The Bible does not teach to pray to Jesus

This refers to Jesus' Lordship over his brothers and sisters as the bridegroom, but not as their God. Paul believed the same thing. We can draw a parallel between what Jesus said and Paul. The bridegroom (man) is the head of the bride (woman), but that the head of the bridegroom (man) is God in 1 Corinthians 11:3.

1 Corinthians 11​
3But I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

We can take another example in which Jesus illustrated his supremacy over his brothers, but did not go so far as to say that he is himself God.

Jesus illustrated that point by talking about himself and his disciples as part of the same vine. He said he is the true vine and that his disciples are the branches. This would mean that the vine and branches are all part of the same plant, but the Father is not part of the same plant, but rather is the keeper of the vineyard because only the Father is God and Jesus with his disciples are not God. Is this starting to make sense?

John 15​
1I am the true vine, and My Father is the keeper of the vineyard. 2He cuts off every branch in Me that bears no fruit, and every branch that does bear fruit, He prunes to make it even more fruitful.​
Oh wow. Because Jesus did not speak of his divinity in clear terms (if at all) here, then you deny his divinity and preexistence. I share this passage of John 3:29 because you try to make Jesus a common man turned hero or a man turned divine, as in the Adoptionism heresy, except extended to the other followers too.
 
Last edited:
Not when you omit v5. Everything is an interpretation. The bible is not reduced to one verse. But the Unitarian does that. The judges also have to take laws that appear contradictory and reconcile them for a decision. That is what happens in understanding John 17:3-5. Jesus (though before incarnation and not named "Jesus" at that time) preexisted. Your repetition of weak arguments does not add any credibility to your arguments.
The glory that Jesus was speaking about was something that he obtained in the present. It was not something he literally had before the world began. What Jesus is referring to here is the glory he had in God's foreknowledge. There is proof of this in John 17 because Jesus prayed that God loves his disciples just as He loved Jesus. Since God loved Jesus before the foundation of the world, in order for God to love the disciples just as he loved Jesus, then he would have also had to love the disciples since before the foundation of the world.

Therefore, neither Jesus nor the disciples actually pre-existed, but God, in His omniscience, foreknowledge, and predestination, has glory pre-planned for people and also love, even though they don't actually exist.

John 17
22I have given them the glory You gave Me, so that they may be one as We are one— 23I in them and You in Me—that they may be perfectly united, so that the world may know that You sent Me and have loved them just as You have loved Me.

24Father, I want those You have given Me to be with Me where I am, that they may see the glory You gave Me because You loved Me before the foundation of the world.
 
Oh wow. Because Jesus did not speak of his divinity in clear terms (if at all) here, then you deny his divinity and preexistence. I share this passage of John 3:29 because you try to make Jesus a common man turned hero or a man turned divine, as in the Adoptionism heresy, except extended to the other followers too.
God the Father is not in the vine according to Jesus. God is the keeper or vinedresser. Start there, maybe that's the key for you.
 
The glory that Jesus was speaking about was something that he obtained in the present. It was not something he literally had before the world began. What Jesus is referring to here is the glory he had in God's foreknowledge. There is proof of this in John 17 because Jesus prayed that God loves his disciples just as He loved Jesus. Since God loved Jesus before the foundation of the world, in order for God to love the disciples just as he loved Jesus, then he would have also had to love the disciples since before the foundation of the world.

Therefore, neither Jesus nor the disciples actually pre-existed, but God, in His omniscience, foreknowledge, and predestination, has glory pre-planned for people and also love, even though they don't actually exist.

John 17
22I have given them the glory You gave Me, so that they may be one as We are one— 23I in them and You in Me—that they may be perfectly united, so that the world may know that You sent Me and have loved them just as You have loved Me.

24Father, I want those You have given Me to be with Me where I am, that they may see the glory You gave Me because You loved Me before the foundation of the world.
That proves nothing of unitarian beliefs. Verse 24 favors the biblical trinitarian doctrine more than a unitarian belief. Your post here does nothing for advancing your broad interpretation.
 
God the Father is not in the vine according to Jesus. God is the keeper or vinedresser. Start there, maybe that's the key for you.
That just means that Christ in his divinity is our life and sustenance. You may have a slight change to the Trinitarian doctrine that might be considered but not one to reject Christ as the Son of God. Your arguments only seek to diminish who Christ is while you neglect the verses that show his divinity as Son of God in preexistence to his incarnation. I'm not sure how that can be convincing to anyone.
 
That proves nothing of unitarian beliefs. Verse 24 favors the biblical trinitarian doctrine more than a unitarian belief. Your post here does nothing for advancing your broad interpretation.
It's just basic exegesis built on the infallible words of Jesus who said the Father is the only true God.
 
That just means that Christ in his divinity is our life and sustenance. You may have a slight change to the Trinitarian doctrine that might be considered but not one to reject Christ as the Son of God. Your arguments only seek to diminish who Christ is while you neglect the verses that show his divinity as Son of God in preexistence to his incarnation. I'm not sure how that can be convincing to anyone.
God isn't stated to be a member of the vine. Did you catch the part where God is an external entity to Jesus and everyone else?
 
It's just basic exegesis built on the infallible words of Jesus who said the Father is the only true God.
strawman since He said He was equal with the Father and to see Him was to see the Father and the person Jesus said that to called Him his Lord and God. And John also called Him the True God and Eternal Life.

next fallacy
 
God isn't stated to be a member of the vine. Did you catch the part where God is an external entity to Jesus and everyone else?
Did you catch the multitude of verses showing the divinity of Christ? Maybe you have not refined your thinking to recognize that Jesus, as the incarnation of God's Son, is usually called Christ Jesus even though he sometimes is called God.
Are you going to limit what God can do and how God and Christ Jesus can actually work together in this without disrupting Christ Jesus's divinity?
 
strawman since He said He was equal with the Father and to see Him was to see the Father and the person Jesus said that to called Him his Lord and God. And John also called Him the True God and Eternal Life.

next fallacy
Verse?
 
We can call you the one-verse unitarian
their entire foundation in the bible is John 17:3- without that one verse ripped from its context the entire house crumbles - the fact is in the context Jesus makes Himself equal with the Father as we read in John 17:5 and 17:3- eternal life Jesus claimed equality with the Father and in Creation sharing Their mutual glory together with one another before creation.

they have nothing to support their beliefs when we actually read and exegete the context.
 
Did you catch the multitude of verses showing the divinity of Christ? Maybe you have not refined your thinking to recognize that Jesus, as the incarnation of God's Son, is usually called Christ Jesus even though he sometimes is called God.
Are you going to limit what God can do and how God and Christ Jesus can actually work together in this without disrupting Christ Jesus's divinity?
No verses in the Bible that say Jesus is God Almighty.
 
No verses in the Bible that say Jesus is God Almighty.
Wow. Shocking. Imagine God not revealing everything in Genesis 1!! I'm looking for the verse that says "Mr. Runningman, the trinity is the accurate depiction of the Godhead. Believe it." Hmm. It is not quite that simple, but does it have to be?
 
Runningman,
Write an essay explaining each verse Trinitarians use to point to aspects of the Trinity and then explain why those verses fail to do that. If you de-evangelism is that important, go ahead and write that. Convince people with the verses that we hold to.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom