He that believes and is not water baptised is saved

Faith is not works. To be sure, a “faith” wrongly understood to be something it isn’t might be “works.” But so long as one means what the Bible means by faith, the Bible itself is the basis for this absolute distinction.

Then salvation by faith is not salvation by works. One may deny salvation by faith on some other grounds, if he wishes. Like his view of depravity, for example, or his view of election, but the very thing he cannot do is deny it by equating it with salvation by works.

Scripture prevents that equation. The very places we learn that salvation is not by works are the places we learn that it is by faith.

And salvation by faith is in perfect harmony with salvation by grace. Once again, it is the Scripture that teaches us this; indeed, salvation is by faith in order that it may be according to grace.
Faith is thinking. It is works going on in your mind and your conscience. Once you speak faith, that is a work of your thought process. You can’t get away from it. Speaking is works. Confession is works.
 
Faith is thinking. It is works going on in your mind and your conscience. Once you speak faith, that is a work of your thought process. You can’t get away from it. Speaking is works. Confession is works.
You can't get away with trying to convince others of what's going on in your mind, because it's nonsensical.
 
This clearly explains why "he that He believes and is not water baptized is saved"


Acts 2:38, “And Peter said to them, ‘Repent, and let each of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins; and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.’” As with any single verse or passage, we discern what it teaches by first filtering it through what we know the Bible teaches on the subject at hand. In the case of baptism and salvation, the Bible is clear that salvation is by grace through faith in Jesus Christ, not by works of any kind, including baptism (Ephesians 2:8-9). So, any interpretation which comes to the conclusion that baptism, or any other act, is necessary for salvation, is a faulty interpretation. For more information, please visit our webpage on "Is salvation by faith alone, or by faith plus works?"

Why, then, do some come to the conclusion that we must be baptized in order to be saved? Often, the discussion of whether or not this passage teaches baptism is required for salvation centers around the Greek word eis that is translated “for” in this passage. Those who hold to the belief that baptism is required for salvation are quick to point to this verse and the fact that it says “be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins,” assuming that the word translated “for” in this verse means “in order to get.” However, in both Greek and English, there are many possible usages of the word “for.”

As an example, when one says “Take two aspirin for your headache,” it is obvious to everybody that it does not mean “take two aspirin in order to get your headache,” but instead to “take two aspirin because you already have a headache.” There are three possible meanings of the word “for” that might fit the context of Acts 2:38: 1--“in order to be, become, get, have, keep, etc.,” 2—“because of, as the result of,” or 3—“with regard to.” Since any one of the three meanings could fit the context of this passage, additional study is required in order to determine which one is correct.

We need to start by looking back to the original language and the meaning of the Greek word eis. This is a common Greek word (it is used 1774 times in the New Testament) that is translated many different ways. Like the English word “for” it can have several different meanings. So, again, we see at least two or three possible meanings of the passage, one that would seem to support that baptism is required for salvation and others that would not. While both the meanings of the Greek word eis are seen in different passages of Scripture, such noted Greek scholars as A.T. Robertson and J.R. Mantey have maintained that the Greek preposition eis in Acts 2:38 should be translated “because of” or “in view of,” and not “in order to,” or “for the purpose of.”

One example of how this preposition is used in other Scriptures is seen in Matthew 12:41 where the word eis communicates the “result” of an action. In this case it is said that the people of Nineveh “repented at the preaching of Jonah” (the word translated “at” is the same Greek word eis). Clearly, the meaning of this passage is that they repented “because of’” or “as the result of” Jonah’s preaching. In the same way, it would be possible that Acts 2:38 is indeed communicating the fact that they were to be baptized “as the result of” or “because” they already had believed and in doing so had already received forgiveness of their sins (John 1:12; John 3:14-18; John 5:24; John 11:25-26; Acts 10:43; Acts 13:39; Acts 16:31; Acts 26:18; Romans 10:9; Ephesians 1:12-14). This interpretation of the passage is also consistent with the message recorded in Peter’s next two sermons to unbelievers where he associates the forgiveness of sins with the act of repentance and faith in Christ without even mentioning baptism (Acts 3:17-26; Acts 4:8-12).

In addition to Acts 2:38, there are three other verses where the Greek word eis is used in conjunction with the word “baptize” or “baptism.” The first of these is Matthew 3:11, “baptize you with water for repentance.” Clearly the Greek word eis cannot mean “in order to get” in this passage. They were not baptized “in order to get repentance,” but were “baptized because they had repented.” The second passage is Romans 6:3 where we have the phrase “baptized into (eis) His death.” This again fits with the meaning “because of” or in "regard to." The third and final passage is 1 Corinthians 10:2 and the phrase “baptized into (eis) Moses in the cloud and in the sea.” Again, eis cannot mean “in order to get” in this passage because the Israelites were not baptized in order to get Moses to be their leader, but because he was their leader and had led them out of Egypt. If one is consistent with the way the preposition eis is used in conjunction with baptism, we must conclude that Acts 2:38 is indeed referring to their being baptized “because” they had received forgiveness of their sins. Some other verses where the Greek preposition eis does not mean “in order to obtain” are Matthew 28:19; 1 Peter 3:21; Acts 19:3; 1 Corinthians 1:15; and 12:13.

