The Calvinists eisegesis of John 6:55

[Presby02]

It’s not advantageous; basically, it’s pretty worthless and, imo, a waste of time.

s e l a h

Yet here you are. LOL

 

[Selah]

Yet here you are. LOL

… but not engaging in a thing of nought. : )

s e l a h

 

[Presby02]

… but not engaging in a thing of nought. : )

s e l a h

Yet here you are trying to discuss something you know nothing about apparently. My question was simple. Except for you I guess.

 

[TomL]

If you are a child of God, why are you obsessed with this nonsensical question?

”for it is God who works in you both to will and to do for His good pleasure.” Philippians 2:13

s e l a h

He wants to defend his theology.

He holds that God has determined everyone incapable of believing on God/Christ unless he has been unconditionally predestined before the foundation of the earth to do so.

Yet at the same time, claim man has a natural ability to do so.

 

[Presby02]

He wants to defend his theology.

He holds that God has determined everyone incapable of believing on God/Christ unless he has been unconditionally predestined before the foundation of the earth to do so.

Yet at the same time, claim man has a natural ability to do so.

This post is born out of ignorance. Explain the difference between moral and natural ability.

 

[TomL]

This post is born out of ignorance. Explain the difference between moral and natural ability.

See, there he goes.

Trying to defend his theology while denying the meaning behind natural inability which was given to him multiple times.