Is Jesus God?

[Keiw1]

YHWH is not Jehovah. As noted you do not have a single Hebrew Old Testament or a Greek New testament with Jehovah in it

The Watchtower adds to the word of God

example it adds the word other four times here

Col 1:15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation;
Col 1:16 because by means of him all [other] things were created in the heavens and upon the earth, the things visible and the things invisible, no matter whether they are thrones or lordships or governments or authorities. All [other] things have been created through him and for him.
Col 1:17 Also, he is before all [other] things and by means of him all [other] things were made to exist,

And two hundred thirty seven times it adds Jehovah to the New testament without a single supporting Greek manuscript

Elijah translates-EL(Elohim) is Jehovah,, Hallelujah= praise be to Jehovah.--All know the tetragramoton was in the Hebrew writings= YHWH or YHVH= the name in our language = Jehovah.
Created-THROUGH him= another did the creating.

 

[TomL]

Elijah translates-EL(Elohim) is Jehovah,, Hallelujah= praise be to Jehovah.--All know the tetragramoton was in the Hebrew writings= YHWH or YHVH= the name in our language = Jehovah.
Created-THROUGH him= another did the creating.

Again the Watchtower added the name Jehovah where YHWH does not appear in the New Testament 237 times

they added the word other to the text Col 1:16, 17

It is not an honest translation

 

[Keiw1]

Again the Watchtower added the name Jehovah where YHWH does not appear in the New Testament 237 times

they added the word other to the text Col 1:16, 17

It is not an honest translation

Then why did the divine name kjv in 2015 put Gods name in the NT in those 237 spots?

 

[TomL]

Then why did the divine name kjv in 2015 put Gods name in the NT in those 237 spots?

Because in 2015 someone decided to do so

Show there is manuscript support for it when we both know however there is none

 

[Keiw1]

Because in 2015 someone decided to do so

Show there is manuscript support for it when we both know however there is none

They had to have manuscript to go by.

 

[TomL]

They had to have manuscript to go by.

Not with the word Jehovah in it

They simply did what the watchtower did

Add the name apart from any textual evidence

 

[Keiw1]

Not with the word Jehovah in it

They simply did what the watchtower did

Add the name apart from any textual evidence

They rejected the NWT along with all the false religions, thus your reasoning is faulty.

 

[TomL]

They rejected the NWT along with all the false religions, thus your reasoning is faulty.

Sorry you have no defense for the NWT adding to scripture