The grammatical evidence surrounding this verse and the preposition eis are clear that while both views on this verse are well within the context and the range of possible meanings of the passage, the majority of the evidence is in favor that the best possible definition of the word “for” in this context is either “because of” or “in regard to” and not “in order to get.” Therefore, Acts 2:38, when interpreted correctly, does not teach that baptism is required for salvation.

Besides the precise meaning of the preposition translated “for” in this passage, there is another grammatical aspect of this verse to carefully consider—the change between the second person and third person between the verbs and pronouns in the passage. For example, in Peter’s commands to repent and be baptized the Greek verb translated “repent” is in the second person plural while the verb “be baptized,” is in the third person singular. When we couple this with the fact that the pronoun “your” in the phrase “forgiveness of your sins” is also second person plural, we see an important distinction being made that helps us understand this passage. The result of this change from second person plural to third person singular and back would seem to connect the phrase “forgiveness of your sins” directly with the command to “repent.” Therefore, when you take into account the change in person and plurality, essentially what you have is “You (plural) repent for the forgiveness of your (plural) sins, and let each one (singular) of you be baptized (singular).” Or, to put it in a more distinct way: “You all repent for the forgiveness of all of your sins, and let each one of you be baptized.”

Another error that is made by those who believe Acts 2:38 teaches baptism is required for salvation is what is sometimes called the Negative Inference Fallacy. Simply put, this is the idea that just because a statement is true, we cannot assume all negations (or opposites) of that statement are true. In other words, just because Acts 2:38 says “repent and be baptized….for the forgiveness of sins…and the gift of the Holy Spirit,” does not mean that if one repents and is not baptized, he will not receive forgiveness of sins or the gift of the Holy Spirit.

There is an important difference between a condition of salvation and a requirement for salvation. The Bible is clear that belief is both a condition and a requirement, but the same cannot be said for baptism. The Bible does not say that if a man is not baptized then he will not be saved. One can add any number of conditions to faith (which is required for salvation), and the person can still be saved. For example if a person believes, is baptized, goes to church, and gives to the poor he will be saved. Where the error in thinking occurs is if one assumes all these other conditions, “baptism, going to church, giving to the poor,” are required for one to be saved. While they might be the evidence of salvation, they are not a requirement for salvation. (For a more thorough explanation of this logical fallacy, please see the Question: Does Mark 16:16 teach that baptism is required for salvation?).

The fact that baptism is not required to receive forgiveness and the gift of the Holy Spirit should also be evident by simply reading a little farther in the book of Acts. In Acts 10:43, Peter tells Cornelius that “through His name everyone who believes in Him receives forgiveness of sins” (please note that nothing at this point has been mentioned about being baptized, yet Peter connects believing in Christ with the act of receiving forgiveness for sins). The next thing that happens is, having believed Peter’s message about Christ, the “Holy Spirit fell upon all those who were listening to the message” (Acts 10:44). It is only after they had believed, and therefore received forgiveness of their sins and the gift of the Holy Spirit, that Cornelius and his household were baptized (Acts 10:47-48). The context and the passage are very clear; Cornelius and his household received both forgiveness of sins and the Holy Spirit before they were ever baptized. In fact, the reason Peter allowed them to be baptized was that they showed evidence of receiving the Holy Spirit “just as Peter and the Jewish believers” had.

In conclusion, Acts 2:38 does not teach that baptism is required for salvation. While baptism is important as the sign that one has been justified by faith and as the public declaration of one’s faith in Christ and membership in a local body of believers, it is not the means of remission or forgiveness of sins. The Bible is very clear that we are saved by grace alone through faith alone in Christ alone (John 1:12; John 3:16; Acts 16:31; Romans 3:21-30; Romans 4:5; Romans 10:9-10; Ephesians 2:8-10; Philippians 3:9; Galatians 2:16).

Got?
 
Work is dealing with you. I didn't even have to think for that one it's obvious that you're just trying to be obnoxious
No, I am trying to get you folks to think.

#1...Paul taught that OT Law was works....Modern Christendom teaches Acts 2:38 is works.

#2...Modern Christendom teaches thinking deeply(faith) and confessing such faith is not human work, but God doing it.

#3...many even teach repenting is a work, so repenting is not needed to be saved.

Everything they teach is self debunking with scripture, but the masses follow it like lemmings.

Why? They heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears....Happy with PARTIAL truth and a PARTIAL experience.
 
Last edited:
No, I am trying to get you folks to think.

#1...Paul taught that OT Law was works....Modern Christendom teaches Acts 2:38 is works.

#2...Modern Christendom teaches thinking deeply(faith) and confessing such faith is not human work, but God doing it.

#3...many even teach repenting is a work, so repenting is not needed to be saved.

Everything they teach is self debunking with scripture, but the masses follow it like lemmings.

Why? They heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears....Happy with PARTIAL truth and a PARTIAL experience.
You need to work out your own salvation. Everything you posted here is just your opinion you haven't backed anything up with any proof or any logic. People that come here and post are quite able to think for themselves.
 
This thread has been reopened.
For this "back Uphill" Word Of Truth, Rightly Divided?:

water baptism for the remission of sins is found in:

prophecy / covenants / law, for Israel - ie:

water, For remission of sins/induction into the earthly Israeli "priesthood!":​
(Matthew_3:5-6; Mark_1:4; Luke_3:3; John_1:31; Luke 7:29-30; Acts_10:37)​
(Matthew_28:19; Mark_16:16; Acts_2:38, 22:16; Ezekiel_36:25; Isaiah 52:15)​
Rightly Divided (2 Timothy 2:15 AV) From “Things That Differ!” (online):

In God's Other 'Context' of Mystery and Grace, He Now Teaches, for Induction Into
The Heavenly Body Of Christ, there is only:

One [ Spiritual ] Baptism

Praise His Holy Name!

Amen.
 
Here is the order of salvation and then baptism right here:

(Act 16:28) But Paul cried with a loud voice, saying, Do thyself no harm: for we are all here.
(Act 16:29) Then he called for a light, and sprang in, and came trembling, and fell down before Paul and Silas,
(Act 16:30) And brought them out, and said, Sirs, what must I do to be saved?
(Act 16:31) And they said, Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house.
(Act 16:32) And they spake unto him the word of the Lord, and to all that were in his house.
(Act 16:33) And he took them the same hour of the night, and washed their stripes; and was baptized, he and all his, straightway.

Saved first. And with his salvation.. the affect of his testimony leading his whole family to be saved.

Within the hour they were baptised. In these times, people were baptised very soon after conversion, mostly straight away.

There it is.
 
Here is the order of salvation and then baptism right here:

(Act 16:28) But Paul cried with a loud voice, saying, Do thyself no harm: for we are all here.
(Act 16:29) Then he called for a light, and sprang in, and came trembling, and fell down before Paul and Silas,
(Act 16:30) And brought them out, and said, Sirs, what must I do to be saved?
(Act 16:31) And they said, Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house.
(Act 16:32) And they spake unto him the word of the Lord, and to all that were in his house.
(Act 16:33) And he took them the same hour of the night, and washed their stripes; and was baptized, he and all his, straightway.

Saved first. And with his salvation.. the affect of his testimony leading his whole family to be saved.

Within the hour they were baptised. In these times, people were baptised very soon after conversion, mostly straight away.

There it is.
With Cornelius and the gentiles as well

Acts 11:11–18 (KJV 1900) — 11 And, behold, immediately there were three men already come unto the house where I was, sent from Caesarea unto me. 12 And the spirit bade me go with them, nothing doubting. Moreover these six brethren accompanied me, and we entered into the man’s house: 13 And he shewed us how he had seen an angel in his house, which stood and said unto him, Send men to Joppa, and call for Simon, whose surname is Peter; 14 Who shall tell thee words, whereby thou and all thy house shall be saved. 15 And as I began to speak, the Holy Ghost fell on them, as on us at the beginning. 16 Then remembered I the word of the Lord, how that he said, John indeed baptized with water; but ye shall be baptized with the Holy Ghost. 17 Forasmuch then as God gave them the like gift as he did unto us, who believed on the Lord Jesus Christ; what was I, that I could withstand God? 18 When they heard these things, they held their peace, and glorified God, saying, Then hath God also to the Gentiles granted repentance unto life.
 
No, I am trying to get you folks to think.

#1...Paul taught that OT Law was works....Modern Christendom teaches Acts 2:38 is works.

#2...Modern Christendom teaches thinking deeply(faith) and confessing such faith is not human work, but God doing it.

#3...many even teach repenting is a work, so repenting is not needed to be saved.

Everything they teach is self debunking with scripture, but the masses follow it like lemmings.

Why? They heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears....Happy with PARTIAL truth and a PARTIAL experience.


Truther, why did you change your picture for your posts? Instead of a snot-nosed kid, you are the man who played Peter in The Chosen. I think the first picture more accurately lines up with your messages.

Not only that but "Fellow Traveler" has chosen the same actor for a picture on his post. We're making this more confusing now.
 
Last edited:
For this "back Uphill" Word Of Truth, Rightly Divided?:

water baptism for the remission of sins is found in:

prophecy / covenants / law, for Israel - ie:

water, For remission of sins/induction into the earthly Israeli "priesthood!":​
(Matthew_3:5-6; Mark_1:4; Luke_3:3; John_1:31; Luke 7:29-30; Acts_10:37)​
(Matthew_28:19; Mark_16:16; Acts_2:38, 22:16; Ezekiel_36:25; Isaiah 52:15)​
Rightly Divided (2 Timothy 2:15 AV) From “Things That Differ!” (online):

In God's Other 'Context' of Mystery and Grace, He Now Teaches, for Induction Into
The Heavenly Body Of Christ, there is only:

One [ Spiritual ] Baptism

Praise His Holy Name!

Amen.
Have you affirmed sprinkling?

Ezekiel 36:25 (NASB 2020) — 25 Then I will sprinkle clean water on you, and you will be clean; I will cleanse you from all your filthiness and from all your idols.

Isaiah 52:15 (NASB 2020) — 15 So He will sprinkle many nations, Kings will shut their mouths on account of Him; For what they had not been told, they will see, And what they had not heard, they will understand.

baptism apart from affirmation of Christ saving?

Matt. 3:5 Then Jerusalem and all Judea and all the region about the Jordan were going out to him, 6 and they were baptized by him in the river Jordan, confessing their sins.

Mark 1:4 John appeared, baptizing in the wilderness and proclaiming a baptism of repentance for the forgiveness of sins.

Luke 3:3 And he went into all the region around the Jordan, proclaiming a baptism of repentance for the forgiveness of sins.

John 1:31 I myself did not know him, but for this purpose I came baptizing with water, that he might be revealed to Israel.”

Luke 7:29 (When all the people heard this, and the tax collectors too, they declared God just, having been baptized with the baptism of John, 30 but the Pharisees and the lawyers rejected the purpose of God for themselves, not having been baptized by him.)

Acts 10:37 you yourselves know what happened throughout all Judea, beginning from Galilee after the baptism that John proclaimed:
 
Here is the order of salvation and then baptism right here:

(Act 16:28) But Paul cried with a loud voice, saying, Do thyself no harm: for we are all here.
(Act 16:29) Then he called for a light, and sprang in, and came trembling, and fell down before Paul and Silas,
(Act 16:30) And brought them out, and said, Sirs, what must I do to be saved?
(Act 16:31) And they said, Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house.
(Act 16:32) And they spake unto him the word of the Lord, and to all that were in his house.
(Act 16:33) And he took them the same hour of the night, and washed their stripes; and was baptized, he and all his, straightway.

Saved first. And with his salvation.. the affect of his testimony leading his whole family to be saved.

Within the hour they were baptised. In these times, people were baptised very soon after conversion, mostly straight away.

There it is.
So you are saying that they were saved in verse 31, and then baptized in verse 33? That does not agree with Rom 10:13-14. Before you can be saved, you must call on the name of the Lord, and before you can call on His name you must believe, and before you can believe you must hear the Gospel. And Acts 22:16 says that we call on His name in baptism. In Acts 16:31 they had not yet heard, so they could not have believed, so they could not have called on His name, so they could not be saved yet. They were saved when, after hearing the Word and then believing it, they called on the Lord's name in baptism and were saved.
 
Truther, why did you change your picture for your posts? Instead of a snot-nosed kid, you are the man who played Peter in The Chosen. I think the first picture more accurately lines up with your messages.

Not only that but "Fellow Traveler" has chosen the same actor for a picture on his post. We're making this more confusing now.
I kind of like his Avatar better. Mine looks like he's thinking "Oh Brother". Truthers looks like he's thinking "Are you kidding me".
 
So you are saying that they were saved in verse 31, and then baptized in verse 33? That does not agree with Rom 10:13-14. Before you can be saved, you must call on the name of the Lord, and before you can call on His name you must believe, and before you can believe you must hear the Gospel. And Acts 22:16 says that we call on His name in baptism. In Acts 16:31 they had not yet heard, so they could not have believed, so they could not have called on His name, so they could not be saved yet. They were saved when, after hearing the Word and then believing it, they called on the Lord's name in baptism and were saved.

First point.. a mute person can't verbally call on the name of the Lord.

It's inward belief, not the outward mouth moving.

The calling is expressing inner belief. They don't HAVE to verbally express.

Go thru the book of John and compare with Acts and Romans 10.
 
Back
Top Bottom