Nope not a chance except for he two promoting PSAAnyone observing can readily discern that it is you, my friend, who is avoiding the matter at hand.
J.
You admitted it’s AI do I need to quote youColui che qui sta 'schivando' sei tu, amico-evidente a tutti.
One problem, you don't know what I use and don't use and I am your problem.
J.
---for "he two--?"Nope not a chance except for he two promoting PSA
The two people promoting PSA in these threads , you and dizerner.---for "he two--?"
J.
Really? Well stay warm and safe."Frosty"
J.
The two people promoting PSA in these threads , you and dizerner.
To raise a more controversial question, if it’s true that God’s wrath must be appeased by sacrificing his own Son, then don’t we have to conclude that pagans who have throughout history sacrificed their children to appease the gods’ wrath had the right intuition, even if they expressed it in the wrong way?No, it is NOT a danger to see that sin makes God angry and wrathful, and that our sin put Jesus on the Cross to die in our place.
You are gravely, gravely mistaken.
The wrath of God is against all ungodliness, it is not "karma" that punishes our sins.
If God were permissive love that doesn't care about sin, he wouldn't even bother to have Jesus tortured and die for sins.
That does not compute.
The CORE of the Gospel is being betrayed by a lot of Christians these days, showing their walk has no fear of God.
I never looked at the Trinity as being three people before. Is that in the Bible?You mean five.
You forgot the Father, Son and Holy Ghost.![]()
To raise a more controversial question, if it’s true that God’s wrath must be appeased by sacrificing his own Son, then don’t we have to conclude that pagans who have throughout history sacrificed their children to appease the gods’ wrath had the right intuition, even if they expressed it in the wrong way?
I never looked at the Trinity as being three people before. Is that in the Bible?
Prove to me that my post was AI-generated, if you can. Otherwise, you are only exposing yourself in your persistent effort to defame both me and the truth of the Scriptures (Proverbs 19:5 -"A false witness shall not be unpunished, and he that speaketh lies shall not escape.").You admitted it’s AI do I need to quote you
I'll check it out. But It doesn't sound right to me. I know that a lot of cult leaders think they are part of the trinity.Absolutely, they are described as three identities possessing divine attributes with relational attributes to each other and creation.
I have many threads on it here in this forum.
So i could discover for the first time the awe and wonder of how God became a man to redeem me!
- Dizerner
- Replies: 91
- Forum: The Trinity
DittoPSA Is not just about Jesus Dying on the cross. We all understand that. The problem is in God pouring out His wrath on Jesus.
Where does the Bible explicitly say that God poured out His wrath on Jesus? No where! There are Bible verses That may sound like it but they are only an implication of PSA. Not a real teaching but a theologians opinion.
YepI'll check it out. But It doesn't sound right to me. I know that a lot of cult leaders think they are part of the trinity.
PSA Is not just about Jesus Dying on the cross. We all understand that. The problem is in God pouring out His wrath on Jesus.
Where does the Bible explicitly say that God poured out His wrath on Jesus? No where! There are Bible verses That my sound like it
I'll check it out. But It doesn't sound right to me. I know that a lot of cult leaders think they are part of the trinity.
I can help, but not before I clear the air on a harasser here, stalking me relentlessly, with the proper authorities @Affinity.PSA Is not just about Jesus Dying on the cross. We all understand that. The problem is in God pouring out His wrath on Jesus.
Where does the Bible explicitly say that God poured out His wrath on Jesus? No where! There are Bible verses That my sound like it but they are only an implication of PSA. Not a real teaching but a theologians opinion.
What are you talking about? Please don't take the molested child to the shed in the backyard. And leave the weasels alone they never did anything to you...I hope.How can you disconnected Jesus dying on the Cross from your sin, though?
See, that's the problem with all those who fight against PSA—they no longer really have a valid reason for Jesus to be tortured and die under the curse of the Law.
It was your sin, that put Jesus there, not someone else's.
Not the Romans.
Not Pilot.
Not the Pharisees.
It was your sin!
By that logic, where does the Bible explicitly say molesting a child is wrong, oh, it does not. You have to actually listen to the spirit of something and make deductions and hear from the Holy Spirit. You are simply not arguing how truth is conveyed. Unitarians want "Jesus said, 'I am God.'" before they believe Jesus is God. Annihiliationists want "Hell is all sinners being tortured by God forever," before they believe in hell. It's a literal fallacy to demand something be stated to your satisfaction when it is already stated satisfactorily. This is the kind of logic kids use to get around rules. "Well, you said don't go in the backyard, but you didn't specifically say I couldn't go in the shed in the backyard, you never even mentioned the shed!" No, this is weasel logic, it's just not honest at all.
Yes, there are Bible verses "that sound like it."
Because that is what the Bible is saying.