Oh wow. Because Jesus did not speak of his divinity in clear terms (if at all) here, then you deny his divinity and preexistence. I share this passage of John 3:29 because you try to make Jesus a common man turned hero or a man turned divine, as in the Adoptionism heresy, except extended to the other followers too.This refers to Jesus' Lordship over his brothers and sisters as the bridegroom, but not as their God. Paul believed the same thing. We can draw a parallel between what Jesus said and Paul. The bridegroom (man) is the head of the bride (woman), but that the head of the bridegroom (man) is God in 1 Corinthians 11:3.
1 Corinthians 113But I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.
We can take another example in which Jesus illustrated his supremacy over his brothers, but did not go so far as to say that he is himself God.
Jesus illustrated that point by talking about himself and his disciples as part of the same vine. He said he is the true vine and that his disciples are the branches. This would mean that the vine and branches are all part of the same plant, but the Father is not part of the same plant, but rather is the keeper of the vineyard because only the Father is God and Jesus with his disciples are not God. Is this starting to make sense?
John 15
Last edited: