Your Views on The Trinity

If there is a trinity then why not just come out and say it?

Why do we have to jump all over the Bible cutting and pasting pieces of words that are scattered all over the Bible? Why not just teach it? I know enough about how the Bible is written in the New Testament and in the Gospels to know if there was a trinity it would have been taught. The Gospels would have clearly said...

Verily, verily I say unto you that I am Jesus and I'm also God.

The Epistles would have writings like...

Yay, I Paul do testify that Jesus who is God came down from heaven to be a man for us. And we do know and testify that this same Jesus who you crucified is God. And so let us bow our knee to the one and only true God-Man Jesus Christ.

And yet there's nothing like that anywhere. Not in the Old or New Testament. Not even one complete verse like that.

Such an important subject matter like the Trinity and the Bible is silent on all of it.
Did it ever occur to you that not everyone should know.

If everyone understood what in the word would faith be needed for.

And I want YOU to stop using this word..... Bible
There is no word called bible in the Holy Book. It is a word that is made up by men somewhere along the way.... and has been used to refer to that Holy Book
If you insist on adding words in theological talk then dont complain when others add the word Trinity in the talk on who Jesus said to baptise in....
In the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.

What do you think the possible reason is that Christ Jesus, your and my savior would have instructed that....

Did you ever do a deep search on just that verse?

All three are to be named during baptism. NOT just in Jesus name alone or the Son....

Is Baptism not important ? Would it matter if it was done wrong? What say you?

This is a central point over any other reference in the Holy Book and is worthy to be looked into....

Jesus said that in Matt 28:19 this is the proper form.

FACT.... NO ONE listened to him until

Search Assist

The practice of baptizing in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit became popularized in the second century, although early Christians primarily baptized in the name of Jesus. This shift is often attributed to the influence of the Trinitarian formula found in Matthew 28:19.

So it took them until the 2nd century to actually read Matt and follow Jesus' orders.

Definitely worth investigation as to why Jesus said that.
 
Did it ever occur to you that not everyone should know.

If everyone understood what in the word would faith be needed for.

And I want YOU to stop using this word..... Bible
There is no word called bible in the Holy Book. It is a word that is made up by men somewhere along the way.... and has been used to refer to that Holy Book
If you insist on adding words in theological talk then dont complain when others add the word Trinity in the talk on who Jesus said to baptise in....
In the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.

What do you think the possible reason is that Christ Jesus, your and my savior would have instructed that....

Did you ever do a deep search on just that verse?

All three are to be named during baptism. NOT just in Jesus name alone or the Son....

Is Baptism not important ? Would it matter if it was done wrong? What say you?

This is a central point over any other reference in the Holy Book and is worthy to be looked into....

Jesus said that in Matt 28:19 this is the proper form.

FACT.... NO ONE listened to him until

Search Assist

The practice of baptizing in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit became popularized in the second century, although early Christians primarily baptized in the name of Jesus. This shift is often attributed to the influence of the Trinitarian formula found in Matthew 28:19.

So it took them until the 2nd century to actually read Matt and follow Jesus' orders.

Definitely worth investigation as to why Jesus said that.
No it never occurred to me that God would keep something as important as the Trinity a mystery. Something that is openly admitted by theologians that is not known by many Christians is that the doctrine of the Trinity is not stated in the Scriptures, but is actually “built” by piecing together statements that are said to support it. Since most Christians believe the Trinity is a mystery and not to be understood is a huge reason why doctrinal discussions about it are often avoided or brushed aside and ignored. Worse, the teaching that the Trinity is a “mystery” has been used as a club to beat down doubters and dissenters, and those people are often branded as “heretics” and their role in Christianity minimized.
 
No it never occurred to me that God would keep something as important as the Trinity a mystery. Something that is openly admitted by theologians that is not known by many Christians is that the doctrine of the Trinity is not stated in the Scriptures, but is actually “built” by piecing together statements that are said to support it. Since most Christians believe the Trinity is a mystery and not to be understood is a huge reason why doctrinal discussions about it are often avoided or brushed aside and ignored. Worse, the teaching that the Trinity is a “mystery” has been used as a club to beat down doubters and dissenters, and those people are often branded as “heretics” and their role in Christianity minimized.
Ah @Peterlag,

For myself I never questioned the validity of the Trinity because when I was first going to confirmation classes I remember them talking and handing out papers and they may have issued bible verses to study , but the Trinity was taught in relationship to Jesus being the Son.... I never felt it was was some later invention that the Bible never actually says.

Even when I got interesting in reading the bible I never gave it a thought because there are words other then the Trinity and Bible that simply are not in there. So I started to read the bible... at work... and was told I could not understand what I was reading without a guide but I was slow... and I was allowed... and it still bever occurred to me with all the churches around like the Trinity United Methodist etc because it was always in from of my face.

But someone brought up a non belief and I kept right on in my self-studying (long before computers, or search assists, or even Ai... and did not have a Stongs at work but my mind was alert to things I had heard... things that did not make sense... such as
the boss who was predestined believing... NOT Calvin... who said everyone will be saved.... I asked even Hitler... and he said he believed so. And this one was one with very wandering hands in the work place... (I will explain no further) and I knew his wife well.... and for far too long it was almost a daily thing to fight him off... but he was certain of going to heaven....

So once when I saw it .... it is right on the surface of the text, not hidden at all.

Here are five of the clearest places that leave no room for doubt. (no piecing together required):

1. Matthew 28:19“Go therefore and make disciples… baptizing them in the name [singular] of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.” One name (one God), yet three distinct Persons listed. Remember, I asked you why Jesus would have instructed this with the 3 of them in the important sacrament of Baptism.............

2. 2 Corinthians 13:14“The grace of the Lord Jesus Christ and the love of God and the fellowship of the Holy Spirit be with you all.”.... Paul puts all three on the same level in a single blessing. I think we should change the name of the bible to Paul's book. At least his name is in there.

3. John 1:1 + 1:14“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God… And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us.”→ The Son is with God (distinct) and is God (same being).

4. John 10:30 + 10:33Jesus: “I and the Father are one.” Jews picked up stones: “You, being a man, make yourself God.”→ Jesus claimed full deity; the Jews understood perfectly.

5. John 14–16(Jesus’ own words)

The Father sends the Son (14:24–26)

The Son prays to the Father (17:1–5)

The Father and Son send the Spirit (15:26; 16:7)

The Spirit glorifies the Son (16:14)→ Real personal interaction that only makes sense with three distinct Persons.

The word “Trinity” isn’t in the Bible (just like “omnipotence” or “incarnation” aren’t), but the reality is taught on page after page. The early church didn’t invent it — they simply put one word on what the Scriptures already shout.


And yes, exactly how one God is three Persons is a mystery — but that one God is three Persons is not a mystery; it’s what the Bible plainly says.
 
Hebrews 1:8 is not a teaching on the trinity or that we should believe or confess that Jesus is God. Hebrews is saying your throne oh God is forever. Not Jesus is forever. In Hebrews it's quoted referring to Jesus having the use of that throne.

Hebrews 1:8
But unto the Son he saith, Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever: a sceptre of righteousness is the sceptre of thy kingdom.

Psalms 45:6
Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever: the sceptre of thy kingdom is a right sceptre.

“Your throne is God.” Hebrews 1:8 is an almost exact quotation from the Septuagint version of Psalm 45:6, which itself was a very good translation of the Hebrew text of Psalm 45:6, and Hebrews 1:9 is from the Septuagint of Psalm 45:7. The theme of Hebrews 1 centers around the Father’s rule and elevation of the Son over the rest of creation. God spoke through the prophets, and then through His Son, who He appointed heir of all things and who is now seated at God’s right hand as second in command under God.

The God of the Son—anointed him and set him above his companions, such that the Son now sits on God’s right hand. Hebrews exalts the Son, and in so doing exalts the Father. But in contrast to what Trinitarians say, Hebrews 1:8 (and thus Psalm 45:6) does not call Jesus “God” and does not support the Trinity. To see that fully, one must study Psalm 45. Upon examination, Psalm 45 does not support the Trinity, so when it is quoted in Hebrews 1:8 then that quotation does not support the Trinity either. The Jews read Psalm 45 for centuries and never concluded that the Messiah would be “God in the flesh” or somehow be part of a Triune God.
I see Isaiah 9:6 as talking of the Child, and what Jesus will be called. He is God. There was no man that was pure enough to be a sacrifice for the sin of the world, so God came Himself, but had to have a human body that could die seeing as God cannot die.

My post to you wasn't about the Trinity, but about the Son being called God by the Father God.
 
Back
Top Bottom