Matthias
Well-known member
“… the differentiation between o theos as the one who speaks in both eras and huios as his final means of speaking shows that in the author’s mind it was not the Triune God of Christian theology who spoke to the forefathers by the prophets. That is to say, for the author of Hebrews (as for all NT writers, one may suggest) ‘the God of our fathers,’ Yahweh, was no other than ‘the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ’ (compare Acts 2:30 and 2:33; 3:13 and 3:18; 3:25 and 3:26; also note 5:30). Such a conclusion is entirely consistent with the regular NT usage of o theos. It would be inappropriate for elohim or YHVH ever to refer to the Trinity in the OT when in the NT theos regularly refers to the Father alone and never to the Trinity.”
(Murray J. Harris, Jesus As God: The New Testament Use of Theos in Reference to Jesus, p. 47, fn. 112)
For those who may not be familiar with Dr. Harris, he is professor emeritus of New Testament exegesis and theology at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School in Deerfield, Illinois. He obtained his PhD from the University of Manchester, studying under someone whom readers are probably much more familiar with, F.F. Bruce.
It’s nice to see trinitarian support for my Jewish monotheism. Joe Average Trinitarian (JAT) may not agree that it is nice to see, but there it is.
(Murray J. Harris, Jesus As God: The New Testament Use of Theos in Reference to Jesus, p. 47, fn. 112)
For those who may not be familiar with Dr. Harris, he is professor emeritus of New Testament exegesis and theology at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School in Deerfield, Illinois. He obtained his PhD from the University of Manchester, studying under someone whom readers are probably much more familiar with, F.F. Bruce.
It’s nice to see trinitarian support for my Jewish monotheism. Joe Average Trinitarian (JAT) may not agree that it is nice to see, but there it is.
Last edited: