Dizerner
Well-known member
A spiritually dead person has no spiritual trust
By God's Preceding Grace, they can be enabled.
A spiritually dead person has no spiritual trust
Adam who was “spiritually “dead hid from God in the garden and was able to communicate with God and understand Him. In the day you eat you shall surely die. So adam sinned and was spiritually dead and yet could communicate with God and understand God. “I heard you in the garden, and I was afraid because I was naked; so I hid.” (Genesis 3:10)A spiritually dead person has no spiritual trust
Nope, because Grace gives Spiritual life from the dead Eph 2:5By God's Preceding Grace, they can be enabled.
Adam who was “spiritually “dead hid from God in the garden and was able to communicate with God and understand Him. In the day you eat you shall surely die. So adam sinned and was spiritually dead and yet could communicate with God and understand God. “I heard you in the garden, and I was afraid because I was naked; so I hid.” (Genesis 3:10)
Nope, because Grace gives Spiritual life from the dead Eph 2:5
Wrong I just proved it with lots of scripture that exposed the heretical teaching on dead used by Calvinists
Grace makes live from the dead Eph 2:5This is your assertion, but you are limiting the grace of God, which can do many things.
Because the grace of God can do Y does not mean it cannot also do Z, that's a fallacy.
A spiritually dead person has no spiritual trust, that goes for , anyoneWrong I just proved it with lots of scripture that exposed the heretical teaching on dead used by Calvinists
Before one can do anything spiritual, they need to first be resurrected from the dead, saved from death, and Grace does that
Before one can do anything spiritual, they need to first be resurrected from the dead, saved from death, and Grace does that, see Grace makes alive first Eph 2:5False, that's Calvinism imposed on the text.
Even most Calvinists admit to a so-called "common grace," you are the hyper variety.
Eph 2:5Even when we were dead in sins, hath quickened us together with Christ, (by grace ye are saved) Dead - nekrous - This word carries with it the meaning of “dead, lifeless, and useless.” If a person is in this spiritual state, how could they possibly be able to “accept the Lord” when they are dead? Whenever you go to a funeral, does the guest of honor ever move or do they direct the funeral service? The answer is a resounding no, why? Because they are dead, lifeless! Quickened us together with = “made us alive” - Here we see that for those who are the Elect of God are “made” alive. It is not possible for any human being to make themselves alive, it must be done from an outside source. God loved us when we were dead in sins because we were predestined to be saved from eternity past. The difference between the life of the unbeliever and believer is literally “life and death.” Neither yield ye your members as instruments of unrighteousness unto sin: but yield yourselves unto God, as those that are alive from the dead, and your members as instruments of righteousness unto God. (Romans 6:13) Always keep in mind the pronouns “we” and “us.” Paul tells us that by grace we are saved and there is absolutely nothing a person can add to their salvation or to attain their salvation. The Christian is passive in salvation because all they do is receive it. https://www.scionofzion.com/ephesians2_1-6.htm
Assuming a spiritually dead person knows they are spiritually dead.A spiritually dead person has no spiritual trust
Before one can do anything spiritual, they need to first be resurrected from the dead, saved from death, and Grace does that, see Grace makes alive first Eph 2:5
They dont knowAssuming a spiritually dead person knows they are spiritually dead.
You in the dark about Gods Grace, its Sovereign, it reigns through Jesus Christ Rom 5:21False, the world is convicted of sin by the Holy Spirit. The world is defined here as those who do not believe:
8 "And when He has come, He will convict the world of sin, and of righteousness, and of judgment:
9 "of sin, because they do not believe in Me; (Jn. 16:8-9 NKJ)
You in the dark about Gods Grace, its Sovereign, it reigns through Jesus Christ Rom 5:21
Yeah, you dont know nothing about the Sovereign Grace of God friend, it reigns through Jesus Christ Rom5:21In the dark for clearly quoting Scripture that you flat out deny... absurd.
It is resisting the Holy Spirit to stubbornly stay with false doctrine.
I will not listen to such stubbornness, nor give its opinions any respect.
Yeah, you dont know nothing about the Sovereign Grace of God friend, it reigns through Jesus Christ Rom5:21
21 That as sin hath reigned unto death, even so might grace reign through righteousness unto eternal life by Jesus Christ our Lord.
We will see at the Judgment ! Tulip is the Gospel, and Grace reigns and makes alive !See you at the Judgment Seat, you cannot say I did not warn you of your false doctrine.
Here is where you completely overlooked the words "to become" within the phrase "to them He gave authority to become children of God".
You did that deliberately in order to distort Saint John's sacred words. You have no shame in mangling Saint John's sacred words.
Thus, "as many as received Him" (John 1:12) it follows that "to them He gave authority to become children of God" (John 1:12).
Saint John further enforces "to the ones believing in his name" (John 1:12) "He gave authority to become children of God (John 1:12).
This is a double emphasis that those who actively received Him and believe into His name are them He gave authority to become children of God.
And how does one become children of God? By being "born of God" (John 1:13) which only God has the capability of doing.
Therefore, "received Him" (John 1:12) and "belief into His name" comes before "to become children of God" i.e.: "born of God"
Thus, Calvinism crashes and burns before our very eyes.
Therefore, I will proceed to separate your heretical words from John's sacred words that you highlighted by jettising your heretical distorted comments and keeping Saint John's sacred words as follows:
In summary, only Saint John's holy words remain. You have no shame in mangling John's sacred words. You completely overlooked the phrase "to become" in John 1:12 in order to distort John's sacred message.
RB is declaring that "you" (Nicodemus) is not the subject here. That places Nicodemus in a class by himself, apart from "a man". Basic English Grammar. Now if you want to backtrack from RB's statement then you have all the freedom in the world to do so.