All Claims of The Son's Deity

We could say that the unitarians are dehumanizing Jesus.

At a minimum, he obvious doesn't know how to communicate. What he related isn't any different from one another. He does know to relate what he's claiming.

I don't believe he cares for Jesus at all. That is my assessment. It is not like I expect anyone else to have the same assessment though.

I've learned for the decades of battle Unitarians that is very seldom true that you find a Unitarian that actually cares anything at all about Jesus. The words of their lips have no praise for Jesus.

Heb 13:12 Wherefore Jesus also, that he might sanctify the people with his own blood, suffered without the gate.
Heb 13:13 Let us go forth therefore unto him without the camp, bearing his reproach.
Heb 13:14 For here have we no continuing city, but we seek one to come.
Heb 13:15 By him therefore let us offer the sacrifice of praise to God continually, that is, the fruit of our lips giving thanks to his name.

 
The devils misquote as good as you. I never said "The message was God". I said the The message (logos) was God and that message was in writing and that message was with Jesus. Messages do not become living creatures.
You said "The Message (logos) was God".

So when will you tell us more about your God which you call "The Message (logos)". Do you pray to The Message (logos)? How does your Church worship The Message (logos)? Do you sing praises to The Message (logos)? Does everyone at your church prostrate themselves towards The Message (logos)? Tell us about this God of yours called The Message (logos).
 
You said "The Message (logos) was God".

So when will you tell us more about your God which you call "The Message (logos)". Do you pray to The Message (logos)? How does your Church worship The Message (logos)? Do you sing praises to The Message (logos)? Does everyone at your church prostrate themselves towards The Message (logos)? Tell us about this God of yours called The Message (logos).
You're continuing to twist and misquote by taking my words out of context. The devils do the same. You're in good company.

The logos in John 1 is the expression of God and His communication of Himself just as a "word" is an outward expression of a person's thoughts. In this case that communication (His words) are an "it" from God. Jesus is not in the picture.
 
You're continuing to twist and misquote by taking my words out of context. The devils do the same. You're in good company.

The logos in John 1 is the expression of God and His communication of Himself just as a "word" is an outward expression of a person's thoughts. In this case that communication (His words) are an "it" from God. Jesus is not in the picture.
So you wish to backtrack on having said "The Message (logos) was God". Heretics always backtrack when their false statements have been exposed as heresies.

You're now going even further away from what John wrote which was "The Word was God" in John 1:1. You're going deeper and deeper into your cesspool stench of heresies.
 
So you wish to backtrack on having said "The Message (logos) was God". Heretics alway backtrack when their false statements have been exposed as heresies.

You're now gone even further away from what John wrote which was "The Word was God" in John 1:1. You're going deeper and deeper into your cesspool stench of heresies.
Truth can only agree with Truth

Lies are always morphing and adapting in order to prevent being EXPOSED as a LIE

Therefore the Holy Spirit Says: "no lie is of the Truth"
 
So you wish to backtrack on having said "The Message (logos) was God". Heretics always backtrack when their false statements have been exposed as heresies.

You're now going even further away from what John wrote which was "The Word was God" in John 1:1. You're going deeper and deeper into your cesspool stench of heresies.
Not backtracking. You are just taking my words out of context which is deception. Nothing more.
 
Not backtracking. You are just taking my words out of context which is deception. Nothing more.
So you continue to promote your view that "The Message (logos) was God".

So then don't be shy about telling us more about your God which you call "The Message (logos)". Do you pray to The Message (logos)? How does your Church worship The Message (logos)? Do you sing praises to The Message (logos)? Does everyone at your church prostrate themselves towards The Message (logos)? Tell us about this God of yours called The Message (logos).
 
So you continue to promote your view that "The Message (logos) was God".

So then don't be shy about telling us more about your God which you call "The Message (logos)". Do you pray to The Message (logos)? How does your Church worship The Message (logos)? Do you sing praises to The Message (logos)? Does everyone at your church prostrate themselves towards The Message (logos)? Tell us about this God of yours called The Message (logos).
No you continue to promote your view that I only said "The Message (logos) was God". What I said was "The message (logos) was God and that message was in writing and that message was with Jesus. Messages do not become living creatures."

And even that was probably a follow up to something we were talking about that you have also left out of the context. It's just evil what you do. Nothing more.
 
Back
Top Bottom