Jesus denied being God

Runningman said:
Scripture.

Revelation 3
21To the one who overcomes, I will grant the right to sit with Me on My throne, just as I overcame and sat down with My Father on His throne.

Romans 8
17Now if we are children, then we are heirs—heirs of God and co-heirs with Christ, if indeed we share in his sufferings in order that we may also share in his glory.

1 Cor. 6
2Or do you not know that the Lord’s people will judge the world? And if you are to judge the world, are you not competent to judge trivial cases?

2 Timothy 2
12If we endure hardship, we will reign with him...
Click to expand...

So where are you named here?

Are you claiming that you've "overcome"?
 
Runningman said:
Christians follow what Jesus taught. He never taught anything about believing he is God or praying to him or worshipping him.

Do you know who Jesus taught to pray to, who to worship, and who to believe God is? If you do anything at all, do yourself a favor and actually read his teachings. You are being deceived by the Christ deniers.
Click to expand...

Novice. That isn't an answer. You're deflecting from the argument.

If there is only One foundation.... and it is carnal to call yourself after another man, then Jesus can't possibly be just a man.
 
praise_yeshua said:
I rightfully recognized you're a novice. You use childish arguments while denying the obvious. That is what children do. I also rightfully recognize the silly mistakes concerning the facts of reality you're ignoring.

Like there isn't a "Roman" language........

Children don't acknowledge their mistakes. When are you at least going to recognize this mistake of fact?

You are your problem. I can't avoid your problem. It is all about YOU.
Click to expand...
You can't resist yourself. I didn't say there is a Roman language. Do you know what Romanized language is? Romanization is the process of converting a language written in a non-Latin script into the Latin alphabet. That's English, sir. Jesus' real name isn't Jesus. It was Romanized, converted from Hebrew into the Latin alphabet. Please do yourself a favor and try to learn from these discussions. You are free to Google these things so they don't come back to haunt you later.
 
praise_yeshua said:
Novice. That isn't an answer. You're deflecting from the argument.

If there is only One foundation.... and it is carnal to call yourself after another man, then Jesus can't possibly be just a man.
Click to expand...
Brilliant. If he's not a man then why does the bible relatedly call him a man? You don't believe it? John 1:30,31, John 8:40, 1 Tim. 2:5, Acts 2:22, 36 etc
 
Runningman said:
You can't resist yourself. I didn't say there is a Roman language. Do you know what Romanized language is? Romanization is the process of converting a language written in a non-Latin script into the Latin alphabet. That's English, sir. Jesus' real name isn't Jesus. It was Romanized, converted from Hebrew into the Latin alphabet. Please do yourself a favor and try to learn from these discussions. You are free to Google these things so they don't come back to haunt you later.
Click to expand...

Sure you did. I know the subject well. I learned such before your generation believes everything they get from "Google".

I know Google is your source of information. You're "googling" as you go. Problem is, Google isn't always right. In fact, it is often very wrong.

Is Google your authority? Novices believe everything they "google".
 
praise_yeshua said:
Sure you did. I know the subject well. I learned such before your generation believes everything they get from "Google".

I know Google is your source of information. You're "googling" as you go. Problem is, Google isn't always right. In fact, it is often very wrong.

Is Google your authority? Novices believe everything they "google".
Click to expand...
yes between that and AI they have no argument lol.
 
praise_yeshua said:
Sure you did. I know the subject well. I learned such before your generation believes everything they get from "Google".

I know Google is your source of information. You're "googling" as you go. Problem is, Google isn't always right. In fact, it is often very wrong.

Is Google your authority? Novices believe everything they "google".
Click to expand...
I did not say there is a "Roman language" which is not something I believe or something I would say. The closest thing to that would be Latin, but Romanizing a language is a real concept. You misunderstood something I wrote, probably because you need to put your reading glasses on, formed it as a weapon against me, and only embarrassed yourself in the process when it backfired.

Case in point... quote the comment where I said that. Burden of proof is on you.
 
Runningman said:
Brilliant. If he's not a man then why does the bible relatedly call him a man? You don't believe it? John 1:30,31, John 8:40, 1 Tim. 2:5, Acts 2:22, 36 etc
Click to expand...

I used a English adverb. Just.

Evil men do what you're doing. I said very clear that Jesus can't be "just" a man.

Yet here is your evil heart on full display by ignoring the adverb I used.
 
Runningman said:
I did not say there is a "Roman language" which is not something I believe or something I would say. The closest thing to that would be Latin, but Romanizing a language is a real concept. You misunderstood something I wrote, probably because you need to put your reading glasses on, formed it as a weapon against me, and only embarrassed yourself in the process when it backfired.

Case in point... quote the comment where I said that. Burden of proof is on you.
Click to expand...

Is Google your authority? You told me I could "google" and know. Why are you avoiding this fact. I could tell you were "googling" to get your response from you first arguments.

All you Unitarians are doing this. There are very real problem with this approach. It proves that you don't know the subject yourself. You're lazy and unlearned. Novices.
 
praise_yeshua said:
Is Google your authority? You told me I could "google" and know. Why are you avoiding this fact. I could tell you were "googling" to get your response from you first arguments.

All you Unitarians are doing this. There are very real problem with this approach. It proves that you don't know the subject yourself. You're lazy and unlearned. Novices.
Click to expand...
I recommended Google to you because clearly you didn't know. You assumed I was talking about a "Roman language" when I said the language was Romanized because you didn't know what I was referring to. Just now, today, you learned something new! However, you're projecting your failures on me. Classic head in the sand response.
 
Runningman said:
I recommended Google to you because clearly you didn't know. You assumed I was talking about a "Roman language" when I said the language was Romanized because you didn't know what I was referring to. Just now, today, you learned something new! However, you're projecting your failures on me. Classic head in the sand response.
Click to expand...

So Google is your authority?

I know more than just the first two pages of returns from Google. My bet is you never get past the first page.
 

Similar threads

T
I am that I am - The angel of the Lord
Replies
19
Views
228
TomL
T
Johann
Jesus: YHWH God Incarnate
Replies
8
Views
122
Olde Tymer
Olde Tymer
civic
God is Love
2 3 4
Replies
64
Views
722
brightfame52
brightfame52
brightfame52
Jesus the Man Before John !
8 9 10
Replies
184
Views
3K
TomL
T
Johann
An Articulation of the Doctrine of the Glorious Incarnation
Replies
1
Views
70
101G
101G
Back
Top Bottom