God requires man to HUMBLE THEMSELVES

First that does not speak of all things

second that is inspiration not compatibilism

Using your methodology, taking dictation would be compatibilism

It isn't
If it's of God you would be correct.

So is the Bible God's word or Paul's word? God's

Does God determine the content of His word, yup.

Did Paul, and the others, write down exactly what God would have them write down? Yup

Did Paul and the others do so freely, without force or coercion? Yup

COMPATIBILISM 101
 
If it's of God you would be correct.

So is the Bible God's word or Paul's word? God's

Does God determine the content of His word, yup.

Did Paul, and the others, write down exactly what God would have them write down? Yup

Did Paul and the others do so freely, without force or coercion? Yup

COMPATIBILISM 101
Nope

First that does not speak of all things

you did not address this

second that is still inspiration not compatibilism

Using your methodology, taking dictation would be compatibilism

A secretary writes down exactly what the boss dictated

She does so freely and the content is controlled

It would be special pleading to argue it holds true when God is dictating but not when man is
 
Nope

First that does not speak of all things

you did not address this

second that is still inspiration not compatibilism

Using your methodology, taking dictation would be compatibilism

A secretary writes down exactly what the boss dictated

She does so freely and the content is controlled

It would be special pleading to argue it holds true when God is dictating but not when man is
It does speak of all of scripture. All scripture is "God breathed".You say compatibilism is not logical. I only need one example to blow that premise out of the water.

Mission accomplished

The secretary analogy only makes my point. Thanks.


COMPATIBILISM 101
 
It does speak of all of scripture. All scripture is "God breathed".You say compatibilism is not logical. I only need one example to blow that premise out of the water.

Mission accomplished

The secretary analogy only makes my point. Thanks.


COMPATIBILISM 101
All things

It is quite irrational to argue concerning all things what you imagine of one thing

You still fail to address the issue

and you flubbed the secretary issue

Using your methodology, taking dictation would be compatibilism

A secretary writes down exactly what the boss dictated

She does so freely and the content is controlled

It would be special pleading to argue it holds true when God is dictating but not when man is
 
Yup. See Acts 4:27,28
How many more Crosses are there for Acts 4:27-28 to be still going on? Talk about disregarding context, calvinists continue to take the cake. :rolleyes:

What you are attempting to do is to sacrifice God's holiness on the altar of your pagan tulip god.
 
How many more Crosses are there for Acts 4:27-28 to be still going on? Talk about disregarding context, calvinists continue to take the cake. :rolleyes:

What you are attempting to do is to sacrifice God's holiness on the altar of your pagan tulip god.
This is a prime example of someone who has no arguement.

Who said it was still going on?
 
All things

It is quite irrational to argue concerning all things what you imagine of one thing

You still fail to address the issue

and you flubbed the secretary issue

Using your methodology, taking dictation would be compatibilism

A secretary writes down exactly what the boss dictated

She does so freely and the content is controlled

It would be special pleading to argue it holds true when God is dictating but not when man is
Nope. Paul did not take dictation. Analogy FAIL.

All scripture is God breathed, yet has a human authority.

Compatibilism 101
 
This is a prime example of someone who has no arguement.
Again, this is a classic example of calvinists disregarding context once more. The context is the predetermination of the Cross. Since the Cross has happened then the context of those verses is no longer in effect.
Who said it was still going on?
Thank you for confirming those verses are contextually historical and not present.

Therefore, your attempt to sacrifice God's holiness on the altar of your pagan tulip god has crashed and burned. 🔥
 
Nope. Paul did not take dictation. Analogy FAIL.

All scripture is God breathed, yet has a human authority.

Compatibilism 101
First

All things

It is quite irrational to argue concerning all things what you imagine of one thing

You still fail to address this issue

second the definition of compatibilism

Compatibilism (also known as soft determinism), is the belief that God's predetermination and meticulous providence is "compatible" with voluntary choice. In light of Scripture, human choices are believed to be exercised voluntarily but the desires and circumstances that bring about these choices about occur through divine determinism


is not inspiration

Inspiration is that influence of the Spirit of God upon the minds of the Scripture writers which made their writings the record of a progressive divine revelation, sufficient, when taken together and interpreted by the same Spirit who inspired them, to lead every honest inquirer to Christ and to salvation.

Augustus Hopkins Strong, Systematic Theology (Philadelphia: American Baptist Publication Society, 1907), 196.

which is not determinism
 
This is a prime example of someone who has no arguement.

Who said it was still going on?
Well then you cannot use one example to show all things are determined

and btw you did not show God gave them the desire to kill Christ

which would be necessary to establish compatibilism for that single example
 
Well then you cannot use one example to show all things are determined

and btw you did not show God gave them the desire to kill Christ

which would be necessary to establish compatibilism for that single example
Funny thing now that you have mentioned it-there is still a desire, globally, to do away with Christ Jesus, the cross, resurrection and the conviction of the Holy Spirit, the truth and the Scriptures.
 
Well then you cannot use one example to show all things are determined

and btw you did not show God gave them the desire to kill Christ

which would be necessary to establish compatibilism for that single example
Sure I can. And did.

God, as their creator also created who they are. Which includes their desires. You don't choose your desires.
 
Again, this is a classic example of calvinists disregarding context once more. The context is the predetermination of the Cross. Since the Cross has happened then the context of those verses is no longer in effect.

Thank you for confirming those verses are contextually historical and not present.

Therefore, your attempt to sacrifice God's holiness on the altar of your pagan tulip god has crashed and burned. 🔥
Ya , okay. Good talk
 
Sure I can. And did.

God, as their creator also created who they are. Which includes their desires. You don't choose your desires.
That’s Calvinist creeds nowhere found in scripture just like tulip 🌷

Calvinists are just like Catholics that way. The apple 🍎 does not fall far from the tree 🌲

Both Catholics and Calvinist have the false teachings of Augustine in common.
 
That’s Calvinist creeds nowhere found in scripture just like tulip 🌷

Calvinists are just like Catholics that way. The apple 🍎 does not fall far from the tree 🌲

Both Catholics and Calvinist have the false teachings of Augustine in common.
Your much closer to Catholic theology than I am. Synergism ring a bell?
 
You’re much closer to Catholic theology than I am. Synergism ring a bell?
Nope the apple ( Calvinism ) didn’t fall far from its mother tree ( Catholic Church ) hence they tried to reform it but fell way short and held onto many of its errors.

I can see you are not a student of church history.

Do you know who st augustine was ?

Next
 
Nope the apple ( Calvinism ) didn’t fall far from its mother tree ( Catholic Church ) hence they tried to reform it but fell way short and held onto many of its errors.

I can see you are not a student of church history.

Do you know who st augustine was ?

Next
Your theology is much closer to Roman Catholicism than mine will ever be. Synergism ring a bell?
 
Back
Top Bottom