Jesus denied being God

What college was that? I would advise people not to go to that one.

One problem or concern I see with that explanation (in the text) is that Jews were a minority of the believers such that the gospel would not likely be addressed to their mindset. That is just a quick impression. I might read more of it. But we did see someone earlier (runningman maybe?) who shared from Meyer's commentary to say Logos did not speak of Jesus. However, Meyer's expresses it does. So that argument flopped badly when not addressing Meyer's full view.

Yeah. I posted that before you decided to come clean on what you were sharing.

Tell you what. Get the "new guy" in the youtube page they have to agree to a public unedited debate. I'll gladly correct him.
Come clean means what? That none of us have teachers? That none of us were students in the same school? That you were born with your own knowledge and never learned anything from a teacher? You talk like a fool when you say the data I post is not my own just because you found someone else who believes as I do.
 
It total breaks down at

Philippians 2:5–8 (KJV 1900) — 5 Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus: 6 Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God: 7 But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men: 8 And being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross.

does an impersonal thing have a mind?

does it think?

Can it act in humility?

Make itself of no reputation?
Is Jesus an impersonal thing? Is that what you are saying?
 
You're saying the same things identically. Which means you're repeating. That Bible college sure has you trained to repeat them.
John had a couple partners and they write the same and it's in their book so since it's the same as I was taught. Then why should I type it when I already have it written out from their book?
 
Come clean means what? That none of us have teachers? That none of us were students in the same school? That you were born with your own knowledge and never learned anything from a teacher? You talk like a fool when you say the data I post is not my own just because you found someone else who believes as I do.
FOOL?
I thought your were always in the Spirit? I knew you weren't.

I graduated from listening to Bible College professors to actually doing the work myself. Apparently you haven't grown since your Bible College days?

What about the public unedited debate? You know these people so well that you repeat each other "word for word"......
 
John had a couple partners and they write the same and it's in their book so since it's the same as I was taught. Then why should I type it when I already have it written out from their book?
You shouldn't. Just rightful recognizing you're just repeating one another because you a product of bias.
 
I am saying that an impersonal thing cannot account for what is written in that passage
I have not been able to comment on this because I just do not get what you are asking. Can you explain this so that all of us can understand what's in your mind?
 
Concerning the "us" God could have been talking to any number of His spirit beings. Angels or angel like creatures and even Cherubims. Why is it that you only think God was talking to another god? And concerning Adam... does it say "exact image" or are you adding to the Bible?
NO.

The quote is

" 26Then God said, “Let Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness;

There is zero anywhere that says God had wings... but it is common to accept angels and cherubim do

There is a deception in Genesis though...

Consider when God says hen God said, “Let Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness;

Then it goes on to say...27God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them

When you move into Gen 2....

7Then the LORD God formed man of dust from the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living being.

15Then the LORD God took the man and put him into the garden of Eden to cultivate it and keep it.

18Then the LORD God said, “It is not good for the man to be alone; I will make him a helper suitable for him.” 19Out of the ground the LORD God formed every beast of the field and every bird of the sky, and brought them to the man to see what he would call them; and whatever the man called a living creature, that was its name. 20The man gave names to all the cattle, and to the birds of the sky, and to every beast of the field, but for Adam there was not found a helper suitable for him. 21So the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon the man, and he slept; then He took one of his ribs and closed up the flesh at that place. 22The LORD God fashioned into a woman the rib which He had taken from the man, and brought her to the man.

It was not til all the animals Adam was to name had been made that God realized Adam needed a mate of like kind.

But God did not form her from the ground... he formed her from Adams bone.

And at this point I will stop because you will never comprehend the implications of this.

God originally said he wanted to make man in their image. then it says God did create man in His own image... he created them male and female.

These [people were to tend and keep the whole (known) world at that time....

Adam only had to maintain Eden.

So whatever the image of YHWH, the Word, and Holy Spirit are... there is the image also of the man and woman God originally made
 
FOOL?
I thought your were always in the Spirit? I knew you weren't.

I graduated from listening to Bible College professors to actually doing the work myself. Apparently you haven't grown since your Bible College days?

What about the public unedited debate? You know these people so well that you repeat each other "word for word"......
There's no trinity. I know it and so does John. Does it really matter who wrote it down on paper?
 
NO.

The quote is

" 26Then God said, “Let Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness;

There is zero anywhere that says God had wings... but it is common to accept angels and cherubim do

There is a deception in Genesis though...

Consider when God says hen God said, “Let Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness;

Then it goes on to say...27God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them

When you move into Gen 2....

7Then the LORD God formed man of dust from the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living being.

15Then the LORD God took the man and put him into the garden of Eden to cultivate it and keep it.

18Then the LORD God said, “It is not good for the man to be alone; I will make him a helper suitable for him.” 19Out of the ground the LORD God formed every beast of the field and every bird of the sky, and brought them to the man to see what he would call them; and whatever the man called a living creature, that was its name. 20The man gave names to all the cattle, and to the birds of the sky, and to every beast of the field, but for Adam there was not found a helper suitable for him. 21So the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon the man, and he slept; then He took one of his ribs and closed up the flesh at that place. 22The LORD God fashioned into a woman the rib which He had taken from the man, and brought her to the man.

It was not til all the animals Adam was to name had been made that God realized Adam needed a mate of like kind.

But God did not form her from the ground... he formed her from Adams bone.

And at this point I will stop because you will never comprehend the implications of this.

God originally said he wanted to make man in their image. then it says God did create man in His own image... he created them male and female.

These [people were to tend and keep the whole (known) world at that time....

Adam only had to maintain Eden.

So whatever the image of YHWH, the Word, and Holy Spirit are... there is the image also of the man and woman God originally made
God is Spirit. If He said He was going to make man in His image. Then it had to be spirit because that is what God is.
 
I have not been able to comment on this because I just do not get what you are asking. Can you explain this so that all of us can understand what's in your mind?
It's simple

In this passage Jesus does things which are not possible for an impersonal non living thing
 
We are all from the same school. I know there's no trinity. John knows it too and so does the other co-students that write the same data with John.

You don't know such a thing. You got what you believed from a Bible College and never truly vetted it. You just keep repeating it. That is why you say the same things identically. It is called "parroting".

You add nothing to the conversation due to "parroting". Such is an clear indication of bias.
 
I asked if you want to deal with this in a different topic relative to this single verse. Details are important. You're just repeating what someone said. That is all it is to you. Just words that confirm your bias. That is what is to most people.

For example, it took about 2 seconds to find your reference above. They came from


Is this your website or are you just posting content without permission?

There are many "Google" theologians in this world. I've never meet one that actually knew what they claimed to know.

Use your own words. Make your own arguments. I'm not going to debate this with someone copying and pasting the theology of another. I've spent decades doing this. You don't know the times I've gotten into a debate to only have someone else abandon the topic because they were only "copy and paste" theologians.
Ditto
 
You don't know such a thing. You got what you believed from a Bible College and never truly vetted it. You just keep repeating it. That is why you say the same things identically. It is called "parroting".

You add nothing to the conversation due to "parroting". Such is an clear indication of bias.
The muck gets deeper
 
Can I ask if you went to seminary ?
I went to a college where some of us were ordained when we graduated and worked for that Christian ministry. I put all of my Bible college notes on a word processor many years ago and realized I had so much data that I could call it a book. I don't charge to look at it and so it's free to look at for anyone who feels inspired to do so.
 
Back
Top Bottom