I have always consider this as Christ here speaking as a man, and the minister of the circumcision, and expresses an human affection for the inhabitants of Jerusalem, and an human desire, for men to come to the truth. He is speaking in his limited knowledge that he possessed in his humanity!"Jerusalem, Jerusalem, who kills the prophets and stones those who are sent to her! How often I WANTED TO GATHER YOUR CHILDREN TOGETHER, the way a hen gathers her chicks under her wings, AND YOU WERE UNWILLING. Behold, your house is being left to you desolate!" Matthew 23:37-38
Instances of the human affection, and will of Christ, may be observed in Mark 10:21 which will of his, though not contrary to the divine will, but subordinate to it, yet not always the same with it, nor always fulfilled: whereas his divine will, or his will as God, is, always fulfilled: "who hath resisted his will?" this cannot be hindered, and made void; he does whatsoever he pleases: and further, that this will of Christ to gather the Jews to himself, is to be understood of his human, and not divine will, is manifest from hence, that this will was in him, and expressed by him at certain several times, by intervals; and therefore he says, "how often would I have gathered," etc. whereas the divine will is one continued, invariable, and unchangeable will, is always the same, and never begins or ceases to be, and to which such an expression is inapplicable; and therefore these words do not contradict the absolute and sovereign will of God, in the distinguishing acts of it, respecting the choice of some persons, and the leaving of others. And it is to be observed, that the persons whom Christ would have gathered, are not represented as being unwilling to be gathered; but their rulers were not willing that they should, and be made proselytes to him, and come under his wings. It is not said, "how often would I have gathered you, and you would not!" nor, "I would have gathered Jerusalem, and she would not"; nor, "I would have gathered thy children, and they would not"; but, "how often would I have gathered thy children, and ye would not!" Which observation alone is sufficient to destroy the argument founded on this passage in favor of free will. The bottom line is that they would, because of their fallen nature which was at enmity against God, thereby, their could not, unless their nature was changed.
Romans 9:16
“So then it is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that sheweth mercy.”You guess wrong, try studying the scriptures and seeking your truth from God's word, not from guessing.Wow, I guess we DO have a free will!! To suggest otherwise is another gospel.

Last edited: