Doctrine of Unconditional Election

We know Election is unconditional as we see how God chose the father of the faithful Abraham out from his native Idolatry Neh 9:7

7 Thou art the Lord the God, who didst choose Abram, and broughtest him forth out of Ur of the Chaldees, and gavest him the name of Abraham;

This was a Sovereign Selection of Abraham, and the Elect are his seed and he was a pattern Isa 41:8

But thou, Israel, art my servant, Jacob whom I have chosen, the seed of Abraham my friend.

True Believers are that chosen seed Gal 3 7

7 Know ye therefore that they which are of faith, the same are the children of Abraham.

Meaning if we are chosen we will be of Faith sooner or later, for Faith is a gift to the chosen seed of Abraham.

Does anyone say, Oh, but God chose Abraham because He foresaw that Abraham would choose Him. I answer, the case is precisely the reverse of this. He chose Abraham just because He saw that otherwise Abraham would not choose Him. It was God’s foreseeing that Abraham would not choose Him that made election necessary.
 
You're admitting that you're conflating sanctification with Regeneration. You've just implicated yourself. This was just too easy.
Another able bible teacher writes:

‘Through sanctification of the Spirit and belief of the gospel.’ Election is not salvation, but unto salvation. Those elected must be regenerated, born again, called by the Holy Spirit to genuine repentance towards God and faith in the Lord Jesus. The Holy Spirit is the agent and the word of God is the seed, instrument or foundation of faith. There is a threefold sanctification of the believer: set apart by the Father (Jude 1:1), made holy and unblamable by Christ (1 Corinthians 1:2), and regenerated and progressively sanctified by the Spirit and the word (2 Thessalonians 2:13).
 
One problem. You forget what the words that shall be saved (future tense) and what the word UNTO means. Unto means you don't have it yet until you DO the prior.

That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved. 10For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation. Rom 10:9,10

So you're going to tell me that believing in your heart that Jesus was raised from the dead, wasn't a must to do before one is saved! The text above says you do this FIRST and now watch the tenses....."thou shalt be saved" that's future after you DO the first. There's your condition so I encourage you get rid of your false gospel.
Rockson,

This is very easy to answer if the poster to whom you posted to does not, then I will.

I do not mine posting to you since you at least show patience and godly sincerity ~ plus, you seem to carefully read what is posted, which is important in order to have a reasonable discussion, whether or not we ever agree, at least we can discuss scriptures.
 
Tom, I'm not wasting my time with you, I have on several occasions, never again, (at least for now) since you truly do not know how to dialogue properly in a profitable discussion.

Here is one reason why it is impossible to reason with folks like you:

Everyone has an excuse. But the old saying those who can do and those who cannot make excuses rings true
This verse has not one thing to do with being the saviour of men in a spiritual sense, but the context proves it is speaking about being the Saviour of men physical needs, foods, etc.
Lets see

1 Timothy 4:10
For therefore we both labour and suffer reproach, because we trust in the living God, who is the Saviour of all men, specially of those that believe.

Yours is certainly is a novel and limited interpretation. One rejected by a number of your peers

Who is the Saviour of all men. This must be understood as denoting that he is the Saviour of all men in some sense which differs from what is immediately affirmed—“especially of those that believe.” There is something pertaining to them in regard to salvation which does not pertain to “all men.” It cannot mean that he brings all men to heaven, especially those who believe—for this would be nonsense. And if he brings all men actually to heaven, how can it be especially true that he does this in regard to those who believe? Does it mean that he saves others without believing? But this would be contrary to the uniform doctrine of the Scriptures; see Mark 16:16. When, therefore, it is said that he “is the Saviour of all men, especially of those that believe,” it must mean that there is a sense in which it is true that he may be called the Saviour of all men, while, at the same time, it is actually true that those only are saved who believe. This may be true in two respects. (1.) As he is the Preserver of men (Job 7:20), for in this sense he may be said to save them from famine, and war, and peril—keeping them from day to day; comp. Ps. 107:28; (2.) as he has provided salvation for all men. He is thus their Saviour—and may be called the common Saviour of all; that is, he has confined the offer of salvation to no one class of men; he has not limited the atonement to one division of the human race; and he actually saves all who are willing to be saved by him.

Albert Barnes, Notes on the New Testament: I Thessalonians to Philemon (ed. Robert Frew; London: Blackie & Son, 1884–1885), 167–168.


To this end (εἰς τουτο [eis touto]). The godliness (εὐσεβεια [eusebeia]) of verse 8. See 2 Cor. 6:10 as Paul’s own commentary. We labour (κοπιωμεν [kopiōmen], Col. 1:29) and strive (και ἀγωνιζομεθα [kai agōnizometha], Col. 1:29). Both Pauline words. Because we have set our hope (ὁτι ἐλπικαμεν [hoti elpikamen]). Perfect active indicative of ἐλπιζω [elpizō] (Rom. 15:12). Saviour of all men (σωτηρ παντων ἀνθρωπων [sōtēr pantōn anthrōpōn]). See 1:1 for σωτηρ [sōtēr] applied to God as here. Not that all men “are saved” in the full sense, but God gives life (6:13) to all (Acts 17:28). Specially of them that believe (μαλιστα πιστων [malista pistōn]). Making a distinction in the kinds of salvation meant. “While God is potentially Saviour of all, He is actually Saviour of the πιστοι [pistoi]” (White). So Jesus is termed “Saviour of the World” (John 4:42). Cf. Gal. 6:10.


1 Timothy 4:


A.T. Robertson, Word Pictures in the New Testament (Nashville, TN: Broadman Press, 1933), 1 Ti 4:10–12.





I do not care to enter into a discuss with you, you seem to me to be a very unreasonable person that has no desire to know the truth, you only seeks to disrupt and hinder the truth.

Lol I think you are unreasonable but for the sake of others I will engage with you

I posted no less than 12 proofs and all you address is one

1 Timothy 2:4–6
4 Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth. 5 For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus; 6 Who gave himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time.
Romans 5:18
Therefore as by the offence of one judgment came upon all men to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life.
Hebrews 2:9
But we see Jesus, who was made a little lower than the angels for the suffering of death, crowned with glory and honour; that he by the grace of God should taste death for every man.
Isaiah 53:6
All we like sheep have gone astray; We have turned every one to his own way; And the LORD hath laid on him the iniquity of us all.
1 Timothy 4:10
For therefore we both labour and suffer reproach, because we trust in the living God, who is the Saviour of all men, specially of those that believe.
John 6:51
I am the living bread which came down from heaven: if any man eat of this bread, he shall live for ever: and the bread that I will give is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world.
2 Corinthians 5:14–15
14 For the love of Christ constraineth us; because we thus judge, that if one died for all, then were all dead: 15 And that he died for all, that they which live should not henceforth live unto themselves, but unto him which died for them, and rose again.
John 11:51
And this spake he not of himself: but being high priest that year, he prophesied that Jesus should die for that nation;
1 John 2:2
And he is the propitiation for our sins: and not for ours only, but also for the sins of the whole world.
2 Corinthians 5:19
To wit, that God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them; and hath committed unto us the word of reconciliation.
2 Peter 3:9
The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.


even judas

Luke 22:14–23 (KJV 1900) — 14 And when the hour was come, he sat down, and the twelve apostles with him. 15 And he said unto them, With desire I have desired to eat this passover with you before I suffer: 16 For I say unto you, I will not any more eat thereof, until it be fulfilled in the kingdom of God. 17 And he took the cup, and gave thanks, and said, Take this, and divide it among yourselves: 18 For I say unto you, I will not drink of the fruit of the vine, until the kingdom of God shall come. 19 And he took bread, and gave thanks, and brake it, and gave unto them, saying, This is my body which is given for you: this do in remembrance of me. 20 Likewise also the cup after supper, saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood, which is shed for you. 21 But, behold, the hand of him that betrayeth me is with me on the table. 22 And truly the Son of man goeth, as it was determined: but woe unto that man by whom he is betrayed! 23 And they began to inquire among themselves, which of them it was that should do this thing.

a rather feeble attempt
 
Paul Illustrated how election is unconditional with the Twins Rom 9:11-13

11 (For the children being not yet born, neither having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand, not of works, but of him that calleth)

12 It was said unto her, The elder shall serve the younger.

13 As it is written, Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated.
You just repeated yourself without any attempt to show other than service is in view
 
Everyone has an excuse. But the old saying those who can do and those who cannot make excuses rings true

Lets see

1 Timothy 4:10
For therefore we both labour and suffer reproach, because we trust in the living God, who is the Saviour of all men, specially of those that believe.

Yours is certainly is a novel and limited interpretation. One rejected by a number of your peers

Who is the Saviour of all men. This must be understood as denoting that he is the Saviour of all men in some sense which differs from what is immediately affirmed—“especially of those that believe.” There is something pertaining to them in regard to salvation which does not pertain to “all men.” It cannot mean that he brings all men to heaven, especially those who believe—for this would be nonsense. And if he brings all men actually to heaven, how can it be especially true that he does this in regard to those who believe? Does it mean that he saves others without believing? But this would be contrary to the uniform doctrine of the Scriptures; see Mark 16:16. When, therefore, it is said that he “is the Saviour of all men, especially of those that believe,” it must mean that there is a sense in which it is true that he may be called the Saviour of all men, while, at the same time, it is actually true that those only are saved who believe. This may be true in two respects. (1.) As he is the Preserver of men (Job 7:20), for in this sense he may be said to save them from famine, and war, and peril—keeping them from day to day; comp. Ps. 107:28; (2.) as he has provided salvation for all men. He is thus their Saviour—and may be called the common Saviour of all; that is, he has confined the offer of salvation to no one class of men; he has not limited the atonement to one division of the human race; and he actually saves all who are willing to be saved by him.

Albert Barnes, Notes on the New Testament: I Thessalonians to Philemon (ed. Robert Frew; London: Blackie & Son, 1884–1885), 167–168.


To this end (εἰς τουτο [eis touto]). The godliness (εὐσεβεια [eusebeia]) of verse 8. See 2 Cor. 6:10 as Paul’s own commentary. We labour (κοπιωμεν [kopiōmen], Col. 1:29) and strive (και ἀγωνιζομεθα [kai agōnizometha], Col. 1:29). Both Pauline words. Because we have set our hope (ὁτι ἐλπικαμεν [hoti elpikamen]). Perfect active indicative of ἐλπιζω [elpizō] (Rom. 15:12). Saviour of all men (σωτηρ παντων ἀνθρωπων [sōtēr pantōn anthrōpōn]). See 1:1 for σωτηρ [sōtēr] applied to God as here. Not that all men “are saved” in the full sense, but God gives life (6:13) to all (Acts 17:28). Specially of them that believe (μαλιστα πιστων [malista pistōn]). Making a distinction in the kinds of salvation meant. “While God is potentially Saviour of all, He is actually Saviour of the πιστοι [pistoi]” (White). So Jesus is termed “Saviour of the World” (John 4:42). Cf. Gal. 6:10.
You quoting Albert Barnes a very mild Calvinist, is the very reason that I'm not a Calvinist, in the sense in which Calvinism is called. Please note above what I posted:
Here is where we greatly differ from Arminians and Calvinists alike about justification, whom we find to be very similar on this doctrine, when we press them for definitions. Arminians hold conditional justification – faith is the human condition for righteousness.
I do not consider Albert Barnes one of my peers, I have attempted to read behind him many years ago, yet he was as dry as crackers without some form of liquid! You quoting him proved my point above.
 
You quoting Albert Barnes a very mild Calvinist, is the very reason that I'm not a Calvinist, in the sense in which Calvinism is called. Please note above what I posted:

I do not consider Albert Barnes one of my peers, I have attempted to read behind him many years ago, yet he was as dry as crackers without some form of liquid! You quoting him proved my point above.
Nope all that was proven is you don't like Barne's

Note I also quoted A.T. Robertson another Calvinist

To this end (εἰς τουτο [eis touto]). The godliness (εὐσεβεια [eusebeia]) of verse 8. See 2 Cor. 6:10 as Paul’s own commentary. We labour (κοπιωμεν [kopiōmen], Col. 1:29) and strive (και ἀγωνιζομεθα [kai agōnizometha], Col. 1:29). Both Pauline words. Because we have set our hope (ὁτι ἐλπικαμεν [hoti elpikamen]). Perfect active indicative of ἐλπιζω [elpizō] (Rom. 15:12). Saviour of all men (σωτηρ παντων ἀνθρωπων [sōtēr pantōn anthrōpōn]). See 1:1 for σωτηρ [sōtēr] applied to God as here. Not that all men “are saved” in the full sense, but God gives life (6:13) to all (Acts 17:28). Specially of them that believe (μαλιστα πιστων [malista pistōn]). Making a distinction in the kinds of salvation meant. “While God is potentially Saviour of all, He is actually Saviour of the πιστοι [pistoi]” (White). So Jesus is termed “Saviour of the World” (John 4:42). Cf. Gal. 6:10.


1 Timothy 4:


A.T. Robertson, Word Pictures in the New Testament (Nashville, TN: Broadman Press, 1933), 1 Ti 4:10–12.

As well as many verses of scripture

1 Timothy 2:4–6
4 Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth. 5 For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus; 6 Who gave himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time.
Romans 5:18
Therefore as by the offence of one judgment came upon all men to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life.
Hebrews 2:9
But we see Jesus, who was made a little lower than the angels for the suffering of death, crowned with glory and honour; that he by the grace of God should taste death for every man.
Isaiah 53:6
All we like sheep have gone astray; We have turned every one to his own way; And the LORD hath laid on him the iniquity of us all.
1 Timothy 4:10
For therefore we both labour and suffer reproach, because we trust in the living God, who is the Saviour of all men, specially of those that believe.
John 6:51
I am the living bread which came down from heaven: if any man eat of this bread, he shall live for ever: and the bread that I will give is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world.
2 Corinthians 5:14–15
14 For the love of Christ constraineth us; because we thus judge, that if one died for all, then were all dead: 15 And that he died for all, that they which live should not henceforth live unto themselves, but unto him which died for them, and rose again.
John 11:51
And this spake he not of himself: but being high priest that year, he prophesied that Jesus should die for that nation;
1 John 2:2
And he is the propitiation for our sins: and not for ours only, but also for the sins of the whole world.
2 Corinthians 5:19
To wit, that God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them; and hath committed unto us the word of reconciliation.
2 Peter 3:9
The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.


even judas

Luke 22:14–23 (KJV 1900) — 14 And when the hour was come, he sat down, and the twelve apostles with him. 15 And he said unto them, With desire I have desired to eat this passover with you before I suffer: 16 For I say unto you, I will not any more eat thereof, until it be fulfilled in the kingdom of God. 17 And he took the cup, and gave thanks, and said, Take this, and divide it among yourselves: 18 For I say unto you, I will not drink of the fruit of the vine, until the kingdom of God shall come. 19 And he took bread, and gave thanks, and brake it, and gave unto them, saying, This is my body which is given for you: this do in remembrance of me. 20 Likewise also the cup after supper, saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood, which is shed for you. 21 But, behold, the hand of him that betrayeth me is with me on the table. 22 And truly the Son of man goeth, as it was determined: but woe unto that man by whom he is betrayed! 23 And they began to inquire among themselves, which of them it was that should do this thing.

which you did not address

Ps note Paul's consistency in the epistle to Timothy


1 Timothy 4:10
For therefore we both labour and suffer reproach, because we trust in the living God, who is the Saviour of all men, specially of those that believe.

1 Timothy 2:4–6
4 Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth. 5 For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus; 6 Who gave himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time

As well as Paul in all his works

Romans 5:18
Therefore as by the offence of one judgment came upon all men to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life.

2 Corinthians 5:14–15
14 For the love of Christ constraineth us; because we thus judge, that if one died for all, then were all dead: 15 And that he died for all, that they which live should not henceforth live unto themselves, but unto him which died for them, and rose again.

2 Corinthians 5:19
To wit, that God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them; and hath committed unto us the word of reconciliation.
 
You danced around the jugular topic without even telling what is Calvinism's jugular. Every religion has a jugular. Christianity's jugular is that Christ is God. Prove that wrong and Christianity dies.
I do not disagree that every form of religion has doctrine (s) that that will prove them to be false~no problem with me on that point. Christ's resurrection from the dead is the main jugular for our faith~for if Christ did not raise from the dead, then our faith is vain and we all will perish in our sins!
Jesus" resurrection from the dead proved that he was indeed the Son of the Living God, thus equal with God in all of his infinite attributes.
False. The 3 Divine Persons of the Trinity have always had each other and as such none of them were ever alone.
Let civic start a new thread on this subject, and I'll come and explain the incarnate Sonship of Jesus Christ, the doctrine I know the word of God will support, the eternal Sonship is false, a doctrine promoted by the man of sin, and cannot be supported by scriptures. Some very sincere Christians have never thought through this subject, thereby, assume a position that they have always heard to be true, when in fact it was promoted by the RCC, and its Nicene Creed.

