What is the difference between eternal security, once saved always saved, and perseverance of the saints?

In fact it was more about the 1500s, and John Calvin is the first person I've found that really elaborates the logic of modern Eternal Security so much so, that I would call him the father of OSAS. If you haven't seen it already I'd recommend this documentary:


Calvinism teaches the perseverance of the saints.

I understand this to be different than OSAS.

In fact, this very thread is about the differences.

If I may:
OSAS states that once a person has accepted Jesus as their personal Savior...they can live a life of sin and still be saved because they are somehow sealed into salvation. The NT teaches obedience to God so OSAS cannot be correct.

Perseverance of the saints is a Calvinist teaching that states that if God has chosen a person for salvation...then God will also keep that person safe all their life and make them persevere till the end of their life.
This is also not biblical because the NT teaches that we can fall away from our faith.

So, yes, Calvinism began in the 1500's,,,,you're 100% correct.

But OSAS began in the 1800's and was adapted by some denominations that were NOT reformed/Calvinist.


Should I still watch the documentary?
 
If we have faith in Jesus Christ and are saved then we are trusting in Him alone for salvation.
Please post a verse that states that we only need to trust in Jesus alone.
I have a Strong's expanded exhaustive concordance of the Bible with Vine's and Pisteuo #4100 says - to have faith (in, upon, or with respect to, a person or thing), to entrust (especially one's spiritual well being to Christ). It goes on to say, pisteuo means not just to believe, but also to be persuaded of; and hence, to place confidence in, to trust, and signifies, in this sense of the word, reliance upon.
We've been through this.
Nothing new here.
If you HAVE FAITH in someone...
do you do what THEY SAY TO DO?

The lengths you'll go through not to do some christianly work.




Paul also writes extensively about the Godly, moral, correct way to live.

… we have an obligation — but it is not to the flesh, to live according to it. For if you live according to the flesh, you will die; but if by the Spirit you put to death the misdeeds of the body, you will live. (Romans 8, NIV)

Put to death, therefore, whatever belongs to your earthly nature: sexual immorality, impurity, lust, evil desires and greed, which is idolatry. (Colossians 3:5, NIV)

Or do you not know that wrongdoers will not inherit the kingdom of God? (1 Corinthians 6:9
, NIV)
And the Book of James smacks us aside the head:

Show me your faith without deeds, and I will show you my faith by my deeds. You believe that there is one God. Good! Even the demons believe that — and shudder. (James 2, NIV)
Depending on which passage you’re reading, the New Testament tells us we are saved by faith alone, and we are saved by how we live.

How do we make sense of the apparent contradiction of faith and good works in the New Testament?

Most Christians say that one must not be truly saved if one lives immorally and eschews good works.

  • If you’re saved, you’re transformed by the Holy Spirit.
  • If you’re transformed, you want to live morally and perform good works.
  • So, you live morally and perform good works.
But that logic begs some sticky questions:

source: https://medium.com/koinonia/in-john-3-16-believe-means-more-than-believe-b62d350818bc



Did you know that in Greek DISBELIEVE has the same connotation as DISOBEY?
Anyone could check this out if they have any doubt that we're supposed to do good works...
are REQUIRED to do good works.
Christians spend the rest of their lives following and obeying Christ "after" they have been saved through faith. You confuse faith with works.
Are we back to BEFORE salvation?
Am I not writing in the English language?
Got a couple of others I could try.....
Don't confuse the obedient act of choosing to believe in Christ for salvation with multiple acts of obedience/works which "follow."

So? That does not change the fact that they went out from us but were not of us and if they were of us then they would have (not might have or should have) but WOULD HAVE continued with us.
Well, I'm rather happy that the GNOSTICS went out from among them.
aren't you?
They might have stayed instead and converted some of the disciples into gnostics!
None of them were of us. Never were. Never saved.
Nowhere in that passage does it speak of being saved or not being saved.
You're READING INTO scripture... as usual.

1 John 2:19
19They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would no doubt have continued with us: but they went out, that they might be made manifest that they were not all of us.


As I said John was speaking of ANTICHRISTS....gnostics that had infiltrated into the group of disciples.

John is speaking of people he calls “antichrist’s”, this is not talking about all believers. Essentially, these are false teachers who deny that Jesus has come in the flesh. They were gnostics who believed that all flesh was evil and that the spiritual realm was good, and therefore it didn’t matter how they lived because the flesh will always be sinful and it cannot effect the spirit. This is why they were denying that Jesus came in the flesh. So this is not a good passage to use to teach the eternal security of believers, because its not the topic being discussed. It falls into the category or an unclear passage and shouldn’t be used to interpret the clear passages which teach conditional security.

source: https://ithinkbiblically.com/does-1-john-219-teach-eternal-security/


Check it out for yourself.....this is a historically known fact.
Gnosticism had already crept into the church when John wrote his letters.
He's speaking about gnostics in 1 John 2:19.
CONTEXT - All three parables in Luke 15 were in rebuke to the Pharisees and scribes who complained, saying, “This Man receives sinners and eats with them." (vs. 2) Eternal IN-securists will try to use the parable of the prodigal son to prove that believers can lose their salvation by arguing that the prodigal son was spiritually alive, then spiritually died (lost his salvation) and was spiritually alive again (regained his salvation) from Luke 15:32 based on certain translations which read: ..thy brother was dead, and is alive AGAIN (KJV) ..for your brother was dead and is alive AGAIN (NKJV) ..this brother of yours was dead and is alive AGAIN (NIV)

I believe I already replied to this.

Are you copying and pasting??

Yet being made "alive AGAIN" foreshadows the "born AGAIN" experience that Jesus spoke of in John 3:3. Of course Jesus wasn't talking about being born again spiritually again and again. We are born once physically and born "again" once spiritually. I find it interesting that certain translations of Luke 15:32 simply say your brother was dead, and is alive; he was lost, and is found (ESV); your brother was dead, but now he is alive. He was lost, but now he is found (NCV); this brother of yours was dead and has come to life; he was lost and has been found (NRS); this brother of yours was dead and has begun to live and was lost and has been found (NASB).

1 Corinthians 2:14.

I already explained what is going to be removed. It's place of light bearing and witness,

So, perseverance was good enough for you in Hebrews 3:12-14 but not in Revelation 2:3? :unsure:

Falling from doing the first works. They needed to repent (change their minds) and do the first works (verse 5). Not repent and believe the gospel all over again in order to become saved all over again, as you seem to teach. Other works-salvationists teach that as well. Works of love no longer characterized the church as a whole in Ephesus, yet in verses 2 and 6, we see that the church in Ephesus was not totally displeasing to the Lord. So, no loss of salvation here.

Amen! Now you are catching on. See Jude 1:5.

You continue to ignore the context. Hebrews 3:8-10 do not harden your hearts as in the rebellion, in the day of trial in the wilderness, where your fathers tested Me, tried Me, and saw My works forty years. Therefore, I was angry with that generation, and said, 'They always go astray in their heart, and they have not known My ways.' No loss of salvation here. Only a failure to receive it. God delivered the Israelites out of Egypt but destroyed those who did not believe. (Jude 1:5) After being delivered out of Egypt, I'm sure that many of these Hebrews began with loud confidence and profession of loyalty? But then later? That is still falling away from God. Perseverance is proof of genuine conversion.
Wow. Yes.
You DO add to scripture, don't you?


In Hebrews 4:2-3, we read: For indeed the gospel was preached to US as well as to THEM; but the word which THEY heard did not profit THEM, not being mixed with faith in those who heard it. For we who have BELIEVED do enter that rest, as He has said: "So I swore in My wrath, 'They shall not enter My rest," although the works were finished from the foundation of the world. Notice that verses 2-3 makes a distinction between "us" who have BELIEVED and do enter that rest and "them" who heard the word but did not mix faith with what they heard and will not enter that rest because of UNBELIEF.
Hebrews 4:2-3
2 For indeed we have had good news preached to us, just as they also; but the word they heard did not profit them, because it was not united by faith in those who heard.
3 For we who have believed enter that rest, just as He has said, "AS I SWORE IN MY WRATH, THEY SHALL NOT ENTER MY REST," although His works were finished from the foundation of the world.


What does the above have to do with OSAS??
Some believed, some didn't.
So am I right....
YOU believe ONLY in REST?
And NOTHING is required of you?
Just as I thought.

And, BTW, THE WORKS spoken of...PLEASE TAKE NOTE...
is the work OF JESUS (please not the capital H...His) works were finished before the beginning...
accepted Christian theology.

NOTHING to do with OSAS.

Again,,,you read into scripture what is not there.

Just like in Hebrews 10:26, someone who has received the "knowledge" of the truth and is among genuine believers and is still in the process of considering the truth, but then ultimately decides to draw back to perdition instead of believing to the saving of the soul still drew back. (Hebrews 10:39) The truth was revealed to such people, yet they still drew back. That is where they drew back from. You can't draw back from the truth if you have not yet acquired the truth and had the chance to consider the truth, but that does not mean you have to fully accept the truth before you draw back.
Hebrews 10:24-26
24 and let us consider how to
stimulate one another to love and good deeds,
25 not forsaking our own assembling together, as is the habit of some, but encouraging one another; and all the more as you see the day drawing near.

Christ or Judgment

26 For if we go on sinning willfully after receiving the knowledge of the truth, there no longer remains a sacrifice for sins,

You're really good at twisting scripture....it's incredible.
Read what you wrote and then read Hebrews 10:24-26 again.
WHAT does it have to do with OSAS??
The writer is speaking to BELEIVERS.
He's saying that they should help each other to do good deeds and to show love.
It states, VERY CLEARLY, that if they go on sinning AFTER RECEIVING THE KNOWLEDGE OF TRUTH...there is no longer any sacrifice.
YOU claim it's speaking about some kind of person that is in the process of considering the truth?
But they decide to draw back?
LET US
ONE ANOTHER
WE
Who are these people that are only considering believing??
If I decide to walk across the Brooklyn bridge and I walk right up to the bridge and am on the verge of stepping onto it, but then instead, I turn and walk away from it, does that mean I didn't turn away and depart from the bridge just because I wasn't actually on the bridge? Of course not. It's the same with these Hebrews who draw back to perdition and do not believe to the saving of the soul.
They're ON THE BRIDGE Dan.
Read the verses again.
With a clean slate of a brain.
If we are not abiding, then we demonstrate that we do not have the Spirit. 1 John 4:13 - By this we know that we abide in Him, and He in us, because He has given us of His Spirit. Those branches have no spiritual and vital connection to the vine. https://www.studylight.org/commentaries/eng/rwp/john-15.html
Dan....
The tree is GOD.
WE are the branches.
If a branch is cut off...it means one of US has been cut off.

Let's try Romans 11:17-22 instead:
17 But if some of the branches were broken off, and you, being a wild olive, were grafted in among them and became partaker with them of the rich root of the olive tree,
18 do not be arrogant toward the branches; but if you are arrogant, remember that it is not you who
supports the root, but the root supports you.
19 You will say then, "Branches were broken off so that I might be grafted in."
20 Quite right, they were
broken off for their unbelief, but you stand by your faith. Do not be conceited *, but fear;
21 for if God did not spare the natural branches, He will not spare you, either.
22 Behold then the kindness and severity of God; to those who fell, severity, but to you, God's kindness, if you continue in His kindness; otherwise you also will be cut off
.


As you can see,,,,GOD is the trunk...it is God that supports the braches...US.
Branches are broken off for UNBELIEF....to believe is to obey John 3:36
to disbelieve is to NOT obey....you could look this up in your favorite Greek help site.
If we do not BELEIVE/OBEY God we also will be broken off. John 3:36 HE WHO DOES NOT OBEY GOD WILL HAVE THE WRATH OF GOD ON HIM.
See...the branches WERE ATTACHED TO THE TREE....they were saved....
and THEY HAVE BEEN BROKEN OFF.....they are no longer saved ....

The people in John 3:36 are BELIEVERS....they have ETERNAL LIFE...
IF they DO NOT OBEY,,,the wrath of God abides on them.

No more eternal life.

We have eternal life IF we stay attached to the trunk of the tree...
from where our life comes.
Romans 11:17-18
17 But if some of the branches were broken off, and you, being a wild olive, were grafted in among them and
became partaker with them of the rich root of the olive tree,
18 do not be arrogant toward the branches; but if you are arrogant, remember that it is not you who
supports the root, but the root supports you.



page 1 of 2

 
@mailmandan

page 2 of 2


Never saved to begin with which explains their hardened hearts. It took them in the opposite direction of God. Considered the truth for a time, then hardened heart and departing from God became their final answer.

You are showing me your eisegesis.

Yes, unbelief. (John 3:18) There is no middle ground.

Their belief was not consummated belief resulting in salvation. Departing from God demonstrates that the stage in the progress of their belief fell short of being firmly rooted and established resulting in salvation. Those who draw back to perdition do not believe to the saving of the soul.

You are not reading these verses in Hebrews in context.

You are about 7 hours ahead of my time here.

I accept what it states after reading scripture in context and properly harmonizing scripture with scripture before reaching my conclusion on doctrine.

Roman Catholics also make that same argument yet teach false doctrines such as the perpetual virginity of Mary, infant baptism, baptismal regeneration, indulgences, purgatory, works salvation etc.. They will even quote the church fathers to back up their false doctrine. We should not assume that those who wrote about church doctrine during the early centuries were consistent with apostolic teaching. Yes, they were closer in time to the apostles than we are but that proves nothing. There were groups that separated from the Catholic Church before the Reformation. These include the Waldensians (who were bitterly persecuted by Roman Catholics) and the Hussites. In 1181 the archbishop of Lyons excommunicated the Waldensians. Three years later, the pope declared them to be heretics. In 1215 the Fourth Lateran Council declared an anathema on Waldensian doctrine. That explains a lot! Roman Catholics will often argue that before the reformation no one taught faith alone.

To the contrary, we find:

Clement of Rome: "We also, being called through God's will in Christ Jesus, are not justified through ourselves, neither through our own wisdom or understanding, or piety, or works which we have done in holiness or heart, but through faith" (Epistle to Corinthians).

Polycarp: "I know that through grace you are saved, not of works, but by the will of God, through Jesus Christ (Epistle of Philippians).

Justin Martyr: "No longer by the blood of goats and of sheep, or by the ashes of a heifer...are sins purged, but by faith, through the blood of Christ and his death, who died on this very account (Dialogue with Trypho). "God gave his own Son the ransom for us...for what, save his righteousness, could cover our sins. In whom was it possible that we, transgressors and ungodly as we were, could be justified, save in the Son of God alone? ...O unexpected benefit, that the transgression of many should be hidden in one righteous Person and that the righteousness of One should justify many transgressors" (Letter to Diognetus).

Athanasius: "Not by these (i.e. human efforts) but by faith, a man is justified as was Abraham."

Ambrose: "Without the works of the law, to an ungodly man, that is to say, a Gentile, believing in Christ, his "faith is imputed for righteousness" as also it was to Abraham."

Origen: "Through faith, without the works of the law, the dying thief was justified, because...the Lord inquired not what he had previously wrought, nor yet waited for his performance of some work after he should have believe; but...he took him unto himself for a companion, justified through his confession alone."

Jerome
: "When an ungodly man is converted, God justified him through faith alone, not on account of good works which he possessed not."

Chrysostom: "What then did God do? He made (says Paul) a righteous Person (Christ) to be a sinner, in order that he might make sinners righteous... it is the righteousness of God, when we are justified, not by works...but by grace, where all sin is made to vanish away."

Chrysostom: "Again, they said that he who adhered to faith alone was cursed, but he shows that he who adhered to faith alone, is blessed."

Augustine: "Grace is given to you, not wages paid to you...it is called grace because it is given gratuitously. By no precedent merits did you buy what you have received. The sinner therefore received this grace first, that his sins should be forgiven him...good works follow after a justified person; they do not go before in order that he may be justified...good works, following after justification, show what a man has received."

Augustine:
"Now, having duly considered and weighed all these circumstances and testimonies, we conclude that a man is not justified by the precepts of a holy life, but by faith in Jesus Christ,--in a word, not by the law of works, but by the law of faith; not by the letter, but by the spirit; not by the merits of deeds, but by free grace."

Anselm
: "Do you believe that you cannot be saved but by the death of Christ? Go, then, and ...put all your confidence in this death alone. If God shall say to you, "You are a sinner", say to him, "I place the death of our Lord Jesus Christ between me and my sin."

Bernard of Clairvaux
: "Shall not all our righteousness turn out to be mere unrighteousness and deficiency? What, then, shall it be concerning our sins, when not even our righteousness can answer for itself? Wherefore...let us flee, with all humility to Mercy which alone can save our souls...whoever hungers and thirsts after righteousness, let him believe in thee, who "justified the ungodly"; and thus, being justified by faith alone, he shall have peace with God."

We know that the narrow way leads to life, (John 3:18) and few find it (Matthew 7:13-14). That is true even within organizations and institutions that claim to be Christian and even during the first century we know that the apostles battled people who preached false gospels (2 Corinthians 11:4; Galatians 1:6-9). Here is why I believe in eternal security of the believer and my belief is not negotiable.

Most assuredly, I say to you, he who hears My word and believes in Him who sent Me has everlasting life, and shall not come into judgment, but has passed from death into life. (John 5:24)

The Lord does not forsake His saints/they are preserved forever. (Psalm 37:28)

Jesus shall lose none of all those He has been given. (John 6:39)

Jesus' sheep hear His voice, He knows them, they follow Him, and they shall never perish or be snatched from His hand. (John 10:27-28)

Those He predestined, called and whom He justified these He also glorified. (Romans 8:30)

Who also has sealed us and given us the Spirit in our hearts as a guarantee. (2 Corinthians 1:22)

Now He who has prepared us for this very thing is God, who also has given us the Spirit as a guarantee. (2 Corinthians 5:5)

We believe the gospel, are sealed with the Holy Spirit/guarantee of our inheritance until the purchased possession. (Ephesians 1:13-14)

We are sealed unto/for the day of redemption. (Ephesians 4:30)

He who has begun a good work in us will complete it until the day of Jesus Christ. (Philippians 1:6)

He is able also to save forever those who draw near to God through Him, since He always lives to make intercession for them. (Hebrews 7:25)

We have been sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all. (Hebrews 10:10)

For by one offering he has perfected forever those who are sanctified. (Hebrews 10:14)

Those who are born of God are called, sanctified by God the Father, and preserved in Jesus Christ. (Jude 1:1)

Salvation is not probation.
Eternal life is not temporary life.
Jesus is the door. He is not a revolving door.

*I have discovered that ALL false religions and cults that promote salvation by works strongly oppose OSAS/eternal security/preservation of the saints which has always been a major red flag for me. 🚩
Carpet bombing....sure, that'll work.

BUT

of course since you cannot defend your OSAS position...
you're back to speaking about GETTING SAVED...which is by GRACE AND NOT BY WORKS.

HOW many times does this have to be repeated?
Perhaps this is the problem...
you don't know the difference.

The early fathers you quoted are speaking about GRACE TO BE SAVED.

You want to hear what they said about doing good works?
Polycarp

In modern times, we wrestle with James 2 so much that we dare not simply repeat what James said, "So we see then that we are justified by works and not faith only." Most evangelical churches would silence us for saying such a thing, but it is a Bible quote!
That is a problem. A big one!
THE SOLUTION
Polycarp did not have that problem. He knew that we "have been" saved (past tense) by faith apart from works, but that if we want to be raised up with Jesus on the last day (future tense), then we better have used the power of our salvation to produce good works through our life. This lines up with what Paul says in Ephesians 2:8-10 and explains why he could write both that passage and Ephesians 5:5.
source: https://www.christian-history.org/Early_Church_History_Newsletter-faith-works-and-the-fathers.html
St. Clement of Rome (? - 102 A.D.)

First Letter to the Corinthians 33:1-7
What, then shall we do brothers? Shall we slacken from doing good and abandon charity? May the Lord never allow this to happen to us, but let us be diligent to accomplish every good work with earnestness and zeal.

The good laborer receives the bread of his labor with confidence; the lazy and careless one does not look his employer in the face. We must, therefore, be zealous in doing good; for all things are from Him (God).
*********
Ignatius of Antioch (? - 102? A.D.)

Letter to Polycarp, 6
Toil and train together, run and suffer together, rest and rise at the same time, as God�s stewards, assistants and servants.

******
Didache 12:3-5
But, if he wishes to settle among you and is a craftsman, let him work and eat. But if he has no trade, provide according to your conscience, so that no Christian shall live among you idle. But if he does not agree to do this, he is trading on the name of Christ; beware of such men.
*****

Epistle of Barnabas (100-120 A.D)

Epistle of Barnabas LIX, 10
Remember the day of Judgment day and night, and seek each day the company of the saints, either laboring by speech, and going out to exhort, and striving to save souls by the word or working with you hands for the ransom for your sins.
*****

Clement of Alexandria (c.125 A.D.)

(The Pure soul -- or truly rich man) is ever laboring at some good work and divine work;

*****

Shepherd of Hemas (ca. 150 A.D.)
Second Mandate, 4
Do good, and from the fruit of your labors, God�s gift, give to all those in need, without distinction, not debating to whom you will and to whom you will not give. Since it is God�s will that we give to all from His bounties, give to all.
*****
Saint Basil the Great (329-379 A.D.)

It is, therefore, immediately obvious that we must toil with diligence and not think that our goal of piety offers an escape from work or a pretext for idleness, but occasion for struggle, for ever greater endeavor, and for patience in tribulation, so that we may be able to say: �In labor and painfulness, in much watching, in hunger and thirst.� Not only is such exertion beneficial for bringing the body into subjection, but also for showing charity to our neighbor in order that through us God may grant sufficiency to the weak among our brethren, according to the example given by the Apostle in the Acts when he says: �I have shown you all things, how that so laboring you ought to support the weak,� and again: �that you may have something to give to him that suffereth need.� Thus we may be accounted worthy to hear the words: �Come ye blessed of my Father, possess you the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world. For I was hungry and you gave me to eat; I was thirsty and you gave me to drink...

*****

Hippolytus Refutation of All Heresies book 5 ch 2 (170-236 ad)
And again, it is said, the Saviour has declared, "Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven, but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven." And it is necessary that they who perform this (will), not hear it merely, should enter into the kingdom of heaven.


There's much more.....
I recommend to everyone to know what those that THE APOSTLES taught believed, and those who followed.

I'll guarantee you this:
ALL the ECFs believed that we are to do good works and did NOT believe in faith alone.

(except to receive initial salvation, which is what YOU posted above because, apparently,
you can't grasp the difference between justification and sanctification).
 
In fact it was more about the 1500s, and John Calvin is the first person I've found that really elaborates the logic of modern Eternal Security so much so, that I would call him the father of OSAS. If you haven't seen it already I'd recommend this documentary:


I watched it...
Very good !!
 
@mailmandan


Another member posted this video.

It's wonderful AND BIBLICAL....

I would suggest that you watch it and anyone else that believes in the unbiblical concept of OSAS.

It is nowhere to be found in scripture.


Also, did you ever post any scripture that supports your idea that once you're saved you can never
lose this salvation?

I don't think so.
If I missed it, please repost.

If not,,,please do this
because
you will not find any verses that support OSAS.


 
So, I'm just being stubborn and should ignore those verses I cited and agree with the Roman Catholic church on OSAS? Not hardly. I have been debating this subject for many years and for the sake of arguments if it turns out that I'm wrong then so be it. The object of my faith in salvation is Jesus Christ and not whether or not I'm right or wrong about OSAS. I stand on the cross of Christ. ✝️

Proverbs 24:16 - For a righeous man may fall seven times and rise again, but the wicked shall fall by calamity.

It takes humility to be justified and not self righteousness. (Luke 18:9-14)

NOSAS can too easily get tied in with works salvation.
You're not standing on the cross of Christ....
You're leading some down the path of condemnation with an unbiblical belief.
You're hatred of the CC is coloring this belief system which is rejected by most of Christianity
and was NEVER accepted by the early church...EVER...until the 1800's.

Are you going to post some verses that support your incorrect theory that salvation cannot be lost
when JESUS Himself stated that it can but which verses you choose to ignore?

You choose to IGNORE JESUS...
Yet you say that you stand on the cross of Christ.

Funny stuff Dan.

Let me post this again:
James 3:1
1 Let not many of you become teachers, my brethren, knowing
that as such we will incur a stricter judgment.
 
Noticed the Perfect tenses for those who are saved @mailmandan?


The perfect tense in Greek denotes a completed action with ongoing results. Below are key New Testament verses where salvation is expressed in the perfect tense, affirming its permanence-hence OSAS is a fact.

1. John 5:24
ὁ τὸν λόγον μου ἀκούων καὶ πιστεύων τῷ πέμψαντί με ἔχει ζωὴν αἰώνιον καὶ εἰς κρίσιν οὐκ ἔρχεται, ἀλλὰ μεταβέβηκεν ἐκ τοῦ θανάτου εἰς τὴν ζωήν.
(ho ton logon mou akouōn kai pisteuōn tō pempsanti me echei zōēn aiōnion kai eis krisin ouk erchetai, alla metabebēken ek tou thanatou eis tēn zōēn.)

μεταβέβηκεν (metabebēken, "has passed") – perfect active indicative of μεταβαίνω (metabainō, "to pass over, transfer")
The perfect tense indicates that the believer has permanently crossed over from death to life, a completed action with ongoing effect.

2. John 10:27-28
τὰ πρόβατά μου τὴν φωνὴν μου ἀκούουσιν, κἀγὼ γινώσκω αὐτά, καὶ ἀκολουθοῦσίν μοι· καγὼ δίδωμι αὐτοῖς ζωὴν αἰώνιον, καὶ οὐ μὴ ἀπόλωνται εἰς τὸν αἰῶνα, καὶ οὐχ ἁρπάσει τις αὐτὰ ἐκ τῆς χειρός μου.
(ta probata mou tēn phōnēn mou akouousin, kagō ginōskō auta, kai akolouthousin moi; kagō didōmi autois zōēn aiōnion, kai ou mē apolōntai eis ton aiōna, kai ouch harpasei tis auta ek tēs cheiros mou.)

γινώσκω (ginōskō, "I know") – present but implies an established relationship.
δέδωκα (dedōka, "I have given") – perfect active indicative of δίδωμι (didōmi, "to give")
The perfect tense signifies that eternal life has already been given permanently, and the ongoing reality is secured by Christ.

3. Ephesians 2:8
τῇ γὰρ χάριτί ἐστε σεσῳσμένοι διὰ πίστεως· καὶ τοῦτο οὐκ ἐξ ὑμῶν, θεοῦ τὸ δῶρον·
(tē gar chariti este sesōsmenoi dia pisteōs; kai touto ouk ex humōn, Theou to dōron.)

σεσῳσμένοι (sesōsmenoi, "having been saved") – perfect passive participle of σῴζω (sōzō, "to save")
The perfect passive tense means salvation was completed in the past with continuing results—salvation is an accomplished state, not a process.

