As hard as you may try you will never wins this argument with me. No unitarian or trinitarian has ever done it before. I wish you the best of luck but it’s a lost cause.
No I have just debated many more equipped Unitarians than yourself over the years.Your the undisputed champion in your own mind.
Where is it in the bible ?Meanwhile, back at the ranch …
Historical orthodox trinitarianism teaches us that “Jesus is not a human person”.
The concession has been made by @civic that the Bible does not teach us that “Jesus is not a human person”.
you non biblical arguments are becoming old hat- let me know when you want to use the Bible sometime for anything at anytime.
I'm not the one hung up on human person you are. oh the irony.
Its not a salvific issue
next..............................
I'm a biblical Trinitarian which takes precedence over the creeds. Primary vs secondary. I'm a primary kind of guy.Historical orthodox trinitarianism is hung up on human person.
Historical orthodox trinitarianism teaches that it is a salvation issue,
Historical orthodox trinitarianism doesn’t come from the Bible. It comes from the Church.
Contradiction. Words are created.Jesus, the Uncreated Word of God
I've heard every objection, argument and question under the sun from unitarians over the years 100's of times over. Nothing new here.
Is SHURF an acronymn? If so, can someone tell us what it stands for? If I don't hear from anyone, I'll declare what it stands for.SHURF is the answer. When did that happen? When I became a Jewish monotheist.
I'm a biblical Trinitarian which takes precedence over the creeds. Primary vs secondary. I'm a primary kind of guy.
Is SHURF an acronymn?
If so, can someone tell us what it stands for?
If I don't hear from anyone, I'll declare what it stands for.
I haven't conceded anything you are imagining it. I asked you where it is in the bible. I know what the bible teaches on the topic.It’s the secondary source where you‘re getting your “Jesus is not a human person” belief from. You’ve conceded that the primary source doesn’t teach it.
The implication is that you hold that a man is not a person and that there is something that exists that is human but not a person. Spelling out your illogic.I hold to Jesus is a man, fully man, a human. But not a human person.