Thomas is not writing to anyone or even addressing Jesus.
"Thomas answered and said unto Him..." (John 20:28)
It's not a complete statement. It's words of praise and surprise.
One does not necessarily negate the other.
Thomas is not writing to anyone or even addressing Jesus.
It's not a complete statement. It's words of praise and surprise.
I don't deny this. Jesus did receive some formal training in order to be called "Rabbi."Jesus' teacher is the Father. By the fact that Jesus needed to be taught is indication that he needed to learn something. Those who need to learn something are by default not omniscient. God doesn't lack the divine quality of omniscience, but Jesus did.
John 8
28So Jesus said, “When you have lifted up the Son of Man, then you will know that I am He, and that I do nothing on My own, but speak exactly what the Father has taught Me.
So when Jesus was called "Good teacher" of course he gave deference to God because only God alone is truly the good teacher. Make more sense now?
Receive or reject. There is no medium.
There is nothing said about "non-Hebrew Gentiles." and to add - or trying to add Gentiles - breaks and violates Scripture.The mystery you are quoting from Ephesians 3 is That the Gentiles should be fellowheirs, and of the same body, and partakers of his promise in Christ by the gospel: It is not that Jesus is God.
Now that the OP has already been discussed, if there was anyone in doubt about the non-deity of Jesus still, then the Bible directly and explicitly rules Jesus out as being God. It's perfectly clear in no uncertain terms because it is with language that we are able to understand each other.
The Bible is a coherent literary work, consistent in its language. This means that if language is used to define God as a single person, it should be understood in that way, just as the language would be interpreted for any other individual. This is not to deny that anthropomorphic language may be used to describe God, but outside of this specific context, there is consistency. To suggest otherwise creates a "God language" where the meaning of words is altered, allowing for an arbitrary application that can make the text mean anything—even the opposite of what is stated. Instead of seeking a "God language," the better approach is to accept that the Bible authors used language in a way that allowed readers to understand the text clearly. Trinitarians often accuse others of assuming their doctrine, but the truth is, Trinitarians impose their theology onto the text, overriding a consistent reading of it. Barron 2009
John 17 (KJV)
3And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent.
Ephesians 4 (KJV)
6one God and Father of all, who is over all and through all and in all.
1 Corinthians 8 (KJV)
6yet for us there is but one God, the Father, from whom all things came and for whom we exist. And there is but one Lord, Jesus Christ, through whom all things came and through whom we exist.
He cannot change. He has been blinded and made deaf. That is why he cannot realize what the written word truly says.Jesus gives eternal life. No other person does.
'I give them eternal life and they shall never perish'
Jesus did numerous miracles that no one else could.
He is on a different level.
But i will stop here. You aren't gonna change your view. You are skimming over the surface, rather than really getting the context.
peace out
You are partially right, but if I may inject some Scripture into the matter (and not to ignore the rest of your comment - I just like to keep topics on one idea at a time) do you think it's possible God gave Jesus, and the men he was with, the power to forgive sins? There is a good passage that strongly suggests this.
Matthew 9
5For whether is easier, to say, Thy sins be forgiven thee; or to say, Arise, and walk? 6But that ye may know that the Son of man hath power on earth to forgive sins, (then saith he to the sick of the palsy,) Arise, take up thy bed, and go unto thine house. 7And he arose, and departed to his house. 8But when the multitudes saw it, they marvelled, and glorified God, which had given such power unto men.
'But I say unto you,How do you reckon that isn't a denial of being God?
The bottom line is... Thomas is not a teaching on the trinity. In fact, there's no teaching on the trinity anywhere in the Bible. No whole paragraph or chapter teaching that we should believe or confess that Jesus is God.@Peterlag
You cannot see and you cannot hear for even within the pages of theoften heretical translations of the Jehova Witness' bible the New World Translation https://wol.jw.org/en/wol/b/r1/lp-e/nwtsty/43/20#study=discover
Even they got this right. See especially the bolded red below.
John:
20 On the first day of the week, Mary Magʹda·lene came to the tomb early,+ while it was still dark, and she saw that the stone had already been taken away from the tomb.+ 2 So she came running to Simon Peter and to the other disciple, for whom Jesus had affection,+ and she said to them: “They have taken away the Lord out of the tomb,+ and we do not know where they have laid him.”
3 Then Peter and the other disciple set out for the tomb. 4 The two of them began running together, but the other disciple ran faster than Peter and reached the tomb first. 5 Stooping forward, he saw the linen cloths lying there,+ but he did not go in. 6 Then Simon Peter also came, following him, and he went into the tomb. And he saw the linen cloths lying there. 7 The cloth that had been on his head was not lying with the other cloth bands but was rolled up in a place by itself. 8 Then the other disciple who had reached the tomb first also went in, and he saw and believed. 9 For they did not yet understand the scripture that he must rise from the dead.+ 10 So the disciples went back to their homes.