4. Hebrews 10:14
μιᾷ γὰρ προσφορᾷ τετελείωκεν εἰς τὸ διηνεκὲς τοὺς ἁγιαζομένους.
(mia gar prosphora teteleiōken eis to diēnekes tous hagiazomenous.)

τετελείωκεν (teteleiōken, "has perfected") – perfect active indicative of τελειόω (teleioō, "to make complete, perfect")
The perfect tense emphasizes the permanent and unchangeable state of the believer’s perfection before God.

5. 1 John 5:13
Ταῦτα ἔγραψα ὑμῖν ἵνα εἰδῆτε ὅτι ζωὴν ἔχετε αἰώνιον, τοῖς πιστεύουσιν εἰς τὸ ὄνομα τοῦ υἱοῦ τοῦ θεοῦ.
(Tauta egrapsa humin hina eidēte hoti zōēn echete aiōnion, tois pisteuousin eis to onoma tou huiou tou Theou.)

εἰδῆτε (eidēte, "that you may know") – perfect active subjunctive of οἶδα (oida, "to know with certainty")
The perfect tense denotes full and settled knowledge—eternal life is not uncertain but something believers can and should know as a present reality.

Summary of Perfect Tense Verbs in These Verses
μεταβέβηκεν (John 5:24) – permanently passed from death to life.
δέδωκα (John 10:27-28) – eternal life has already been given permanently.
σεσῳσμένοι (Ephesians 2:8) – salvation is a completed action with lasting effects.
τετελείωκεν (Hebrews 10:14) – believers are already perfected permanently.

εἰδῆτε (1 John 5:13) – full assurance of eternal life.
These verses collectively emphasize the irrevocable nature of salvation in Christ, as expressed through the perfect tense in Greek.

--and there's more but this should suffice.

Johann.
Speaking of tenses Johann...

If you notice every single verse about BELIEVING is in the present tense.

Now, your posts are very long and I'm spending a lot of my time here with the other member....so I'm not sure what you're saying above.

BUT

If BELIEVE is always in the present tense...
it must surely mean that we must be BELIEVING at the time of our death.

Scripture NEVER states IF YOU HAVE BELIEVED AT SOME POINT...which is what OSAS teaches....
incorrectly.

Scripture always states BELIEVE --- when considering salvation and How to be saved.
John 3:16
FOR WHOSOEVER BELIEVES.....
believes...
present tense.

Acts 16:31
Romans 10:9
Mark 16:16

I'm sure there are many more.
 
Don't know what you mean...
But you could watch this too



I have-too many perfect tenses in Scripture that our salvation in Christ is permanent.

Eph_1:13 In whom ye also trusted, after that ye heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation: in whom also after that ye believed, ye were sealed with that holy Spirit of promise,
Eph_4:30 And grieve not the holy Spirit of God, whereby ye are sealed unto the day of redemption.

--unless you believe we can become "unsealed" @GodsGrace.


But we are on the same page re good works.

J.
 
I have-too many perfect tenses in Scripture that our salvation in Christ is permanent.

Eph_1:13 In whom ye also trusted, after that ye heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation: in whom also after that ye believed, ye were sealed with that holy Spirit of promise,
Eph_4:30 And grieve not the holy Spirit of God, whereby ye are sealed unto the day of redemption.

--unless you believe we can become "unsealed" @GodsGrace.


But we are on the same page re good works.

J.
I'm happy that we're on the same page with good works.
Because those that believe in OSAS USUALLY don't care about good works.
In fact, we have some persons that claim that clinging to good works IS A SIN
because we take glory away from God.

And yes, we can become unsealed.
I offer 2 reasons for your consideration and please look this up since it
seems you don't know:

1. Ephesians 1:13 WE WERE SEALED WITH THE HOLY SPIRIT:
In the early church it was understood that the Holy Spirit sealed us at baptism.
We were sealed in the sense that we now belonged to God instead of satan.
Our OWNERSHIP was changed.

One or two verses will not change the fact that Jesus Himself stated that we could believe for a while
and then fall away. This is spoken of in my discussion with the other member.

We become the property of God FOR AS LONG as we REMAIN IN CHRIST.
See John 15:1-6


2. Kings sent out decrees in an envelope and letter with their SEAL.
This made the content of that letter official and was meant, most times, for the members of the Kingdom.
This content could be rescinded by the King at any time that he wished.


Also, I really suggest going through the verses PLAINLY and understanding them in a SIMPLE way so as not
to misconstrue what they mean.
 
Speaking of tenses Johann...

If you notice every single verse about BELIEVING is in the present tense.

Now, your posts are very long and I'm spending a lot of my time here with the other member....so I'm not sure what you're saying above.

BUT

If BELIEVE is always in the present tense...
it must surely mean that we must be BELIEVING at the time of our death.
Correct-the "believing ones"
Scripture NEVER states IF YOU HAVE BELIEVED AT SOME POINT...which is what OSAS teaches....
incorrectly.
I believe you are incorrect here. This would be the Aorist. I don't adhere to Calvinism but go just with the Scriptures and syntax and morphology. Hence i did not learn OSAS from sources but in what stands written.

Examples of Aorist vs. Present Tense for πιστεύω
Aorist (Completed Action)

Acts 16:31 – Πίστευσον (aorist imperative)- "Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and you shall be saved..."

The aorist imperative commands an immediate and decisive act of faith.


Romans 10:9 – ἐάν ὁμολογήσῃς... καὶ πιστεύσῃς (aorist subjunctive) "If you confess... and believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead, you will be saved."

The aorist subjunctive suggests a specific act of belief, not necessarily ongoing.
Present (Ongoing Action)

John 3:16 – ὁ πιστεύων (present participle)-"Whoever is believing in Him shall not perish but have eternal life."
The present participle suggests continuous, ongoing faith.
-
John 5:24 – ὁ ἀκούων... καὶ πιστεύων (present participle): "He who hears My word and believes in Him who sent Me has eternal life."
Again, the present participle indicates ongoing belief.

So I believe you are incorrect here--see this link.



Scripture always states BELIEVE --- when considering salvation and How to be saved.
John 3:16
FOR WHOSOEVER BELIEVES.....
believes...
present tense.
The present tense is not always continuous-

Some Uses of the Present Tense Obscure the Linear Idea


Are there occassions when there is no durative idea even though the present tense is used? A. T. Robertson wrote,


It is not wise therefore to define the pres. ind. as denoting 'action in progress' like the imperf. as Burton does, for he has to take it back on p. 9 in the discussion of the 'Aoristic Present,' which he calls a 'distinct departure from the prevailing use of the present tense to denote action in progress.' In sooth, it is no 'departure' at all. The idiom is as old as the tense itself and is due to the failure in the development of separate tenses for punctiliar and linear action in the ind. of present time. (p. 864)


In other words, Robertson is saying the kind of action may be punctiliar even though the present is used. Fifteen pages later, he alludes to this observation saying,


It has already been seen that the durative sense does not monopolize the 'present' tense, though it more frequently denotes linear action. The verb and the context must decide. (p. 879)


But this does not mean Robertson considered the present tense to be equally well suited to a linear idea and a punctiliar idea. Rather, certain verbs in certain contexts may call for a punctiliar understanding.

Again-here is a link that will be helpful @GodsGrace. Sounds paradoxical but not really. I don't expect you to study the way I do sister.

God bless.




J.
 
And yes, we can become unsealed.
I offer 2 reasons for your consideration and please look this up since it
seems you don't know:
Nope, an impossibility-not with the double and triple negatives and the perfect tenses.
2. Kings sent out decrees in an envelope and letter with their SEAL.
This made the content of that letter official and was meant, most times, for the members of the Kingdom.
This content could be rescinded by the King at any time that he wished.
This would make the Scripture a lie @GodsGrace.

2Co_1:22 Who hath also sealed us, and given the earnest of the Spirit in our hearts.

Eph_1:13 In whom ye also trusted, after that ye heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation: in whom also after that ye believed, ye were sealed with that holy Spirit of promise,

Eph_4:30 And grieve not the holy Spirit of God, whereby ye are sealed unto the day of redemption.

Also, I really suggest going through the verses PLAINLY and understanding them in a SIMPLE way so as not
to misconstrue what they mean.
As I’ve already explained, this is the approach I take in my studies, and I don’t expect you to follow the same method.

Shalom.

J.
 
Correct-the "believing ones"

I believe you are incorrect here. This would be the Aorist. I don't adhere to Calvinism but go just with the Scriptures and syntax and morphology. Hence i did not learn OSAS from sources but in what stands written.

Examples of Aorist vs. Present Tense for πιστεύω
Aorist (Completed Action)

Acts 16:31 – Πίστευσον (aorist imperative)- "Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and you shall be saved..."

The aorist imperative commands an immediate and decisive act of faith.


Romans 10:9 – ἐάν ὁμολογήσῃς... καὶ πιστεύσῃς (aorist subjunctive) "If you confess... and believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead, you will be saved."

The aorist subjunctive suggests a specific act of belief, not necessarily ongoing.
Present (Ongoing Action)

John 3:16 – ὁ πιστεύων (present participle)-"Whoever is believing in Him shall not perish but have eternal life."
The present participle suggests continuous, ongoing faith.
-
John 5:24 – ὁ ἀκούων... καὶ πιστεύων (present participle): "He who hears My word and believes in Him who sent Me has eternal life."
Again, the present participle indicates ongoing belief.

So I believe you are incorrect here--see this link.

Came by to close down but will reply....
Why am I incorrect?
I stated that a person has TO BELIEVE at the time of his death.
Believe and be believing mean exactly the same.

You know, YOU are the only person that knows what the aorist tense is.
And I've been on these forums many years now.
Most believe it's a time frame...but it's really an action.

The present tense is not always continuous-

Some Uses of the Present Tense Obscure the Linear Idea
Agreed...but the CONTINUOUS just serves to prove that OSAS is not correct.
The BELIEVING must be CONTINUOUS.
Are there occassions when there is no durative idea even though the present tense is used? A. T. Robertson wrote,


It is not wise therefore to define the pres. ind. as denoting 'action in progress' like the imperf. as Burton does, for he has to take it back on p. 9 in the discussion of the 'Aoristic Present,' which he calls a 'distinct departure from the prevailing use of the present tense to denote action in progress.' In sooth, it is no 'departure' at all. The idiom is as old as the tense itself and is due to the failure in the development of separate tenses for punctiliar and linear action in the ind. of present time. (p. 864)
Well Johann,,,believing is an action in progress....right?

In other words, Robertson is saying the kind of action may be punctiliar even though the present is used. Fifteen pages later, he alludes to this observation saying,


It has already been seen that the durative sense does not monopolize the 'present' tense, though it more frequently denotes linear action. The verb and the context must decide. (p. 879)
I'm sorry...I don't understand the problem here...
But this does not mean Robertson considered the present tense to be equally well suited to a linear idea and a punctiliar idea. Rather, certain verbs in certain contexts may call for a punctiliar understanding.

Again-here is a link that will be helpful @GodsGrace. Sounds paradoxical but not really. I don't expect you to study the way I do sister.

God bless.




J.
Right. I don't think I can do anymore studying.
If we want to believe, for instance, that the sealing of the Holy Spirit is permanent -which some do believe this -
we would have to admit that it comes into conflict with several saying and teachings of Jesus.
What do you think of Luke 8:13?
What about the Prodigal Son which I brought up with the other member?
Doesn't the word AGAIN in Luke 15:24 mean that the son was....saved.....lost.....saved again?
And what about the 10 Virgins? They had enough oil. They ran out of oil. They were not READY
when the time came. It could be the end of the world...or the end of OUR world...when we die.

Must go, late here.
'night.
 
Nope, an impossibility-not with the double and triple negatives and the perfect tenses.

This would make the Scripture a lie @GodsGrace.

2Co_1:22 Who hath also sealed us, and given the earnest of the Spirit in our hearts.

Eph_1:13 In whom ye also trusted, after that ye heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation: in whom also after that ye believed, ye were sealed with that holy Spirit of promise,

Eph_4:30 And grieve not the holy Spirit of God, whereby ye are sealed unto the day of redemption.


As I’ve already explained, this is the approach I take in my studies, and I don’t expect you to follow the same method.

Shalom.

J.
What about all the verses that support the belief that salvation can be lost?
Are we to ignore those?
What about the fact that the church never believed in OSAS until recently?
Is that of no value? Were all the prior theologians wrong?

The bible also states that the Holy Spirit is a down payment.
But we must finish paying the price for a house, for instance, and not only give the down payment.
We receive the reward when the payments are complete.

Re Ephesians 4:30 What IF we do grieve the Holy Spirit? Surely this is not referring to sin because John has made provision for sin in his letter.. 1 John chapters 1 and 2, and we are assured of the forgiveness of our sin in many verses...so surely the grieving of the Holy Spirit means something different.

OK. Must go.
 
Came by to close down but will reply....
Why am I incorrect?
I stated that a person has TO BELIEVE at the time of his death.
Believe and be believing mean exactly the same.

You know, YOU are the only person that knows what the aorist tense is.
And I've been on these forums many years now.
Most believe it's a time frame...but it's really an action.


Agreed...but the CONTINUOUS just serves to prove that OSAS is not correct.
The BELIEVING must be CONTINUOUS.

Well Johann,,,believing is an action in progress....right?


I'm sorry...I don't understand the problem here...

Right. I don't think I can do anymore studying.
If we want to believe, for instance, that the sealing of the Holy Spirit is permanent -which some do believe this -
we would have to admit that it comes into conflict with several saying and teachings of Jesus.
What do you think of Luke 8:13?
What about the Prodigal Son which I brought up with the other member?
Doesn't the word AGAIN in Luke 15:24 mean that the son was....saved.....lost.....saved again?
And what about the 10 Virgins? They had enough oil. They ran out of oil. They were not READY
when the time came. It could be the end of the world...or the end of OUR world...when we die.

