civic
Well-known member
Deflecting and projecting againThis from the side that tries to redefine omniscient? Your self awareness is on vacation.
Deflecting and projecting againThis from the side that tries to redefine omniscient? Your self awareness is on vacation.
Still on vacationDeflecting and projecting again
On the brighter side I just got invited to a golf tournament on my new job with the 2 owners for OctoberThis from the side that tries to redefine omniscient? Your self awareness is on vacation.
Don't beat them. Your new job will be your old job.On the brighter side I just got invited to a golf tournament on my new job with the 2 owners for October
it will be a best ball tournament.Don't beat them. Your new job will be your old job.
Deflecting and projecting again
Thanks I was not aware of those facts- good to know. As I Iike to say these days- I'm Reformed meaning always examining what I believe and reforming those beliefs to line up with Scripture.Omniscience comes from late Latin sensibilities. Omniscience is English word from Latin that was formed from multiple Greek source that was never used relative to all knowledge.
Thusly, there is no manuscript support whatsoever for the term.
Ask a Jew about the historical teaching of "omniscient" in Judaism. They will tell you that the best historical evidence points to the fact that God knows everything that is going on right now. Nothing more.
Thanks I was not aware of those facts- good to know. As I Iike to say these days- I'm Reformed meaning always examining what I believe and reforming those beliefs to line up with Scripture.
You embrace your fatalism. LOL Remeber you believe the cross was fated.
Tom espouses Open Theism
As was noted
You have no answer to the fact the bible teaches
God thinks
God plans
God is stated to be planning
God is stated to change his mind
You have been answered multiple times
He plans discursively and sequentially and in response to changes in man
God knows all that is possible to know that is omniscience
Reality however is not static and changes and God tracks these changes with his dynamic omniscience and plans accordingly
But here you clearly demonstrate you deny what the bible teaches because of your theology
You are a fatalist and
You should Embrace your fatalism
You are a fatalist and should embrace what you areI'm not a fatalist but there is no doubt you have embraced Open Theism and now reject historical Christianity.
Your a Open Theist and should embrace what are. Mrs. "the future is open".You are a fatalist and should embrace what you are
You however cannot prove your view from the bible which instead teaches God thinks, God plans, God changes his mind based upon changes in man.
God does not determine your sin so that fatalistically you can do no other.
And you are a fatalist. All you ever did and will do was determined before you were ever born and you cannot change a single thing.Your a Open Theist and should embrace what are. Mrs. "the future is open".
Just as, according to you, Christ was fated to go to the cross. His choice was irrelevant. He did not choose to die for you, it was His fate. YIKES
So was the Holocaust determined to occur or did God simply allow it to occur?
No definition of omniscience requires God to know what is not Alethically trueThis from the side that tries to redefine omniscient? Your self awareness is on vacation.
Nope. My choices are part of what is determined. Not so in fatalism.And you are a fatalist. All you ever did and will do was determined before you were ever born and you cannot change a single thing.
That is fatalism
Further you conflate your view with mine
My view and Scripture affirm Christ of his own free will laid down his life
John 10:17–18 (KJV 1900) — 17 Therefore doth my Father love me, because I lay down my life, that I might take it again. 18 No man taketh it from me, but I lay it down of myself. I have power to lay it down, and I have power to take it again. This commandment have I received of my Father.
So it is either ignorance or deception to claim my view is that Christ had no choise
He is trying to avoid defending his fatalismI watched a great video with a review of a James White debate where he denied being a determinist/fatalist and called himself a decreeist. Looking up the LBC and WCF definitions of Gods decree its obvious it means determinist/fatalist. Talk about De Nile. Seems to be what @Presby02 is doing as well.
They redefine words and have their own self made dictionaries and definitions rofl.
Tom is trying to avoid her Open Theism. "The future is open"He is trying to avoid defending his fatalism
No definition of omniscience requires God to know what is not Alethically true
Sorry that is the classic definition of fatalism and the dictionary stated so.Nope. My choices are part of what is determined. Not so in fatalism.
Nope. You said determined equals fatalism. The cross was determined and therefore involves fate. Christ's choice made no difference. It was inconsequential.
You said determinism and fatalism are synonymous terms. Which would also mean creation itself is fate. God had no choice. Yikes. You make it to easy.
Where does it say Christ had to agree to and then it was fated? LOL That is not how fate works. Your choices have nothing to do with it.Sorry that is the classic definition of fatalism and the dictionary stated so.
The cross was determined after Christ agreed to it. Nothing at all like your actions being determined before you were born
To further demonstrate your confusion, it should be noted God freely created the world. He was not determined to create.
You really have no understanding of these issues