Council of Nicea and Constantinople

Sorry, you do not know what you are talking about Lexicons are dictionaries not translations

Current translations are not translated from the Latin but the Greek from thousands of Greek copies which exist.

You clearly have no idea what you are talking about
No originals exist. They didn't exist in the 1300,s. Its 100% fact Catholicism translated into Latin in the 300,s and kept it that way until the 1300,s.
 
Sorry, you do not know what you are talking about Lexicons are dictionaries not translations

Current translations are not translated from the Latin but the Greek from thousands of Greek copies which exist.

You clearly have no idea what you are talking about
Then if you are correct, all the Greek copies were translated from The latin vulgate, then to the Greek lexicons.
 
All know 2Cor 4:4 is speaking of satan.
Actually that is not true

There are in fact those who deny it

The god of this world. There can be no doubt that Satan is here designated by this appellation; though some of the fathers supposed that it means the true God, and Clarke inclines to this opinion

Albert Barnes, Notes on the New Testament: II Corinthians & Galatians (ed. Robert Frew; London: Blackie & Son, 1884–1885), 75.
 
No originals exist. They didn't exist in the 1300,s. Its 100% fact Catholicism translated into Latin in the 300,s and kept it that way until the 1300,s.
You would have to introduce some scholarly support and would have to explain away the many Greek texts found across many eras and locations. Also, Jews kept the Hebrew texts preserved
 
Yes we will as you deny Christ of his pre-incarnate glory
I know 100%, being the firstborn of all creation. God shared glory with his master worker( Prov 8:30)--None other than the one who was by Gods side during creation process was the one God sent to earth.
 
Actually that is not true

There are in fact those who deny it

The god of this world. There can be no doubt that Satan is here designated by this appellation; though some of the fathers supposed that it means the true God, and Clarke inclines to this opinion

Albert Barnes, Notes on the New Testament: II Corinthians & Galatians (ed. Robert Frew; London: Blackie & Son, 1884–1885), 75.
They deny many things its called the darkness.
 
I know 100%, being the firstborn of all creation. God shared glory with his master worker( Prov 8:30)--None other than the one who was by Gods side during creation process was the one God sent to earth.
So you have renounced any belief that the word of John 1:1 was an impersonal thing or plan
 
You would have to introduce some scholarly support and would have to explain away the many Greek texts found across many eras and locations. Also, Jews kept the Hebrew texts preserved
Yes with Gods name in nearly 6800 spots OT alone, removed by Jerome in his Latin Vulgate. By satans will. Gods will = his name in his bible in over 7000 spots. Whose will does your religion support on that matter of Jesus' Fathers name? Jesus was clear in the Lords prayer-its the #1 issue for all involved.
 
Then if you are correct, all the Greek copies were translated from The latin vulgate, then to the Greek lexicons.
Again you conflate lexicons and Greek texts

And All Greek text were not translated from the latin vulgate

There existed many greek copies
 
Yes with Gods name in nearly 6800 spots OT alone, removed by Jerome in his Latin Vulgate. By satans will. Gods will = his name in his bible in over 7000 spots. Whose will does your religion support on that matter of Jesus' Fathers name? Jesus was clear in the Lords prayer-its the #1 issue for all involved.
You got a name for which there is no evidence

YHWH is his name as it appears in the Hebrew scriptures
 
Yes with Gods name in nearly 6800 spots OT alone, removed by Jerome in his Latin Vulgate. By satans will. Gods will = his name in his bible in over 7000 spots. Whose will does your religion support on that matter of Jesus' Fathers name? Jesus was clear in the Lords prayer-its the #1 issue for all involved.
I missed where you shared scholarly references to show that the Greek text was translated from the Latin. Maybe you can provide those references again. Thanks:)
 
You got a name for which there is no evidence

YHWH is his name as it appears in the Hebrew scriptures
That is his Hebrew name-What don't understand about that. Our translations are not written in Hebrew. In Hebrew there is no-Job, Jeremiah, Joshua--they all begin in Y.
 
That is his Hebrew name-What don't understand about that. Our translations are not written in Hebrew. In Hebrew there is no-Job, Jeremiah, Joshua--they all begin in Y.
No what you do not understand is vowels were added to the name, and then it was latinized and converted to english

The name is YHWH not Jehovah
 
Back
Top Bottom