Must go, late here.
'night.
12.28 AM here, see you tomorrow, God willing.

J.
 
Yes Dan
There are multiple acts of obedience which we must follow.
Everything is "must or else" with you because you promote salvation by works. Is obedience forced and legalistic for you? Faith works through love (Galatians 5:6) and not legalism.
Your Strong's is not necessary.
All that is necessary is the New Testament and the words of Jesus.
The New Testament was written in Greek, so Strong's may help to better understand the meaning of words.
I'm not going to reply to all the rest because it's just you liking the sound of your voice and repeating the
same stuff over and over with no biblical support.
I continuously quote scripture and properly harmonize scripture with scripture before reaching my conclusion on doctrine yet you say I have no Biblical support.
So let's do this:

Post some verses that you think state that you can never lose your salvation.
I already did in post #222.
Thanks.

Easy right. Just claim that they were never saved...
How does one argue with that?
You always find a way to argue. I'm beginning to think that you enjoy arguing and even find it entertaining.
BECAUSE JESUS PLAINLY STATED THIS but you refuse the scriptures.
I don't refuse the scriptures. I only refuse your eisegesis.
Let's see what JESUS SAID.

Luke 8:13
13 "Those on the rocky soil are those who, when they hear, receive the word with joy; and these have no firm root; they
believe for a while, and in time of temptation fall away.

It's a parable that Jesus told.
Some BELEIVE FOR A WHILE.......
AND THEN FALL AWAY.
Now, if I remember my soteriology correctly, it's necessary to believe in order to be saved.
JESUS said THEY BELIEVED so they were BORN AGAIN.
THEN
THEY FELL AWAY.
The demons also believe in James 2:19 (same Greek word --pisteuo) and they are not saved. Saving belief trusts in Jesus Christ alone for salvation and continues and is not some shallow, temporary belief that has no root, produces no fruit and falls away.

Be sure to read post #7 from the link below:


Do you have an argument against what JESUS taught?
No. Just against what you taught.
Luke 15:24
24 for this son of mine was
dead and has come to life again; he was lost and has been found.' And they began to celebrate.

JESUS taught that a person could come to life AGAIN.
What does this mean to you?
To anyone that understands it means that:
A person was saved
became lost
and was saved AGAIN.

I find it incredible that you fight against the very words and teachings of JESUS and deny
what He is clearly teteaching.
I already thoroughly covered this in post #222.
 
Last edited:
I'd get into the 10 virgins too,,,but the above is enough.
There's even more but if you can't accept the very plain scriptures..........
The wording of the five foolish virgins is all too familiar to the reader of Matthew’s Gospel: Matthew 25:11 - "Later, the other virgins came too, saying, ‘Lord, lord! Let us in!’ 12 But he replied, ‘I tell you the truth, I do not know you!"

Matthew 7:21 - "Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter into the kingdom of heaven" but only the one who does the will of my Father in heaven - (See John 6:40). 22 On that day, many will say to me, ‘Lord, Lord, didn’t we prophesy in your name, and in your name cast out demons and do many powerful works?’ 23 Then I will declare to them, 'I never knew you. Go away from me, you lawbreakers!’ (Matthew 7:21-23)

The difference between the foolish virgins and the wise virgins: The wise virgins had oil for their lamps, while the foolish virgins did not. The wise virgins had the opportunity to obtain oil, and did so. The foolish virgins had plenty of opportunity to get oil, but did not. It's possible to be in close contact with Christ, and with Christians, and yet not be saved. I am reminded of a similar passage in the Gospel of Luke:

Luke 13:23 Someone asked him, "Lord, will only a few be saved?" So he said to them, 24 "Exert every effort to enter through the narrow door, because many, I tell you, will try to enter and will not be able to. 25 Once the head of the house gets up and shuts the door, then you will stand outside and start to knock on the door and beg him, ‘Lord, let us in!’ But he will answer you, ‘I don’t know where you come from.’ 26 Then you will begin to say, ‘We ate and drank in your presence, and you taught in our streets.’ 27 But he will reply, ‘I don’t know where you come from! Go away from me, all you evildoers!’ 28 There will be weeping and gnashing of teeth when you see Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and all the prophets in the kingdom of God but you yourselves thrown out. 29 Then people will come from east and west, and from north and south, and take their places at the banquet table in the kingdom of God. 30 But indeed, some are last who will be first, and some are first who will be last."

Jesus may indeed be warning us in this parable that there will be a number of people who look like Christians, who associate with Christians, and who even think they are Christians, who will be shocked to learn that they are not saved at the return of our Lord and Christ never knew them. What a sobering thought!
Show us some translations that are different.
You like the Greek....go to the Greek!

Here, I'll help you along:

Luke 15 - Click for Chapter

[td]

24

3754 [e]
24

hoti
24

ὅτι
24

For
24

Conj

[/td]






[td]
3778 [e]
houtos
οὗτος
this
DPro-NMS

[/td]






[td]
3588 [e]
ho

-
Art-NMS

[/td]






[td]
5207 [e]
huios
υἱός
son
N-NMS

[/td]






[td]
1473 [e]
mou
μου
of mine
PPro-G1S

[/td]






[td]
3498 [e]
nekros
νεκρὸς
dead
Adj-NMS

[/td]






[td]
1510 [e]
ēn
ἦν ,
was
V-IIA-3S

[/td]






[td]
2532 [e]
kai
καὶ
and
Conj

[/td]






[td]
326 [e]
anezēsen
ἀνέζησεν ;
is alive again
V-AIA-3S

[/td]






[td]
1510 [e]
ēn
ἦν
he was
V-IIA-3S

[/td]

[td]
622 [e]
apolōlōs
ἀπολωλὼς ,
lost
V-RPA-NMS

[/td]

[td]
2532 [e]
kai
καὶ
and
Conj

[/td]

[td]
2

[/td]
Earlier in this post you said - Your Strong's is not necessary. All that is necessary is the New Testament and the words of Jesus. But now you are referring to the Greek. Back peddle much?
Judging from the above....your Greek that you love...
it seems you're mistaken.
Not at all. https://biblehub.com/greek/eze_sen_2198.htm
 
WHAT exactly was Jesus talking about if not being born again?
THE SON asked his father for his inheritance and went off into the world.
HE WAS SAVED.
He was sorry he went off into the world and ABANDONED his father.
HE CAME BACK HOME
AND WAS SAVED AGAIN.
We are not saved over and over again, but only once. We are born again only once. You are mistaken.
Very easy.
You just have to leave your OSAS at the door and you'd understand this VERY SIMPLE passage of scripture.
Spoken by JESUS Himself.
Very easy indeed. CONTEXT - All three parables in Luke 15 were in rebuke to the Pharisees and scribes who complained, saying, “This Man receives sinners and eats with them." (vs. 2) Being made "alive AGAIN" foreshadows the "born AGAIN" experience that Jesus spoke of in John 3:3. Of course Jesus wasn't talking about being born again spiritually again and again. We are born once physically and born "again" once spiritually. I find it interesting that certain translations of Luke 15:32 simply say your brother was dead, and is alive; he was lost, and is found (ESV); your brother was dead, but now he is alive. He was lost, but now he is found (NCV); this brother of yours was dead and has come to life; he was lost and has been found (NRS); this brother of yours was dead and has begun to live and was lost and has been found (NASB).
You don't even believe Jesus.
If we deny Him...He will deny us.
2 Timothy 2:12
I believe Jesus and I already thoroughly covered 2 Timothy 2:12 in post #206.
forget about the different versions Dan.
Whatever a version states MUST AGREE with the NT in its complete, full concept.

