All Claims of The Son's Deity

Right and that is what doctrines are, which are the very same things that are heavily condemned by the Bible. They take a little bit here, take a little bit there, put it all together and thus abuse the very sacred Scriptures they think they are preserving. The Pharisees were heavily rebuked for such things. Apparently, it was such a big problem that even Peter of all people was saying it would get people destroyed. John said that altering his writings in Revelation would make someone lose their salvation.

This thing is is that the Scriptures already are the revelation from God and there is no invitation to add to them or take away from them. There is no invitation to take something Jesus, Paul, and anyone else said in what was recorded and mix it all together and form a conclusion other than the conclusion that was already presented.

As you said, there are no statements about the trinity in the Bible. With as something as important as who God is and the written testimony that Jesus revealed who God is then one would think that would be in the Bible, but of course it's not. Jesus was a strict monotheist and what we would call a Unitarian by today's standards. He plainly taught to worship, pray to, fast for, and serve the Father who he called the only true God. He lead by example and practiced what he preached.

For some reason, Jesus' teachings were offensive to a lot of people. It may not be readily apparent as to why, but when you love the truth it's difficult to assume the rationale of those who hate it. There is a major spiritual component to what God taught Jesus to teach about and it ultimately boils down to a matter a light versus darkness, not only in a figurative sense, but in a literal good versus evil sense. That's why they simply reject the matter of the Father being the only true God. The people are of this world are usually easier to reach than them as they have not been corrupted by their false doctrines.
From the very beginning the majority have always been on the wrong side. I have said for years just look at what the Catholics are doing and then do the opposite and you will probably be right on. The first couple of chapters of Romans paints a picture of men walking by their flesh and I believe that's what we have here. Men walking in their flesh and calling it spiritual. The one thing I don't know is if many of them are without spirit. I said many not all.
 
I'm not sure what you issue is. There are various implications of begotten Son. It can refer to having the Kingship through resurrection or reflecting back on Jesus' birth for his incarnation.
Are you denying the virgin birth where God initiated the birth?
You just seem to prefer to deny Christ.
Jesus was fathered by God in every sense of the word according to the Bible. Jesus isn't an eternal being.
 
Jesus was fathered by God in every sense of the word according to the Bible. Jesus isn't an eternal being.
Maybe you know that a father's qualities are in their sons. The divinity obviously is part of that. But we also know that Jesus refers to his pre-existence.
Great overlooking of so much scripture. You are skilled in overlooking the pre-existence that is repeated in so many ways in scripture. Does the idea of pre-existence have some other meaning to you? Are the verses about his pre-existence disappear from your bible?
 
From the very beginning the majority have always been on the wrong side. I have said for years just look at what the Catholics are doing and then do the opposite and you will probably be right on. The first couple of chapters of Romans paints a picture of men walking by their flesh and I believe that's what we have here. Men walking in their flesh and calling it spiritual. The one thing I don't know is if many of them are without spirit. I said many not all.
I've been saying the same things for years and the difference is likely foundational. The name of this forum was attractive to me because I figured there may be a lot of people like me. Didn't the Bereans search the Scriptures to see if what Paul said was true? That's been a foundational belief for me and searching the Scriptures early on is how I realized the that the trins are full of it. They make a claim, I searched the Bible, and there was nothing about what they said there. They just have a bunch of doctrines that normally state conlusions entirely foreign to the Bible and orthodox Christianity.
 
I've been saying the same things for years and the difference is likely foundational. The name of this forum was attractive to me because I figured there may be a lot of people like me. Didn't the Bereans search the Scriptures to see if what Paul said was true? That's been a foundational belief for me and searching the Scriptures early on is how I realized the that the trins are full of it. They make a claim, I searched the Bible, and there was nothing about what they said there. They just have a bunch of doctrines that nomrally state conlusions entirely foreign to the Bible and orthodox Christianity.
I would be amazed if you do not see everything backwards.
 
Maybe you know that a father's qualities are in their sons. The divinity obviously is part of that. But we also know that Jesus refers to his pre-existence.
Great overlooking of so much scripture. You are skilled in overlooking the pre-existence that is repeated in so many ways in scripture. Does the idea of pre-existence have some other meaning to you? Are the verses about his pre-existence disappear from your bible?
Jesus didn't pre-exist. As usual, I will ask you to show me where Jesus was in the Old Testament saying or doing anything and, as usual, you not only will come up empty handed, but you won't even dignify the fact that there is no evidence for a pre-existent Jesus. You won't even address it or explain why. You will throw up some smokescreens, pretend like you were clever, and continue on. I know you.
 
Jesus didn't pre-exist. As usual, I will ask you to show me where Jesus was in the Old Testament saying or doing anything and, as usual, you not only will come up empty handed, but you won't even dignify the fact that there is no evidence for a pre-existent Jesus.
I guess you do not like hearing what Jesus says. Is that total blindness on your part? Or do you just reject Jesus? You do three things here: deny, deny, deny. You are one step away from JWs.
 
I would be amazed if you do not see everything backwards.
As Peter said, look at Catholics for what not do do, generally speaking, though I like the Catholics better than the Protestants because they are more serious about abstaining from sin. I can respect that even though they have some grievous errors as well.
 
As Peter said, look at Catholics for what not do do, generally speaking, though I like the Catholics better than the Protestants because they are more serious about abstaining from sin. I can respect that even though they have some grievous errors as well.
You would find perfect company with those of error-prone doctrines. At least you will have fun until you die.
 
Back
Top Bottom