I'm talking about abrogated ordinances, Judaizers, and Paul's chastisement of them. You, on the other hand, are rambling about Jews in general and Romans. Why are you changing the topic? Try to stay on topic. Is that possible for you? Here are my questions again: Are you still holding onto abrogated ordinance such as Circumcision? Do you still practice Temple burnt offerings? You remind me of Peter's Judaizing phase when he came under severe chastising by Paul for doing so. That's what Judaizers deserve, to come under the chastisement of your favorite Apostle of all times Paul.I didn't dance around it. Correct understanding refuted your erroneous interpretation.
Thousands and thousands of Jews became born-again, and after their conversion to Christ was now able to obey the Law of Moses correctly and perfectly.
If God hasn't received Israel as His people, then how do you explain three thousand born again Jews on Pentecost and thousands more as the days passed?
There is no failure on the part of the people. It was the religious leaders that sought to kill Jesus, and they fell right into the plan of God for His Son. But these same religious leaders came to faith in Jesus as the years passed. Acts 6:7 records that a "great company" of priests came to faith. A "great company" sounds like a majority of 70 priests in the Sanhedrin. It could very well be two-thirds or even three-fourths of 70 became born-again. And this taking place puts a damper on Gentile belief that God judged Israel for killing their king. The majority of Jews lived in Gentile lands and didn't even know about Jesus. How can God judge them not knowing anything about what took place in Israel for three years during Jesus' ministry. It was a remnant that returned to rebuild their land thanks to Cyrus. But the majority of Jews remained in what was Assyria and in Babylon and in Gentile lands in-between. They knew nothing about Jesus. This was the reason why Jesus sent out the eleven disciples before He ascended and that was to herald the message from God to them that Messiah and King had come and left and will be back again, to let them know that God has kept His Promise, and the New Covenant era was upon them.
The Romans occupied Israel around 63 BC and, in that time, there were eventual pitched battles happening in AD 66 and AD 68 before the Jews were finally defeated. I don't see God's judgment upon Israel for the religious leaders assassinating Jesus. The fact that Jews were coming to their Lord and becoming born-again by thousands doesn't look like a judgment upon Israel for what happened to His Son.
And all these conversions to Israel's Messiah and King served them well for they were now able to obey every aspect of the Law of Moses completely and perfectly.
20 And when they heard it, they glorified the Lord, and said unto him, [Saul], Thou seest, brother, how many thousands of Jews there are which believe; and they are all zealous of the law: Acts 21:19–20.
Even Saul, after he was converted, continued to observe and obey the Law of Moses.
24 Them take, and purify thyself with them, and be at charges with them, that they may shave their heads: and all may know that those things, whereof they were informed concerning thee, are nothing; but that thou thyself also walkest orderly, and keepest the law. Acts 21:24.
And why not? They were deemed "Not Guilty!" by God and this was their justification. If thousands and thousands of Jews were becoming born-again and justified "Not Guilty!" by God the Father, then where does this teaching come from that Israel was under God's judgment for His Son. Does being declared "Not Guilty!" by God sound like judgment? No, it is not judgment but absolution, forgiveness, and restoration and fulfillment of the Jeremiah prophecy:
33 But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel;
After those days, saith the LORD,
I will put my law in their inward parts,
And write it in their hearts;
And will be their God,
And they shall be my people.
Jer. 31:33.
Sounds like the Marriage Supper is still on!
Do you agree?
BTW, I counted 6 times on how you made use of or quoted the word "but" to promote your points but you did not offer the same consideration to the word "but" in Matt 5:39. Your "Sainthood" is obvious to all. Congratulations.
![Clapping hands :clap: 👏](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f44f.png)