Nope but all have that opportunitySo all are justified then?
Remember you established all equals all without exception
Nope but all have that opportunitySo all are justified then?
Exactly. You still agree with me. God exists outside of time. A plan assumes time. Hence it never mentions a plan.But you don't
You believe they were unconditionally elected to be saved before the foundation of the earth
You do not believe they were saved at that time
you do believe they were saved later in time
so your view is simply God had a plan to save those men at some future time
you cannot escape it
it was not a reality that they were saved before the foundation of the earth
therefore it can only be a plan, an intention, a purpose (chose your word)
God may exist outside of time, but you do not, and you experience salvation in time
as does everyone else.
sorry but that is absurdExactly. You still agree with me. God exists outside of time. A plan assumes time. Hence it never mentions a plan.
YepNope but all have that opportunity
Remember you established all equals all without exception
And has always known for an eternity.sorry but that is absurd
You think God does not know that you will be created and saved in time
You did not exist in eternity to be a recipient of God's plan to save which was made in eternity
Acts 2:23this Jesus, delivered up according to the definite plan and foreknowledge of God, you crucified and killed by the hands of lawless men.
Eph 3:9and to bring to light for everyone what is the plan of the mystery hidden for ages in God, who created all things,
Your idea God cannot make a plan in eternity is busted
No mention of opportunity in the text. More question begging.Nope but all have that opportunity
Remember you established all equals all without exception
True. John 3:16 isn't stating an opportunity. It is identifying those who are the believing ones.No mention of opportunity in the text. More question begging.
Correct-True. John 3:16 isn't stating an opportunity. It is identifying those who are the believing ones.
16 for God did so love the world, that His Son -- the only begotten -- He gave, that every one who is believing in him may not perish, but may have life age-during.
Here is the Greek text of John 3:16:"For in this way God loved the world, so that he gave his one and only Son, in order that everyone who believes in him will not perish, but will have eternal life."
Οὕτως γὰρ ἠγάπησεν ὁ Θεὸς τὸν κόσμον, ὥστε τὸν υἱὸν τὸν μονογενῆ ἔδωκεν, ἵνα πᾶς ὁ πιστεύων εἰς αὐτὸν μὴ ἀπόληται ἀλλ᾽ ἔχῃ ζωὴν αἰώνιον.
And has always known for an eternity.
It's a plan from our perspective, not His.
Gnostics and modern Masons believe that GOD is a duality in that they believe HE is both good and evil and creates both good and evil as per the superficial reading of Isa 45:7. I suggest that the belief that GOD creates sinners by any means such as by the surrogate Adam, is a gnostic holdover from the early days when such ideas were not so fine tuned.
I slide such ideas into conversations to help people think about this contradiction within the orthodox doctrines of our creation and fall...so thanks for asking.
Since I accept that people are sinners at conception because death proves sin, and since I reject that GOD creates sinfulness by any means I must conclude that our conception cannot be our creation.
The problem is that there have been millenia of counter translations and interpretations to our pre-earth existence that no one even sees the pce implications of the hints to our pce found in either testament. Since ordinary interpretations seem logical as supports for church doctrine, it is easy to pass them over a hints to a pre-conception existence.
Your use of the word evidence rather than proof is meaningful but I think that perhaps there is a tinge of 'no proof' within this lack of evidence in that if a verse CAN be interpreted for pce without doing it any damage then, though it is not proof it should be interpreted as a pce support, it certainly must be included as evidence for such support. I know of some 3 dozen verses which can be seen as support, evidence, for PCE Theology but I have never counted how many are NT verses and, for myself, I do not suggest they prove our pre-conception existence. But without a study of the verses there is no way that a theologically minded person can withstand the eisegetic interpretations which support their chosen pov. Iow, merely listing the verses would achieve nothing, sigh.
My current favorite is the parable of the weeds, Matt 13:27-30 and especially the explanation of the parable in verses Matt 13:36-39, which makes no sense at all within favourite theologies.
I also like to repeat my desire for someone to find me a verse which claims or even hints that our pre-earth existence is impossible… After some 15 years of asking, no one has presented one yet.
...fashioned to be flesh can be interpreted without damage to the words as written to mean that his body was fashioned as the reciprocal for his spirit sown into his body by the breath of GOD, Matt 13:38.
We each have our eisegetical interpretation of these words as our pov instructs us.
He says it...over and over and over!Thank you. So it's not what He knows it who He knows.
remember you already affirmed all = all without exceptionNo mention of opportunity in the text. More question begging.
So what you just refuted yourselfAnd has always known for an eternity.
It's a plan from our perspective, not His.
Shot himself in the foot
ExactlyShot himself in the foot
All men in the first half of the verse must equal all men in the second half
Romans 5:18 (KJV 1900) — 18 Therefore as by the offence of one judgment came upon all men to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life.
Don't you think we are created as sinners here on earth? Or death praves sinfulness in infants as well as in older folk? I thought these doctrines were pretty stable across the theological board...Well I certainly have never believed that God creates Evil. I just believe that "evil" has not affect upon God.
We are born peccable. Capable of sin. Bad things happen to humanity because we are no longer under the direct care of God as was Adam and Eve. God drove them from safety to "have it their way". This results in inevitable sin among us today but I do not believe it was so "from the beginning". The world before the flood abandoned God completely and this resulted what is referenced in Romans "there is none righteous. They have gone out of the way". Jesus reference how Moses suffered mankind to divorce but from the beginning it was not so.Don't you think we are created as sinners here on earth? Or death praves sinfulness in infants as well as in older folk? I thought these doctrines were pretty stable across the theological board...
Okay. Clearly this conversation is above your pay grade. Good talkSo what you just refuted yourself