The substitute name for Jesus was God in the Septuagint?
No the name of God was YHWH
This did not appear in the septuagint, lord English, kyrios greek did
Last edited:
The substitute name for Jesus was God in the Septuagint?
I'm not sure. There are some things I don't know. If all trinity people are saved is one of the things I don't know.
Which prophesies called Jesus God in the LXX?
We do know Jesus you do not
that thread is waste of time.I value very much your humbleness in declaring that you don't know some things.
But in this occasion, let me be a bit harsh. It is not about you, my brother. Please don't take it personal. I'm gonna be harsh on purpose, just for the sake of the debate.
If I am not sure about God granting salvation to me and my human fellows... well, what a waste of time debating on the Trinity!
I invite you, @civic, @synergy, @Runningman and @TomL to participate in the thread "The doctor and his four patients: A Parable of Faith and Works".
Amazing how our miraculous God is being denied.
The problem actually seems relevant. People who disregard the deity of Christ usually have other bad doctrines, such as legalism or they say everyone is justified without needing the blood of Christ to save them. The problem now is that the debate is not establishing Pancho's doctrine.You and @Peterlag are an intelligent and noble beings.
So don't come with the same foolishness.
This is to both of you: Stop the craze right now, please!
Unitarism is nothing.
Trinitarism is nothing.
Living the life of Christ is everything.
Who is Christ?
Let me tell you who Christ is.
Christ is the person who commanded us to love each other so that we could be identified as his disciples. That's Christ.
If you and @Peterlag recognize that person as "Christ", you are disciples of the same Christ.
Sorry it is important we know who Christ isYou and @Peterlag are an intelligent and noble beings.
So don't come with the same foolishness.
This is to both of you: Stop the craze right now, please!
Unitarism is nothing.
Trinitarism is nothing.
Living the life of Christ is everything.
Who is Christ?
Let me tell you who Christ is.
Christ is the person who commanded us to love each other so that we could be identified as his disciples. That's Christ.
If you and @Peterlag recognize that person as "Christ", you are disciples of the same Christ.
Can't. 2 Cor 4: 3-4 does not apply to us.
IndeedCan't. 2 Cor 4: 3-4 does not apply to us.
Thanks for trying. It helped confirm what we know about the Trinity. It was odd that when you were hoping for unity that your arguments were totally directed against the deity of God, which is preferable to the Baha'i faith. It would be hard to show all of those other religions have a prophet who also is shown to be of the Godhead. Their religious texts do not point toward the divine Son of the Godhead like the Bible does.Thanks for your reply, my brother.
I decided to stop debating on the Trinity.
Undeniable truth. We know the Holy Spirit is identified as God, the Son is identified as God and the Father is identified as God.Thanks for trying. It helped confirm what we know about the Trinity.
Perhaps you mean "it is important we know who the winner of the argument is"Sorry it is important we know who Christ is
Son of God is a divine name of Christ.Perhaps you mean "it is important we know who the winner of the argument is"
Jesus showed interest in Christology once during his ministry and asked his disciples who the people thought he was.
By the time Jesus asked this, He had already healed a lot of people... regardless on whether these people thought Jesus was Elijah, or John the Baptist, or another prophet, or the Messiah, or just a good healer.
Jesus asked his disciples who they thought he was.
Peter gave an answer: "You are the Messiah, the Son of God".
Jesus didn't contradict Peter.
Jesus didn't add a detailed explanation.
Jesus didn't dig deeper into Peter's mind to find out what exactly he meant
Jesus praised that answer, saying it had been revealed by The Father.
The people who participate in this thread, such as @Peterlag, @Runningman, @civic, @synergy, you and me, share Peter's conviction.
So, why would any of us think that Jesus demands from us a knowledge that He didn't demand from Peter?
If Jesus appeared to me right now and asked me "Who do you say I am?" I would reply as Peter.
Yes, I am very lazy on these things. I prefer to be on the safe side.
The problem would come when Jesus asked me "If you say I am the Messiah, the Son of God, why don't you do what I told you?"
ThomasPerhaps you mean "it is important we know who the winner of the argument is"
Jesus showed interest in Christology once during his ministry and asked his disciples who the people thought he was.
By the time Jesus asked this, He had already healed a lot of people... regardless on whether these people thought Jesus was Elijah, or John the Baptist, or another prophet, or the Messiah, or just a good healer.
Jesus asked his disciples who they thought he was.
Peter gave an answer: "You are the Messiah, the Son of God".
Jesus didn't contradict Peter.
Jesus didn't add a detailed explanation.
Jesus didn't dig deeper into Peter's mind to find out what exactly he meant
Jesus praised that answer, saying it had been revealed by The Father.
The people who participate in this thread, such as @Peterlag, @Runningman, @civic, @synergy, you and me, share Peter's conviction.
So, why would any of us think that Jesus demands from us a knowledge that He didn't demand from Peter?
If Jesus appeared to me right now and asked me "Who do you say I am?" I would reply as Peter.
Yes, I am very lazy on these things. I prefer to be on the safe side.
The problem would come when Jesus asked me "If you say I am the Messiah, the Son of God, why don't you do what I told you?"
Our choice was that Jesus be the "winner" for being recognized in all his glory. I think we have seen that almost all testified to the deity of Christ.Perhaps you mean "it is important we know who the winner of the argument is"
Jesus showed interest in Christology once during his ministry and asked his disciples who the people thought he was.
By the time Jesus asked this, He had already healed a lot of people... regardless on whether these people thought Jesus was Elijah, or John the Baptist, or another prophet, or the Messiah, or just a good healer.
Jesus asked his disciples who they thought he was.
Peter gave an answer: "You are the Messiah, the Son of God".
Jesus didn't contradict Peter.
Jesus didn't add a detailed explanation.
Jesus didn't dig deeper into Peter's mind to find out what exactly he meant
Jesus praised that answer, saying it had been revealed by The Father.
The people who participate in this thread, such as @Peterlag, @Runningman, @civic, @synergy, you and me, share Peter's conviction.
So, why would any of us think that Jesus demands from us a knowledge that He didn't demand from Peter?
If Jesus appeared to me right now and asked me "Who do you say I am?" I would reply as Peter.
Yes, I am very lazy on these things. I prefer to be on the safe side.
The problem would come when Jesus asked me "If you say I am the Messiah, the Son of God, why don't you do what I tell you?"
Son of God is a divine name of Christ.
The only and only Son.
I thought Pancho had ended his discussion on the Trinity. He did not convince us away from the testimony of scripture. (I know. it is hard to stop participating in the thread cold turkey.) Otherwise, I do think he tries to be a friendly guy.Jesus didn't ask Peter what was the meaning of "Son of God". Did He?
If for you it means "God", great. Jesus won't ask you for a definition anyway.
Will you proclaim as did Thomas and be blessedJesus didn't ask Peter what was the meaning of "Son of God". Did He?
If for you it means "God", great. Jesus won't ask you for a definition anyway.