Diserner
Well-known member
it is becoming too personal and divides the brothers.
Debate brings out the flesh, but we are called to love those in error.
it is becoming too personal and divides the brothers.
Correct.Debate brings out the flesh, but we are called to love those in error.
The question becomes who is correctCorrect.
If you believe Christ was forsaken in the Atonement then just how can we fulfill "bearing His reproach".
The point of Jesus taking my punishment is so I can rest easy knowing I never will.
You know you are. I am too. We are all still chastened. We all still suffer for our sins in this life.
I wish I could convince you brother. I wish I could. Your view of sin is problematic. Most have the same issue.
Not what the sin deserves. Discipline is different—
You don't know what you are talking about.
When was the last time you directly asked God to show you any deception and sin in your life?
A day has not gone by in 25 years I have not earnestly asked God this.
I am not the one who is deceived here.
Isaiah 53:4 (ESV) — 4 Surely he has borne our griefs and carried our sorrows; yet we esteemed him stricken, smitten by God, and afflicted.Isaiah 53:10 states that the Messiah was to be a Trespass Offering, and this chapter is quoted in the New Testament:
Isaiah 53:1 is quoted in John 12:38 and Romans 10:16,
Isaiah 53:4 is quoted in Matthew 8:17,
Isaiah 53:5,6 is quoted in 1 Peter 2:24,25,
Isaiah 53:9 is quoted in 1 Peter 2:23, and
Isaiah 53:12 is quoted in Luke 22:37.
In the famous messianic prophecy of Isaiah 53:10, speaking about the death of Jesus the Messiah, it states that God will make Him an offering for sin. The word for offering for guilt is asham, which has to do with the Trespass Offering, meaning that Jesus removed the harmful effects of our Trespass sins.
I notice I am under "continual violation of long posts" Not done on purpose and have asked the @Administrator to edit when he sees fit.
--This is to show you are in error.--
------------------------------------------------------------
You-
No one in the NT as I have proven quotes Is 53:4 or 10. The 2 passages PSA is founded upon.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shalom
J.
No sin imputed to him, but only a substitute for us, and he was not abandon by God. 101G say again, he was NOT abandon by GodYes it was the will of God that he might make atonement for the people
Nothing there however about sin being imputed to Christ and suffering the wrath of and being abandoned by God as he was now an imputed sinner
Well PSA holds sin is imputed to ChristNo sin imputed to him, but only a substitute for us, and he was not abandon by God. 101G say again, he was NOT abandon by God
101G.,
101G can careless what PSA holds.Well PSA holds sin is imputed to Christ
you can assume nothing... (smile)Can I therefore assume you do not hold to PSA?
So you want to defend the Penal substitutionary atonement theory, and you do not care what it states?101G can careless what PSA holds.
you can assume nothing... (smile)
101G.
It’s looking like several people have jumped on that bandwagon lol.So you want to defend the Penal substitutionary atonement theory, and you do not care what it states?
Got it
Its a wagon with no wheelsIt’s looking like several people have jumped on that bandwagon lol.
And a dead horseIts a wagon with no wheels
And the sides are falling offAnd a dead horse
In the desert of Death Valley with no waterAnd the sides are falling off