God requires man to HUMBLE THEMSELVES

Ya, it does matter. God did not change. His character and essence remained the same. As with Christ, the same yesterday, today and forever.
Again the issue is not does God change in his character or essense but does God experience change in accidental or non essentials or in his acts

You are avoiding the issue as no one argues God changes in his character or essence
 
Agreed!


We can be certain of that which is specifically stated about God. But certainty can also be inferred about other aspects, about which specific statements are not directly made by the coalition of certain specific revelations. The Trinity is one of those things! Opponents of the Trinity always point to the absence of the specific word in scripture to which we reply that the scriptures call each member of the Godhead is directly called God!

God existing outside of time is inferred by his being existent prior to the creation event. Time is a part of temporal reality, part of the creation event.
Doug

That begs the question. You have to begin with the assumption time was created

On the other hand all change is considered as involving time

Going from non creation to creation involves sequential action and a past




See above.


Time is not an attribute of God. Attributes are the qualities of God. Time is not a quality.

This is a list of the Attributes of God:

1. God Is a Personal Spirit
2. God Is All-Powerful
3. God Is Present Everywhere
4. God Knows Everything
5. God Is Sovereign
6. God Is Holy
7. God Is Absolute Truth
8. God Is Righteous
9. God Is Just
10. God Is Love
11. God Is Merciful
12. God Is Faithful
13. God Never Changes


Time is not listed as an Attribute.

Doug
Who was God sovereign over before creation?

God in his essence or character never changes, but he experiences change in his relations or accidental properties

He went from not being a creator to being a creator
 
Yes just another contradiction in his theology
Cambridge changes refer to a specific type of change in an individual’s properties or characteristics, where a predicate (a statement or description) that was true of them at one point in time becomes false at a later point in time, not due to any change in their intrinsic properties, but rather due to a change in the extrinsic or relational properties.

The Simplicity of God in the classic theory denies God can have these
 
Acts in time but exists outside of time.

Time is not a attribute of God. It's part of the created order.
That would be an assumption nowhere stated in the bible

Did God not act in sequence in creation and was not the creation a past act and a change
 
Can you deal with the fact God is omniscient? And that Open Theism is heresy?
Yes I affirm omniscience

Can you deal with the fact God was free to create or not create

As a result the future was open at that time.

And it's your fatalism that is the heresy.
 
Again, we are incapable of understanding things from God’s perspective or what it is like to be God.
Sure on a great many things. I think our spirits capture some aspects of it when you think of a parent/offspring relationship like the story of the Prodigal Son. The Father's heart loved his offspring with unconditional love. God the Father and human Fathers (and mothers) share the same longing and love towards their kids.
But I would ask you what makes something certain in your mind, even though it is something not yet experienced? Would I be able to explain that process about your certainty?
I think you could for it would be based on how overwhelming the evidence would be for me to be so certain of something.
I would only say that the fact that God declares that X will happen in the future necessitates that he is certain about it!
How he comes to that certainty is irrelevant to my thinking.
I'm not sure that really reflects though your position in these matters. After all you don't believe in determination correct? So wouldn't it be safe to say it would be and is relevant to your thinking?
 
Doug

That begs the question. You have to begin with the assumption time was created
It is not an assumption, it is a logical inference. If there is a before creation state, and then a creation state, a before and after scenario now exists. The space created between these two states of being is time. If there is only one state of being, there can be no time.


On the other hand all change is considered as involving time

Technically, it is a before and after, but this necessitates “change”; but I rather think change is the descriptor of the state rather than a substance in itself. But this is neither here nor there in the long run.
Going from non creation to creation involves sequential action and a past
Which is why it logically indicates the beginning of time as we know it.



Who was God sovereign over before creation?
Sovereignty simply means that there is no other power greater. It is a relational designation only if there is another source of power to which it can be compared.

But even in the absence of another power source, he is still objectively the greatest power, and thus is sovereign.


God in his essence or character never changes, but he experiences change in his relations or accidental properties
A God who is truly one, means that there is no variation within the members of the whole. Omniscience necessitates that all knowledge is always known.

I cannot explain this reality, for God is not a man, and his capacities are beyond full human comprehension. This is not an appeal to mystery, but an acknowledgement that God is necessarily beyond my comprehension .

He went from not being a creator to being a creator
Which is the first act outside of himself. All other “acts” prior to creation were internal and thus simultaneous for all involved. There is no before and after to the members of the Godhead.

Doug
 
It is not an assumption, it is a logical inference. If there is a before creation state, and then a creation state, a before and after scenario now exists. The space created between these two states of being is time. If there is only one state of being, there can be no time.


Inference is another word for assumption. The bible never states God is timeless, static and non sequential.

Regarding your argument, a timeless God can have no before or after state.

that indicates sequence and change and thus indicates time as most believe





Sovereignty simply means that there is no other power greater. It is a relational designation only if there is another source of power to which it can be compared.
I disagree. Without creation there was nothing to be sovereign over. Sovereignty would then be an accidental attribute
 
Sure on a great many things. I think our spirits capture some aspects of it when you think of a parent/offspring relationship like the story of the Prodigal Son. The Father's heart loved his offspring with unconditional love. God the Father and human Fathers (and mothers) share the same longing and love towards their kids.
I agree.


I think you could for it would be based on how overwhelming the evidence would be for me to be so certain of something.
But why does the same evidence not convince some?


I'm not sure that really reflects though your position in these matters. After all you don't believe in determination correct? So wouldn't it be safe to say it would be and is relevant to your thinking?
Let me recapitulate: That God declares that X will happen in the future, necessitates that he is certain regarding that fact.

This is not about how he knows that X will happen in the future, but that he is certain about its future reality to us. The means of X happening is not relevant to the fact that he is certain about it.


Doug
 
Inference is another word for assumption.
Any dictionary will disagree with you: an inference is a logical deduction drawn from a premise or information previously established as true.

Assumption is a conclusion without supporting evidence as to its validity.

The bible never states God is timeless, static and non sequential.
1) You can’t make a positive argument from a negative.

2) You cannot make an argument from a lack of information.

3) God’s very name, I am what I am indicates a static nature of being.

4) In and of himself, God, as the unity of the Trinity, simply is! There is no need of interaction, for they simply know. We cannot describe this union with our abilities, words, or comprehension.

Doug
 
Not in God it wasn't.

Nope. Do you age in heaven?
Well of course since there is time. :)

I have demonstrated time exists in heaven bit of course your presuppositions will deny the biblical truth I have shown about heaven. I have provided several passages in heaven that prove you are wrong and your continual skeptical questions do not change the facts. :)

hope this helps !!!
 
Well of course since there is time. :)

I have demonstrated time exists in heaven bit of course your presuppositions will deny the biblical truth I have shown about heaven. I have provided several passages in heaven that prove you are wrong and your continual skeptical questions do not change the facts. :)

hope this helps !!!
So you do age in heaven? Yet you remain the same?

Notice the Bible says there will be no more Sun, Moon or stars which is how we tell time no?
 
Back
Top Bottom