I would rewrite what you wrote in view of the fact that our God is Trinitarian. God's Word and God's Spirit are Persons and all 3 Persons shared fellowship with each other perpetually and forever. Are you sure you're Trinitarian?
Absolutely, according to each other's role in the redemption of God's elect, per 2nd Corinthians 13:14.
There's only ONE God that is manifest as three~There's only ONE Spirit of God, not two, three, etc.; God is a Spirit, that has never changed and never will, impossible. God lives in eternity, always has, always will, that will never change, no, not never. The Word in the beginning was God, without qualifications. The Word joined himself to the tabernacle of Jesus of Nazareth, who was begotten by the power of the HIghest, thus making him ONE with his Father in his deity sharing all of the attributes of His Father. If God was his Father, and he was, that made him equal to God, even his enemies understood this blessed truth.

Jesus was the only begotten Son of God, begotten in the manner in which he was begotten according to Luke chapter one. THe only record w have of his conception by God in the womb of Mary his mother. Jesus was not eternally begotten as the Nicene Creed taught. That teaching destroys in deity as God! Jesus was a complex person, fully God, fully man, that lived in this world for around thirty three years. HIs two natures never interacted with each other, even though ever present. A mystery of godliness indeed. Later when a thread is started. You might want to do your homework on the subject of Eternal Sonship verses the Incarnate Sonship before debating the subject. Both believe in the deity of Jesus Christ, but one school of thought actually ends up making Jesus a begotten "god".
 
What is the doctrine of divine election unto salvation? It is that Biblical truth that God, in sovereign mercy, before the world began and without any consideration of the actions of any man, decreed a specific number of people to be the objects of His great salvation in Christ Jesus. “...And as many as were ordained unto eternal life believed” (Acts 13:48). These would be reconciled, redeemed, justified, sanctified and gloried to “the praise of the glory of His grace” (Ephesians 1:3-6). “For He saith to Moses, I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom Iwill have compassion” (Romans 9:15). It is obvious from the language of Scripture that God has an elect or chosen people. “Who shall lay anything to the charge of God’s elect? It is God that justifieth” (Romans 8:33). “...Ye are a chosen generation” (1 Peter 2:9). “God hath from the beginning chosen you to salvation” (2 Thessalonians 2:13). If the Holy Spirit ever shows a man his sinfulness and what abundant mercy God has showered upon him in choosing him to be an object of saving grace, such a sight will have definite effects Authored by Jim Byrd

 
What is the doctrine of divine election unto salvation? It is that Biblical truth that God, in sovereign mercy, before the world began and without any consideration of the actions of any man, decreed a specific number of people to be the objects of His great salvation in Christ Jesus. “...And as many as were ordained unto eternal life believed” (Acts 13:48). These would be reconciled, redeemed, justified, sanctified and gloried to “the praise of the glory of His grace” (Ephesians 1:3-6).
There is no mention of unconditional election in the verse. Many would appeal to foreknowledge.

Luke’s statement, and as many as were ordained to eternal life believed, receives a most illuminating treatment by Dummelow:

This expresses the Pauline and Apostolic doctrine of predestination, according to which God desires the salvation of all men (1 Tim. 2:4; 4:10, etc.), but insomuch as He foresees that some (in the exercise of their free will) will actually repent and believe, while others will refuse to do so, He ordains the former to eternal life, and the latter to eternal death (Rom. 8:28–30, etc.).1

1 Charles W. Carter, “The Acts of the Apostles,” in Matthew-Acts (vol. 4; The Wesleyan Bible Commentary; Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1966), 4572.

This expresses the Pauline and Apostolic doctrine of predestination, according to which God desires the salvation of all men (1 Tim. 2:4; 4:10, etc.), but insomuch as He foresees that some (in the exercise of their free will) will actually repent and believe, while others will refuse to do so, He ordains the former to eternal life, and the latter to eternal death (Rom. 8:28–30, etc.).1

1 Charles W. Carter, “The Acts of the Apostles,” in Matthew-Acts (vol. 4; The Wesleyan Bible Commentary; Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1966), 4572.

Still others believe disposed is a better translation of Tasso

The question is this: how can this be reconciled with the Arminian (non-Calvinist) view? The key lies in the form of the main Greek verb, tassō. The basic meaning of this verb is “to place, to order, to appoint, to ordain, to determine, to arrange in order.” As it appears in this text, the verb form is the participle tetagmenoi. It is simply assumed that this is the PASSIVE form of the verb, thus: “to be appointed, to be ordained, to be destined.” What is often forgotten is that in the Greek language, often the passive and the middle form of verbs are spelled exactly the same way. That is the case here. The word tetagmenoi can also be the MIDDLE form of the verb. Here is the main point: that is how it should be understood in Acts 13:48.

