Let’s crucify PSA
The Problem with Penal Substitutionary Atonement
PSA says that Jesus died as punishment for our sins to satisfy the demands of God’s justice. We are sinners. We deserve punishment. Jesus took that punishment for us, even though he didn’t deserve it. God was satisfied, and now we can be reconciled to Him simply by believing in Jesus.
So …
- God created humanity with free will …
- Knew humanity would use that free will to sin …
- Then allowed the torture and execution of his own son because we did what He created us to do …
- So that He didn’t have to punish us for doing what He created us to do …
- And we would then try to stop sinning, or doing what He created us to do.
Now layer on the Trinity.
- God is Jesus, Jesus is God.
- So God allowed Himself to be killed to reconcile us to Himself.
It sounds noble until you think about its sheer pointlessness.
Most PSA adherents believe God is all-powerful. He might have snapped His fingers and said, “Okay, you’re all forgiven and reconciled to Me if you believe in Jesus and do what he said.” Instead, He deemed the torture and execution of his son, or Himself, necessary to help along our belief in Jesus, or Him.
If you don’t believe God is all-powerful, PSA still should not sit well with you. Instead of choosing to forgive and express that forgiveness through Jesus’ ministry and the Holy Spirit, God allows a violent scapegoating execution because
you are such an awful person.
PSA portrays God as an authoritarian monster obsessed with doling out “just” punishments, not a being of love who shows mercy and grace.
PSA makes people feel like worthless sinners whom God can’t stand to look upon, not beloved sinners with whom God interacts and influences.
Photo by
Kelly Sikkema on
Unsplash
Atonement and the Resurrection
If we don’t believe in PSA, then what atonement theory should we believe in?
I could make an argument for one or more atonement theories, but I’ve begun wondering if atonement theories focus on the wrong thing entirely.
Whatever atonement theory you prefer, all of them agree that Jesus cosmically defeated sin and death through his self-sacrifice.
But … if Jesus had not come back from the dead three days after dying on the cross … would Jesus have defeated sin and death?
Tim Mackie presents an interesting historical interpretation of the Crucifixion in
The Bible Project Podcast.
When we take off our Christian hats and put on our historian hats, we can make a compelling argument that Jesus died on the cross as a natural consequence of threatening the political and religious leaders of his day.
Jesus, being a smart guy, knew that Roman-occupied Israel was a powder keg ready to blow. He could have easily foreseen the results of his challenges to authority and continued poking the bear so that his death could serve as a pressure-release valve.
Becoming a pressure-release valve that prevents Israel’s destruction at the hands of the Roman Empire may very well have been equivalent to salvation in Jesus’ mind. He was, after all, an observant first-century Jew who closely identified with the nation of Israel.
Tim Mackie adds that the human, political sacrifice simultaneously serves as a cosmic, spiritual atonement.
Indeed, most Christians would also point to specific Scriptures in which Jesus predicted his death, resurrection, or both. They’d say, “See, Jesus understood his death as a spiritual, cosmic atonement, not just a political repercussion.”
But … if Jesus had not come back from the dead … then Jesus would have been yet another failed, false Messiah in a long line of Jews claiming to be the long-awaited Messiah. All of Jesus’ teaching would have been reduced to the pedagogy of a wise man who was not the Messiah.
Nothing would have changed for Israel, for humanity, if the Resurrection hadn’t happened.
Photo by
Zachary Olson on
Unsplash
What if Atonement Comes from the Resurrection?
So I’ve begun wondering, what if the Cross does nothing and the Resurrection does everything?
What if the Cross was simply the culmination of political and social upheaval? What if Jesus saw himself as a scapegoat who would release the energy building toward violent revolution against Rome?
And what if Jesus also believed — deeply trusted — that God would resurrect him and thereby prove God’s existence, the reality of an after-life, the reality of resurrection, and Jesus’ status as the “Son of Man,” the Messianic figure predicted in the Book of Daniel?
What if Jesus/God defeated sin and death through the resurrection, not the crucifixion? What if Jesus/God removed the obstacles of sin and death through proving their power over sin and death?
What if our atonement does not rest in some magical cosmic event at the moment of Jesus’ death? What if it lay in deeply trusting God to resurrect us and renew heaven and earth?
This Easter, we can crucify PSA and consider a view of atonement centered on the resurrection rather than the cross. Eric Sentell
hope this helps !!!