11 Mary, however, kept standing outside near the tomb, weeping. While she was weeping, she stooped forward to look into the tomb, 12 and she saw two angels+ in white sitting where the body of Jesus had been lying, one at the head and one at the feet. 13 And they said to her: “Woman, why are you weeping?” She said to them: “They have taken my Lord away, and I do not know where they have laid him.” 14 After saying this, she turned around and saw Jesus standing there, but she did not realize that it was Jesus.+ 15 Jesus said to her: “Woman, why are you weeping? Whom are you looking for?” She, thinking it was the gardener, said to him: “Sir, if you have carried him off, tell me where you have laid him, and I will take him away.” 16 Jesus said to her: “Mary!” On turning around, she said to him in Hebrew: “Rab·boʹni!” (which means “Teacher!”) 17 Jesus said to her: “Stop clinging to me, for I have not yet ascended to the Father. But go to my brothers+ and say to them, ‘I am ascending to my Father+ and your Father and to my God+ and your God.’” 18 Mary Magʹda·lene came and brought the news to the disciples: “I have seen the Lord!” And she told them what he had said to her.+
19 When it was late that day, the first day of the week, and the doors were locked where the disciples were for fear of the Jews, Jesus came and stood in their midst and said to them: “May you have peace.”+ 20 After saying this, he showed them his hands and his side.+ Then the disciples rejoiced at seeing the Lord.+ 21 Jesus said to them again: “May you have peace.+ Just as the Father has sent me,+ I also am sending you.”+ 22 After saying this he blew on them and said to them: “Receive holy spirit.+ 23 If you forgive the sins of anyone, they are forgiven; if you retain those of anyone, they are retained.”
24 But Thomas,+ one of the Twelve,+ who was called the Twin, was not with them when Jesus came. 25 So the other disciples were telling him: “We have seen the Lord!” But he said to them: “Unless I see in his hands the print of the nails and stick my finger into the print* of the nails and stick my hand into his side,+ I will never believe it.”+
26 Well, eight days later his disciples were again indoors, and Thomas was with them. Jesus came, although the doors were locked, and he stood in their midst and said: “May you have peace.”+ 27 Next he said to Thomas: “Put your finger here, and see my hands, and take your hand and stick it into my side, and stop doubting* but believe.” 28 In answer Thomas said to him: “My Lord and my God!”+ 29 Jesus said to him: “Because you have seen me, have you believed? Happy are those who have not seen and yet believe.”+
Ephesians 3:3-6There is nothing said about "non-Hebrew Gentiles." and to add - or trying to add Gentiles - breaks and violates Scripture.
The only people in salvation covenant with God are Abraham and his seed, the children of Israel.
Non-Hebrew Gentiles are NOT in covenant with God.
Mixed heritage Hebrews would still be Abraham's seed, but not non-Hebrew Gentiles.
The bottom line is Thomas is not a teaching on the trinity. In fact, there's no teaching on the trinity anywhere in the Bible. No whole paragraph or chapter teaching that we should believe or confess that Jesus is God."Thomas answered and said unto Him..." (John 20:28)
One does not necessarily negate the other.
The bottom line is Thomas is not a teaching on the trinity. In fact, there's no teaching on the trinity anywhere in the Bible. No whole paragraph or chapter teaching that we should believe or confess that Jesus is God.no wonder you are stuck in heretical unitarianism. John 20:28 says that Thomas answered Jesus. There is no other person with the same name as Jesus. In this context it is an expression of Thomas's belief. It is also is true since neither Jesus nor the gospel writer has pointed out an error with what Thomas proclaimed.
Your arguments keep proving to be weak.
The bottom line is Thomas is not a teaching on the trinity.
Okay. Per Peterlag, the Trinity only exists if Thomas said "My Lord and My God and for those who have not heard elsewhere let me say spontaneously that you Jesus are one of the Trinitarian essence of God." and You Peterlag are denying the testimony of Thomas in order to deny the deity of Christ. I prefer what scripture tells us rather than what you pretend to be lack of evidence of Jesus' deity.The bottom line is Thomas is not a teaching on the trinity. In fact, there's no teaching on the trinity anywhere in the Bible. No whole paragraph or chapter teaching that we should believe or confess that Jesus is God.
Can we for sake of conversation leave Thomas out of this at the moment.The bottom line is Thomas is not a teaching on the trinity. In fact, there's no teaching on the trinity anywhere in the Bible. No whole paragraph or chapter teaching that we should believe or confess that Jesus is God.
Jesus could not inherently give eternal life as Scripture states. He had to be granted that authority. So Jesus was given the power to do something he could not do before and he became a life-giving spirit when he previously was not. That's proof that Jesus isn't God because eternal life comes from God in the first place.Jesus gives eternal life. No other person does.
'I give them eternal life and they shall never perish'
Jesus did numerous miracles that no one else could.
He is on a different level.
But i will stop here. You aren't gonna change your view. You are skimming over the surface, rather than really getting the context.
peace out
I didn't make an interpretation. Did you read Matthew 96:-8? It is plain about the only power mentioned in the context as something that was given to the men (Jesus included) by God.your interpretation sounds ludicrous and totally unfounded. How do show this to be a power that other men have?
You haven't read Daniel 7 it seems. Daniel 7:13 is the proof text for the Son of man not being the Ancient of days.Do your homework.
We see that the testimony of the high priest that Jesus's quote of Dan 7:13 indicates Jesus claim to be God. Verse 14 is the more specific point about Jesus reigning over he nations. The kingdom of Christ is synonymous with the kingdom of God since Christ is God.
Mark 14:60–64 (NKJV)
60And the high priest stood up in the midst and asked Jesus, saying, “Do You answer nothing? What is it these men testify against You?”
61But He kept silent and answered nothing. Again the high priest asked Him, saying to Him, “Are You the Christ, the Son of the Blessed?”
62Jesus said, “I am. And you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of the Power, and coming with the clouds of heaven.”
63Then the high priest tore his clothes and said, “What further need do we have of witnesses?
64You have heard the blasphemy! What do you think?” And they all condemned Him to be deserving of death.
The only way that the claim to be God could be nullified here is if Mark had said that the priest's claim was wrong. That surely would have been an appropriate comment for Mark to add if the priest was wrong.