And anyway,,,don't worry about the version of the bible.
Use Strong's Greek, which you seem to like when it seems to agree with you.
In this case it doesn't...so we need to use VERSIONS?
You are not fooling me.
There were no versions when Jesus walked this earth.
We better learn what Jesus expects from us.
Jesus does not expect forced, legalistic obedience which culminates in works righteousness.
What were the first works Dan?
Its in Revelation 2:2 "I know your DEEDS and your TOILS".....

What are DEEDS and what is TOIL?
Read verses 2-3.
We repent ONE TIME.
If we TURN BACK TOWARD SATAN
then we become LOST AGAIN.
That may be your biased understanding but I'm not buying it.
I hope you know that REPENT means to turn from satan and walk toward God.
If we're walking toward God we're saved...
If we walk toward satan...we're lost.
Repent means to think differently or afterwards reconsider. Change of mind. See (Acts 11:17,18; 20:21; Acts 26:18).
IF we FALL FROM FAITH...we have turned back to satan and are lost AGAIN, as we were before salvation.
Proverbs 24:16 - For a righteous man may falll (and is lost again? NO) and RISE AGAIN, but the wicked shall fall by calamity. According to your biased belief, so much for God's preservation (Psalm 37:28; Jude 1:1) or Jesus' promise that His sheep will never being snatched from His hand (John 10:27-28) or being sealed with the Holy Spirit, who is the guarantee of our inheritance until the redemption of the purchased possession/unto the day of redemption. (Ephesians 1:13; 4:30) Also, so much for God finishes what He started. (Philippians 1:6) In Romans 8:30, we read - Moreover whom He predestined, these He also called; whom He called, these He also justified; and whom He justified, these He also glorified. *ALL of them. *Notice how Paul uses the past tense for a future event to stress its certainty. :)
I read the last sentence.
You're obsessed with works.
I'm obsessed with faith in Christ, the righteousness which is from God by faith and God's preservation. You are obsessed with works righteousnessp and self preservation.
Sounds like you're the one in a cult...
MAINLINE CHRISTIANITY DOES NOT BELEIVE IN OSAS.
The church that I attend is very much Christian that correctly preaches the gospel (Romans 1:16; 1 Corinthians 15:1-4) and promotes the abundant life. ✝️

Do you consider Roman Catholicism mainline Christianity? They don't believe in OSAS but they do believe in transubstantiation, indulgences, purgetory, infant baptism, perpetual virginity of Mary and salvation by works.
This cult-like belief was invented in the 1800's.
Cults came along a long time AFTER the church was established 2 thousand years ago.
Spoken like a Roman Catholic. Believing in OSAS is not a cult like belief. But believing in a works based false gospel is a cult like belief. Don't confuse me with Mormons and JW's. There were people who believed in OSAS and faith alone before the 1800's and the Bible is much older than the 1800's.
STRAWMAN Dan...that's what they call your argument.
You build a strawman in order to avoid the discussion at hand.

Easier to face the strawman than the facts presented in the NT by JESUS.
You are the master of IRONY.
 
You're not standing on the cross of Christ....
That judgment call is well above your pay grade. I stand on the cross of Christ and not on works righteousness, which is the alternative. (1 Corinthians 1:18-21)
You're leading some down the path of condemnation with an unbiblical belief.
How? So, according to you ALL Christians who believe in OSAS will not be saved? Is believing in OSAS vs. NOSAS the dividing line between saved and condemned or is belief or unbelief the dividing line? (John 3:18; Romans 1:16; 2 Corinthians 4:3,4)
You're hatred of the CC is coloring this belief system which is rejected by most of Christianity
and was NEVER accepted by the early church...EVER...until the 1800's.
Roman Catholics strongly oppose OSAS as do ALL false religions and cults that promote salvation by works. "Nominal" Christians out number genuine Christians. There were people who believed in OSAS and faith alone before the 1800's and the Bible is much older than the 1800's in spite of your biased sales pitch.
Are you going to post some verses that support your incorrect theory that salvation cannot be lost
I already posted multiple verses that support eternal security of the believer. Since you trust in works to maintain your salvation you could not have assurance of salvation because you could never know for sure if you did enough works.
when JESUS Himself stated that it can but which verses you choose to ignore?
Is that what Jesus stated in (John 5:24; 6:38-40; John 10:27-29?)
You choose to IGNORE JESUS...
Yet you say that you stand on the cross of Christ.

Funny stuff Dan.
I have not ignored Jesus in (John 3:15,16,18; 5:24; 6:29,38-40,47; 11:25-26; 10:27-29). You teach that salvation is maintained by works/salvation by works at the back door/works righteousness (Romans 11:6) and then you have the audacity to basically judge me as condemned for believing in OSAS/eternal security/preservation of the saints. :oops:
Let me post this again:
James 3:1
1 Let not many of you become teachers, my brethren, knowing
that as such we will incur a stricter judgment.
Oh, the irony.
 
I have assurance of salvation, and still believe the Bible that says we can fall away.

It's a complete deception to say that you have to believe a lie to be secure in Christ.

I will continue to gladly be called "deranged" for believing God's Word and standing up for it.

But I do fear for those who have embraced Satan's lie and help others justify their apostasy, it will not go well at the Judgment.

Therefore let him who thinks he stands take heed lest he fall (1 Cor. 10:12 NKJ)
Sadly, the pendulum only seems to swing too far to the left or right on this forum when discussing OSAS. I'm tired of being judged unfairly by anti-OSAS extremists on this forum who falsely accuse me of promoting a license to sin, rejecting good works then judging me as lost and condemned. Such folks are making judgment calls that are well above their pay grade.

Now I have a brother who attends the church of the Nazarene and he believes that a Christain can lose their salvation by walking away from the Lord and remaining that way. I disagree that a genuine a Christain would do that but my brother and I do not sit around arguing about it or condemn each other for not believing the other way around. We still accept each other as brothers in Christ based on our faith in Christ.
 
Back
Top Bottom