The Trinity made easy

[Wrangler]

Hermeneutical style-impossible to give one or two liners-correct?
J.

What you call hermeneutics, I call trinitarian exegesis, which necessary requires quantity to make up for quality at every turn.

For instance, the Anointed said, "Follow me." He did not provide a comprehensive Hermeneutical style analysis of all OT verses with the action he was going on about. If it is complicated, not only is it bad but usually wrong. There is one God and his name is YHWH. Ex 3:15. Simple. Your refuting will not be.

 

[Wrangler]

Indicative of the fact you have not read my posts-plural brother-and there's more. THE Malack is not the same as A Malack-not if you are familiar with Hebrew and etymologies.

So, you are asking rhetorical questions. I have no desire to become familiar with Hebrew etymologies and I deny the implied claim that it is necessary to understand the Word of God.

 

[Wrangler]

Let me know if you are interested in doing grammatical studies

Gag me with a spoon. I graduated from elementary school some time ago.

 

[Johann]

Gag me with a spoon. I graduated from elementary school some time ago.

Guess you know what I'm saying is truth then?

 

[Johann]

So, you are asking rhetorical questions. I have no desire to become familiar with Hebrew etymologies and I deny the implied claim that it is necessary to understand the Word of God.

For me it is, not with perfect epignosis-but Imperative.
Johann.

 

[Johann]

So, you are asking rhetorical questions. I have no desire to become familiar with Hebrew etymologies and I deny the implied claim that it is necessary to understand the Word of God.

As you have no desire to read what was posted brother-I am familiar with circular reasoning.
Thanks
Johann.

 

[Wrangler]

Guess you know what I'm saying is truth then?

What you are saying is not the truth but the exact opposite of the truth. The truth is Jesus' God is the only true God and his name is YHWH - not Jesus. Simple.

What is the title of this thread? The Trinity made easy. You have demonstrated this anti-truth by the dozens of paragraphs needed to explain what you claim is true.

P1. If the trinity were true, it would be easy to explain.
P2. The trinity is more than not easy but impossible to explain because it is inherently contradictory.
C. The trinity is not true.

 

[Wrangler]

I am familiar with circular reasoning.

You sure are! All trinitarians are familiar with circular reasoning.

 

[civic]

You sure are! All trinitarians are familiar with circular reasoning.

If we are being honest all of us do that at times.

don't think thats exclusive with us as its inclusive with all faiths.

We surely do not have a monopoly on it.

 

[synergy]

Who did you think the angel of the Lord was in the O.T. that was called YHWH and worshiped by them ?

The way I understand it, the Angel of the Lord in the OT was the Pre-incarnate Son of God. That's called a Theophany in Trinitarian circles.

CC: @Johann

 

[civic]

The way I understand it, the Angel of the Lord in the OT was the Pre-incarnate Son of God. That's called a Theophany in Trinitarian circles.

CC: @Johann

And a Christophany as well

 

[Johann]

The way I understand it, the Angel of the Lord in the OT was the Pre-incarnate Son of God.

CC: @Johann

Correct.
But don't take my word for it-study it for yourself.
I have hundreds of sources from the rabbins confirming this fact.
Johann.

 

[Johann]

And a Christophany as well

 

[Wrangler]

If we are being honest all of us do that at times.

don't think thats exclusive with us as its inclusive with all faiths.

We surely do not have a monopoly on it.

From what I can tell, trinitarians have a working monopoly on Circular Reasoning but I admit it is not necessarily exclusive to them.

Let's do a little test. Is God one or three?

 

[civic]

From what I can tell, trinitarians have a working monopoly on Circular Reasoning but I admit it is not necessarily exclusive to them.

Let's do a little test. Is God one or three?

False dichotomy fallacy

Is a husband and wife 2 or One ?

 

[Wrangler]

False dichotomy fallacy

Is a husband and wife 2 or One ?

LOL Not false dichotomy, a metaphysical one. A husband and wife are 2. The way you know that is how many seats they occupy on a plane.

 

[atpollard]

LOL Not false dichotomy, a metaphysical one. A husband and wife are 2. The way you know that is how many seats they occupy on a plane.

How many people is a pregnant woman? (One seat on a plane. )

 

[Wrangler]

How many people is a pregnant woman? (One seat on a plane. )

We all know your best shot is to play word games; to contrive an oddly worded question in the hopes of the desired answer.

A pregnant woman is one person.

If you are breathing for 2 people or eating for 2 people, it does not make you 2 people.

Per the Shema, God is one, alone. No translation says God is 3-in-1.

 

[praise_yeshua]

Correct.
But don't take my word for it-study it for yourself.
I have hundreds of sources from the rabbins confirming this fact.
Johann.

Theophany.......

 

[praise_yeshua]

We all know your best shot is to play word games; to contrive an oddly worded question in the hopes of the desired answer.

A pregnant woman is one person.

If you are breathing for 2 people or eating for 2 people, it does not make you 2 people.

Per the Shema, God is one, alone. No translation says God is 3-in-1.

John 14:9 Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known me, Philip? he that hath seen me hath seen the
Father; and how sayest thou then, Shew us the Father?

Does Jesus Christ perfectly reflect the Father?