praise_yeshua
Well-known member
This should be interesting because no matter which way it is answered the result favors trinitarianism, not unitarianism. Its a lose lose for them.
Absolutely. No matter how you look at it. They devalue the Son.
This should be interesting because no matter which way it is answered the result favors trinitarianism, not unitarianism. Its a lose lose for them.
And Jesus own words contradict that position. He declared one who is greater than Moses is among them and they rejected His claims as blasphemy.Absolutely. No matter how you look at it. They devalue the Son.
And Jesus own words contradict that position. He declared one who is greater than Moses is among them and they rejected His claims as blasphemy.
Never. He declared that he is the "I Am" of the OT and commended Thomas with the phrase "you have believed" when Thomas addressed Jesus as "my God". A unitarian Jesus would not even think of that, let alone do that.As a man, didn’t he act as a unitarian does?
I'm interested in what spoke to you the most from those books.The two books I alluded to are:
1. Heresies: Heresy And Orthodoxy In The History Of The Church. It was written by Harold O.J. Brown (a Protestant). He was writing specifically to and for people like me, whom he hoped to persuade to return to historical orthodox trinitarianism. I highly recommend it to trinitarians and non-trinitarians alike.
2. The Triune God: A Historical Study of the Doctrine of the Trinity. It was written by Edmund J. Fortman (a Catholic) in defense of the Trinity. I also highly recommend it to trinitarians and non-trinitarians alike.
The Bible persuades us. If it's other books that persuade you then you have all the freedom in the world to do so.The man Messiah Jesus acted as a unitarian would act, not as a trinitarian would act. That’s easy. What’s not easy is the reluctance of most trinitarians to acknowledge that the man Messiah Jesus was what he acted, a unitarian.
It is what it is. Trinitarians must be allowed to believe what they are persuaded is true.
What caused you to do a full exit?What it was for me as a trinitarian was a first step away from trinitarianism. A full exit from trinitarianism followed several years later.
I would like to explore this further, this Greek vs Jewish impression you have. Are you talking about Philo who Christianity did not accept?That’s where we disagree. Gentile theologians centuries later struggled to explain what the Jew Jesus said. They interpreted his claims from a non-Jewish perspective, using Greek philosophy.
The Jesus story is an all Jewish affair. When understood from a Jewish perspective, which makes much better sense to me, the result, as we see, is much different than understood from the perspective of Greek philosophy.
The RCC did not exist during the first millennium of Christianity. You are appealing to then non-existent witnesses.There are no trinitarians in the OT or the NT. That’s a major concession made by trinitarian scholarship, especially Catholic scholarship.
Correct but as a man God is prophet, priest and king.
Hebrews makes Christ superior to all men who help those earthly positions of authority. Now He as both God and man fulfills the greater position over his human counterpart's as taught in the entire book of Hebrews. He is superior in nature, ontology, position, rank and essence to both angels and man. Only God is superior to angels in rank/position.
So when it comes "rank". You believe that Moses and Yeshua are equal? Just want to make sure.
You appealed to "I don’t debate." because it "useless".... (my words). This would indicate you're settled like the ones' you claim refuse to change.
This should be interesting because no matter which way it is answered the result favors trinitarianism, not unitarianism. Its a lose lose for them.
No. Moses is a prophet but the Messiah is a prophet, a priest and a king. The Messiah is superior in rank to everyone except his / my God.
Never. He declared that he is the "I Am" of the OT …[/iI]
… and commended Thomas with the phrase "you have believed" when Thomas addressed Jesus as "my God". A unitarian Jesus would not even think of that, let alone do that.
If Jesus is a Godman I would expect someone would have said so.
I'm interested in what spoke to you the most from those books.
I have agreed that Jesus is worshipped. I’ve spent a fair amount of time discussing what worship is and who may be worshipped besides God.
My God is the same as adams, all the prophets, psalmist, Jesus, the Apostles- The Plural God they all attest to in Scripture.I don’t see it that way at all. I still have my trump card - Jesus of Nazareth; unitarian in faith and practice. His God is my God. Your God is the Trinity.
The Bible persuades us. If it's other books that persuade you then you have all the freedom in the world to do so.
What caused you to do a full exit?
I hold open the small possibility that I may be mistaken. Do you?