praise_yeshua
Active Member
A challenge for all forum participants.....
Often time "modalists" will reference the "Echad" in their particular "oneness" positions. I've been asked multiple times on this forum...
"Do you believe in the Echad". To which, I have replied "no" multiple times.
There is a reason for why I respond this way. The conversation usually ends because both sides of the debate don't know how to respond to me. However, most everyone should already know why. So tell me...Most Trinitarians will often use the "Echad" as defense of the Trinity.
Then, as a Trinitarian, why would I reject the use of "Echad" in the defense of the Trinity?
Since so many of you say you know the "Trinity" (whether for it or against it). Tell me why I would chose not to. I'm a reasoned person. I have reasoned positions on all these subjects. You're not going to find this answer by Googling or asking your "AI" of choice. What I believe comes from study and experience.
Thus, the challenge. Show me what you know.....
Often time "modalists" will reference the "Echad" in their particular "oneness" positions. I've been asked multiple times on this forum...
"Do you believe in the Echad". To which, I have replied "no" multiple times.
There is a reason for why I respond this way. The conversation usually ends because both sides of the debate don't know how to respond to me. However, most everyone should already know why. So tell me...Most Trinitarians will often use the "Echad" as defense of the Trinity.
Then, as a Trinitarian, why would I reject the use of "Echad" in the defense of the Trinity?
Since so many of you say you know the "Trinity" (whether for it or against it). Tell me why I would chose not to. I'm a reasoned person. I have reasoned positions on all these subjects. You're not going to find this answer by Googling or asking your "AI" of choice. What I believe comes from study and experience.
Thus, the challenge. Show me what you know.....
