So you're saying Jesus was created? Well, half created I guess. I wonder what Paul would say to that?Jesus had no human soul prior to being conceived in Mary’s womb, that’s where His human soul was created.
Next
So you're saying Jesus was created? Well, half created I guess. I wonder what Paul would say to that?Jesus had no human soul prior to being conceived in Mary’s womb, that’s where His human soul was created.
Next
The Son is eternally begotten from the Father. That's why the Father is called the Father and the Son is called the Son. That’s the main ontological difference between the Father and the Son.So you are saying the Trinity didn't exist until the Incarnation? Afterall, if the Lord Jesus was not two natures prior, then He was no different to the Father.
His Diety is not mutable. He took on human nature (body and soul) but that did not negate, change, nor confuse his Divine Personhood or Nature. Both natures kept their integrity even though there was no separation between the two natures.He would have been Deity only and that is the Father. Also He would have had to change His personhood as His person isn't Deity alone but Deity and humanity in one person. That would mean He is mutable.
Jesus is the Uncreated Word of God who took on human nature (human soul and body). That taking on of human nature did not and could not negate Jesus' Personhood and Divinity as continuing to be the Uncreated Word of God.So you're saying Jesus was created? Well, half created I guess. I wonder what Paul would say to that?
I'm not looking for distinction, I'm showing you the word says there is distinction.You're looking for distinction when there is possibly not one to be seen.
Our human nature is in our soul, not our body. If it was in our body as well, then we would stop existing when our bodies rot away.He took on human nature (body and soul)
And that would mean His person changed. He is the One person yesterday, today and tomorrow. You can't add something to Him and then say He is immutable.His Diety is not mutable. He took on human nature (body and soul) but that did not negate, change, nor confuse his Divine Personhood or Nature. Both natures kept their integrity even though there was no separation between the two natures.
Yes you have Him human when He was only Divine pre Incarnation. It’s your Christology that is off base not ours. His Divine nature never changed pre/post Incarnation.And that would mean His person changed. He is the One person yesterday, today and tomorrow. You can't add something to Him and then say He is immutable.
It has nothing to do with confusing the two natures, it has everything to do with changing who and what the person of Christ is.
That refers to animals. Our life is in our soul. It is what is made in the image and likeness of God. Adam did not become a living soul until after that life God created in Gen.1:17 was breathed into him. The body God formed in Gen.2 had blood but no human life.The life of the FLESH... is in the blood of man. I was very clear about what I said. Very clear. You're the one "mudding the water". Not me.
You don't believe that our bodies are part of our human nature? If they're not part of our human nature then what type of nature are they part of?Our human nature is in our soul, not our body.
False. We still carry on as souls after death.If it was in our body as well, then we would stop existing when our bodies rot away.
He didn’t say body only. Where did he say that he has a soul already?And Jesus said a body you prepared for me. He did not say a soul and body you prepared for me.
Hebrews 10:5
Therefore, when He came into the world, He said: “Sacrifice and offering You did not desire, But a body You have prepared for Me.
Full of faith? No, but I'm working on it.By your own measure, you sin. Thusly you're not faithful.
False. We keep telling you that Jesus' Personhood was, is, and always will be the Uncreated Word of God. You're not listening to what we keep telling you.And that would mean His person changed. He is the One person yesterday, today and tomorrow. You can't add something to Him and then say He is immutable.
See above.It has nothing to do with confusing the two natures, it has everything to do with changing who and what the person of Christ is.
Where does the Bible say Adam repented I would love to read about what the Bible actually says , got Scripture?Full of faith? No, but I'm working on it.
Was Adam full of faith? No, but he had enough to repent.
Was Christ full of faith? 100% at all times.
Can you see the difference now?
I've had enough. I have never said the Incarnation robbed Jesus of His Divinity. You don't listen to what I say with any understanding.Jesus was unique but you're insisting that the Incarnation robbed Jesus of Divinity. Scriptures such as this prove you wrong.
You just don't see it do you. It is not His nature that is changing, by adding the second nature at a later date, you are changing HIS PERSON.Yes you have Him human when He was only Divine pre Incarnation. It’s your Christology that is off base not ours. His Divine nature never changed pre/post Incarnation.
hope this helps !!!
False. We keep telling you that Jesus' Personhood was, is, and always will be the Uncreated Word of God. You're not listening to what we keep telling you.You just don't see it do you. It is not His nature that is changing, by adding the second nature at a later date, you are changing HIS PERSON.
Yes because what makes us human is in our soul. Our bodies enable us to express our humanity. We are created in the image of God. God did not have a body until the Incarnation. The likeness is to be found in the Person of God the Son who was, is and is always both Divine and human in His Person.False. We still carry on as souls after death
I know He is the uncreated word of God, what you keep missing is that Person is unchanging which must necessarily mean He has always been Divine and human otherwise you have the Person of God the Son changing at a point in time.False. We keep telling you that Jesus' Personhood was, is, and always will be the Uncreated Word of God. You're not listening to what we keep telling you.
God made a sacrifice for Adam in order to get animal skins. That sacrifice was applied to Adam. Now, unless you are reverting to your Calvinistic ways, you know the sacrifice is only applied to those who repent and believe.Where does the Bible say Adam repented I would love to read about what the Bible actually says , got Scripture?