Look at the promise given to abraham real closely and you will see exactly who it is for .
And in thy seed shall ALLLLLLL the nations of the earth be blessed .
"Nations" refers to the descendants of Ishmael (seed of Abraham) and Esau (seed of Abraham) for at this juncture in Hebrew history "nations" do not mean "Gentile."
Can a non-Hebrew Gentile be born to two Hebrew parents?
God says:
15 And God said unto Abraham, As for Sarai thy wife, thou shalt not call her name Sarai, but Sarah shall her name be. 16 And I will bless her, and give thee a son also of her: yea, I will bless her, and she shall be a mother of
nations;
kings of people shall be
of her. Gen. 17:15–16.
Same thing was said of Abraham:
4 As for me, behold, my covenant is with thee, and
thou shalt be a father of many
nations.
5 Neither shall thy name any more be called Abram, but thy name shall be Abraham; for
a father of many
nations have I made thee. Gen. 17:4–5.
If "nations" means non-Hebrew "Gentiles" do non-Hebrew "Gentiles" really come from two Hebrew parents?
6 And I will make thee exceeding fruitful, and I will make
nations of thee, and
kings shall come
out of thee.
Gen. 17:6.
Again, I ask, do non-Hebrew "Gentiles" really come
out of two Hebrew parents?
THIS PROMISE , pertains to CHRIST JESUS as in HE IS THY SEED , that seed .
Ultimately, yes. Jesus Christ fulfilled the Mosaic Covenant, a covenant that God ordained the animal sacrifice is made yearly to atone for the sins of the Hebrew children of Israel. And if Christ came not to destroy (change) the Law, then His sacrifice in place of the animal is to atone for the sins of the Hebrew children of Israel finally, eternally. For in hindsight, we see this very thing.
And whether one be born a hebrew or a gentile take note the promise was that in THY SEED shall ALL the nations be blessed .
ALL means ALL . Take note , ,however if one rejects THAT SEED , the promise wont apply to any who do such a thing .
But all nations means HEBREW and gentile .
In Genesis, the Hebrew word "eretz" (often translated as "earth") is used to refer to the land God promised to Abraham and his descendants, known as the Promised Land. This land is specifically Canaan, which today corresponds to modern-day Israel and surrounding areas.
While "eretz" can also refer to the entire planet Earth, in the context of the Abrahamic covenant, it specifically denotes the land God promised as a special possession to the Israelites.
And this makes Genesis 12:1-3 understandable:
1 Now the LORD had said unto Abram, Get thee out of thy country, and from thy kindred, and from thy father’s house, unto a land that I will shew thee:
2 And I will make of thee a great nation, and I will bless thee, and make thy name great; and thou shalt be a blessing:
3 And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth ("eretz") be blessed. Gen. 12:1–3.
And again, God is referring to those of the "eretz" that live in the Holy Land.
As far as the hebrew man who became born again
We have examples of certain ones who did so
and we have letters showing the errorneous concept for those to try and go back UNDER the law too .
Then taking your position destroys God's living purpose for His people on at least two counts. Peter and Saul:
23 Being born again, not of corruptible seed, but of incorruptible, by the word of God, which
liveth and abideth for ever.
1 Peter 1:23.
That destroys the false Gentile belief that God's Word is "abolished" or "done away" or "obsolete. For if it is "abolished" and "obsolete" (of no use because it is "obsolete") then so is this instruction to God's people to live holy lives before Him and all they have is leaning on their own understanding in the vanity of their minds:
16 All
[HEBREW] scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable
for
doctrine,
for
reproof,
for
correction,
for
instruction in righteousness:
17 That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works.
2 Timothy 3:16–17.
If God's Law is "abolished" and "obsolete" then God's people have only themselves to decide what's doctrine and instruction in righteousness and without it nothing can be reproved or corrected for everyone is moving about and having thei being ruled by their own understanding.
Sorry, I prefer God's Word to tell me what to believe and why and NOT all these opinions of men who do not obey God's Law. And if they cannot obey God's Law, neither can or will they obey the Law of Christ ("Anointing" = "Spirit") who Authored the "All Scripture" Saul said is necessary for instruction in righteousness, the same Scripture Peter said, "abides and lives forever."
Try reading the letters for yourself . He who justifies himself by the law , HAS FALLEN from Grace .
I don't justify myself by the Law, God does that. And His decision is "Not Guilty! of breaking His Law. Or don't you know the biblical doctrine of justification?
NOW as far as making void the law , No sir we establish the law , the law is spirituial and written upon the heart
of the believer . Every word of GOD is lovey to a lamb .
And the purpose of the law was for trangression of SIN , UNTIL THE SAVOIR CAME .
No, the purpose of the Law was for man to learn the difference between themselves and God. It served two purposes: one is for the sinner, the other is so the sinner know how He's fallen short of God's standards He placed on Himself and why man cannot obey/fulfill them, for he who fails in one fails in all and through the Spirit's help know the difference between a holy God and sinful man.
If you look to the law to establish your own righteousness and walk not by Faith , beware
for in the end you will hear , I NEVER KNEW YOU .
The Hebrew people walked by sight and that was when they followed God, then they walked by faith.
When they SAW the pillar of fire by night and the cloud by day move, then they moved too. Walking by sight.
And if we use the grace of GOD as an excuse to walk in sin, Beware cause that heart DOES NOT KNOW GOD
at all and follows another version of what it believes is GOD and is CHRIST but is only a flesh feeder a man pleaser
and thus , ITS NOT GOD , CHRIST OR SPIRIT that man do follow .
I'm not the one who teaches the "abolishment" or "obsolescence" of the Law of God as you said above.
GOD did not send the SON so we could now continue to walk in sin or justify sin .
Who's "we?" If you say, "Gentiles", then you will be in error for God made no covenant nor did He give His Law to non-Hebrew Gentiles.
HE came to set us free FROM SIN .
so keep that in mind as well . FOR many use the name of JESUS and yet the jesus
they seem to love and to preach holds rainbows and hundred dollar bills and contradicts the very teachings of CHRIST
THAT ONE AINT JESUS . its the dark one who has come in his own name to decieve those whose desire
was for the flesh and NOT GOD .
I think your Gentile indoctrination has gone askew, and it happened when you began feeding yourself Gentile theology which is in contradiction to biblical theology.
And the bottom of my every comment is the words: Biblical Christianity.
You should learn what that is from the Bible and not from men - especially Gentile "men." (Oh, there's Gentile women also that have fallen for Gentile theology.)
You have picked your side, and it is not God's side.