What does this verse mean, then? The middle voice of a verb in Greek is sometimes used in a reflexive sense. The idea is that the action of the verb is something performed by the subject (not by someone else upon the subject), but in such a way that the action is directed back toward the subject or the self. Understanding that the verb means “to place, to set, to arrange in a certain order or position,” we can see that the statement in 13:48 can quite validly be taken thus: “As many as arranged themselves unto (eis) eternal life believed,” or “As many as turned themselves toward eternal life believed,” or “As many as disposed themselves toward eternal life believed.”

Why should we accept this approach to the verb—i.e., as middle voice rather than passive? For two reasons. First, it agrees with the general overall teaching of Scripture, that turning toward God is a matter of free will and personal responsibility, not something unconditionally and irresistibly caused by God.

Second, this agrees with the context, where the Jews’ response to the gospel is being contrasted with that of the Gentiles. In Acts 13:13-41 Paul preached a powerful Sabbath sermon in the Jews’ synagogue at Antioch. Many of the Jews were so impressed that they asked for an encore the next Sabbath (vv. 42-43). Then on “the next Sabbath almost the whole city gathered to hear the word of the Lord” (v. 44). This crowd obviously included many Gentiles, because “when the Jews saw the crowds, they were filled with jealousy and began to contradict what was spoken by Paul, reviling him” (v. 45). This provoked Paul and Barnabas to speak this judgment upon the Jews: “It was necessary that the word of God be spoken first to you. Since you thrust it aside and judge yourselves unworthy of eternal life, behold, we are turning to the Gentiles” (v. 46). This verse is important because it shows that the exclusion of the Jews from the ranks of the saved was their own choice, not the result of some predestining activity of God. The Jews specifically judged themselves unworthy of eternal life.

This is exactly the opposite of the Gentiles’ reaction, especially when Paul and Barnabas applied Isaiah 49:6 to themselves: “I have made you a light for the Gentiles, that you may bring salvation to the ends of the earth” (v. 47). Verse 48 then describes the reaction of the Gentiles to this preaching. It was in fact just the opposite of the Jews’ reaction: “And when the Gentiles heard this, they began rejoicing and glorifying the word of the Lord.” Then follow the crucial words: and as many as set themselves toward eternal life believed. How did they set themselves toward eternal life? By hearing and heeding the word of God (see Rom. 10:17).

We cannot ignore the symmetrical contrast between the reaction of the Jews in v. 46 and the reaction of the Gentiles in v. 48. Whereas the Jews rejected the gospel and judged themselves to be unworthy of eternal life (v. 46), the Gentiles received it gladly and embraced the message of eternal life (v. 48). In both cases the decision was a matter of free choice. There is no support for Calvinism in v. 48. Jack Cottrell Acts 13:48 and Calvinism

Even among Calvinists

As many as were ordained to eternal life (ὁσοι ἠσαν τεταγμενοι εἰς ζωην αἰωνιον [hosoi ēsan tetagmenoi eis zōēn aiōnion]). Periphrastic past perfect passive indicative of τασσω [tassō], a military term to place in orderly arrangement. The word “ordain” is not the best translation here. “Appointed,” as Hackett shows, is better. The Jews here had voluntarily rejected the word of God. On the other side were those Gentiles who gladly accepted what the Jews had rejected, not all the Gentiles. Why these Gentiles here ranged themselves on God’s side as opposed to the Jews Luke does not tell us. This verse does not solve the vexed problem of divine sovereignty and human free agency. There is no evidence that Luke had in mind an absolutum decretum of personal salvation.

A.T. Robertson, Word Pictures in the New Testament (Nashville, TN: Broadman Press, 1933), Ac 13:48.

still others

The “had been appointed to eternal life” or the “appointment to eternal life” had occurred before they heard and believed the gospel that was presented by Paul and Barnabas. However, the wording does not require that this appointment to eternal life must be a reference to eternity past. I think what the verse is telling us is that all of those who had been saved prior to their hearing the New Testament gospel subsequently believed when they heard the gospel being presented by Paul and Barnabas. At the moment of their salvation in the past, (they were old covenant believers) they were appointed to eternal life. When they heard about the redemptive work of Jesus the Messiah, they believed and became New Testament believers.


Pinson, J. Matthew; Forlines, F. Leroy. Classical Arminianism. The Theology of Salvation (Kindle Locations 3138-3143). Ingram Distribution. Kindle
 
Back
Top Bottom