Thus, you do not have a case.
Salvation and Unitarians
- Thread starter praise_yeshua
- Start date
Thus, you do not have a case.
Pancho Frijoles
Active member
Of course these 30 verses are not the same kind of verses than Thomas exclamation.
As you have pointed out, Thomas exclamation does not make explicit reference to "Jesus Christ" or "The Father", while the other 30 verses do.
So, the 30 verses are more relevant to the question "Who is God: The Father, Jesus, or both?"
Let me repeat the results from the examination of these verses:
- In 100% The title "God" is given only to the Father
- In 0% the title "God" is given to both the Father and Jesus.
- The title, therefore, is never swapped.
Pancho Frijoles
Active member
Perhaps I am lazy enough and near-sighted enough as to love a God in the way the Bible presents Him in 95% of the cases. That is, as One Person.
That's my choice, and I am pretty sure that was Jesus' choice, as He referred to God as One Person in 100% of the cases.
'
If you CAN love God as an attribute, or as a Council, I will be surprised, but I will not judge you.
Last edited:
Pancho Frijoles
Active member
On the contrary, they are more relevant for the question being debated.
More relevant because they present a head-to-head comparison... and besides, because they are THIRTY.
When some doctrine is subject of debate, it is much more difficult to dispute 30 verses than to dispute one.
Are you willing to declare publicly that you believe that those 30 verses are not applicable for the debate "Who is God: The Father, Jesus, or both?"
Last edited:
Pancho Frijoles
Active member
OK, so you ruled out alternative explanation number 1.
I also don't like alternative explanation number 1.
Let's explore then the rest of the alternative explanations
In total disregard of the other evidence that contradicts your false view.
Nope, because it is not the same at all.
Refuting all of your confusion is something I don't want to do all in one day.
It's an enormous task.
Similar threads
