiritual but does not negate the literal transformation required by God’s Spirit.

Greek Linguistic Precision:
Words like γεννάω (to beget), ὕδωρ (water), and πνεῦμα (spirit/wind) carry theological weight in this context. Jesus uses them consistently throughout the discourse to refer to the divine work of regeneration, not mere allegories for moral improvement.

5. The Broader Biblical Context

Titus 3:5:
"He saved us, not because of works done by us in righteousness, but according to his own mercy, by the washing of regeneration (λουτροῦ παλιγγενεσίας, loutrou palingenesias) and renewal of the Holy Spirit."

The phrase λουτροῦ παλιγγενεσίας ("washing of regeneration") closely parallels "born of water and the Spirit" in John 3:5, reinforcing the connection between water, Spirit, and salvation.

Ezekiel 36:25-27:
Jesus’ language echoes this Old Testament prophecy:
"I will sprinkle clean water on you, and you shall be clean... I will give you a new heart, and a new spirit I will put within you... and cause you to walk in my statutes."

Ezekiel's reference to water and Spirit reflects God's promise of internal transformation, fulfilled in the new birth Jesus describes.

The Greek text of John 3:3-8, combined with its context and the broader biblical witness, affirms that Jesus was not merely teaching repentance or a figurative "newness of life" but describing a literal, divine transformation through the work of the Holy Spirit.

The precise grammar and theological consistency of terms like γεννάω, ὕδωρ, and πνεῦμα point to regeneration as an essential and objective work of God in salvation. To reduce this to metaphorical teaching undermines the depth and coherence of the Gospel message.

To be consistent with your Bahá'í faith, you must reinterpret and allegorize the plain, literal text of D'varim as it stands written in its grammatical and historical context-particularly in its perfect tense.

This approach would require you to deny or spiritualize straightforward statements that were clearly intended to be understood literally by their original audience. Such reinterpretation undermines the text's original meaning and replaces it with external theological presuppositions alien to the Scripture's intended message.

Thanks

J.
 
It is not the view that Jesus had. Jesus did not go to the Cross naively. He was sweating profusely thinking about it, as we all would.
Of course it is the view Jesus had about forgiveness and salvation. He explained it several times in unequivocal terms and examples.
Haven’t you reflected on the parable of the tax collector and the Pharisee? The parable of the prodigal son? The parable of the king who forgwve his subject’s debt? Havent you reflected on the words of the Lord’s prayer and the Sermon of the Mountain?
On the story of the woman who washed and anointed his feet? On the crippled man whose sins sere forgiven? On the prayer of intercession of Jesus for the Roman soldiers?

Jesus was bleeding and sweating in his way to Calvary for having sustained the pure, naive view of forgiveness that you had as a child.
 
Believing Jesus means doing what Jesus told us to do. he explained it this way:
You openly confess that you are not a Christian and consistently redefine and reinterpret the Scriptures, rejecting the literal resurrection of the Messiah. This compels me to ask, "Which Jesus are you referring to?"

J.
 
Back
Top Bottom