I teach what the Bible teaches, unlike many on this forum:
All men sin and are cut off from God because of it.
Jesus became a man so that He could be our kinsman redeemer.
He lived a perfect life so that He would be the perfect sacrifice, taking our punishment for sin so that we could receive His purity and be saved.
Jesus said that unless you are born of both water (water baptism) and the Spirit (the working of the Holy Spirit) you cannot enter the Kingdom of God.
Jesus said that whoever believes and is baptized will be saved.
Peter tells us that baptism saves us.
Paul tells us that it is in baptism that the Holy Spirit removes our sins and unites us to Jesus' death and resurrection.
Paul tells us that it is in baptism that we are clothed with Christ.
These last five are direct connections between baptism and salvation.
John 3:5 simply says "water" and the Spirit and
not (water baptism). You read your personal bias into the verse and
added to scripture. In John 3:15,16,18 Jesus makes the connection between
belief and salvation "apart from water baptism." Elsewhere in the book of John, Jesus further makes the same connection. (5:24; 6:29,40,47; 11:25,26) In the very next chapter, Jesus mentions "living water" in John 4:10, 14 and He
connects living water with eternal life in John 4:14. Also, in John 7:38-39, we read - "He who believes in Me, as the Scripture has said,
out of his heart will flow rivers of
living water. But this He spoke
concerning the Spirit. The Holy Spirit is the
source of living water (which reaches the heart)
and spiritual cleansing.
If "water" is arbitrarily defined as baptism, then we could just as justifiably say, "Out of his heart will flow rivers of living baptism" in John 7:38. If this sounds ridiculous, it is no more so than the idea that water baptism is the source or the means of becoming born again. Also "water" is used in the Bible as an
emblem of the word of God, and in such uses it is
associated with cleansing or washing. (John 15:3; Ephesians 5:26) When we are born again, the Holy Spirit begets new life, so that we are said to become "partakers of the divine nature." (2 Peter 1:4) The new birth is brought to pass through "incorruptible seed, by the
word of God, which lives and abides forever" (I Peter 1:23) and the Holy Spirit accomplishes the miracle of regeneration. (Titus 3:5)
So, to automatically read "baptism" into John 3:5 simply because it mentions "water" is unwarranted.
Mark 16:16 - He who believes and is baptized will be saved
(general cases without making a qualification for the unusual case of someone who believes but is not baptized) but he who
does not believe will be condemned. The omission of baptized with "does not believe" shows that Jesus does not make baptism absolutely necessary for salvation. Condemnation rests on unbelief and not on a lack of baptism. *NOWHERE does the Bible say, "baptized or condemned." If water baptism is absolutely required for salvation, then we would expect Jesus to mention it in the following verses. (3:15,16,18; 5:24; 6:29,40,47; 11:25,26) Yet what is the 1 requirement that Jesus mentions 9 different times in each of these complete statements *
BELIEVES. *What happened to baptism? *Hermeneutics.
John 3:18 - He who
believes in Him is not condemned; but he who (is not water baptized? - NO)
does not believe is condemned already, because he has not (been water baptized? - NO)
because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.
In Peter 3:21, Peter tells us that baptism now saves you
(I noticed you stopped right there and ignored the rest) yet when Peter uses this phrase
he continues in the same sentence to explain exactly what he means by it. He said that baptism now saves you-
not the removal of dirt from the flesh (that is, not as an outward, physical act which washes dirt from the body--that is not what saves you),
"but an appeal to God for a good conscience, through the resurrection of Jesus Christ" (that is, as an inward, spiritual transaction between God and the individual, a transaction that is
symbolized by the outward ceremony of water baptism).
*Just as the eight people in the ark were "saved
THROUGH water" as they were
IN THE ARK. They were not literally saved "by" the water. Hebrews 11:7 is clear on this point (..built an
ARK for the
SAVING of his household). *The context reveals that ONLY the righteous (Noah and his family) were DRY and therefore SAFE. In contrast,
only the wicked in Noah's day came in contract with the water and they all perished.
Removal of sin/being united with Christ in His death, burial and resurrection/clothed in Christ is
SIGNIFIED in water but
NOT PROCURED. As Greek scholar AT Robertson said -
A symbol is not the reality but is a picture of the reality. You need to learn how to read scripture in context and properly harmonize scripture with scripture before reaching your conclusion on doctrine. Your
eisegesis is noted.