It that is the meaning of fulfilled, then there is no “only in part”; my definition is either correct or incorrect! We both say it is correct, so leave it at that.
Each member of the Trinity had a Ministry to perform towards the redemption of Yahweh's covenant people Israel. It was the Father's Plan, the Son implemented the Plan, and the Holy Spirit is in the world today to apply the Plan to God's elect Israel.
What I mean "in part" is that up to that point Jesus fulfilled covenant and prophecy but there is still prophecy He still needs to fulfill that is still yet future. Jesus hasn't fulfilled all prophecy which is the meaning of "in part."
Jesus still needs to fulfill other aspects of the three covenants God made with Israel. The Ceremonial and Moral Laws have been fulfilled. The Social Laws still need to be fulfilled and will be when Jesus gives the kingdom back to His Father and all things have and will be fulfilled at that time. Until then not even Jesus sitting and reigning on His throne is fulfilling all things. It all ends with the giving up the kingdom back to the Father and everything is "all in all."
First of all, are you genetically Jewish? I am genetically not Jewish, and thus am genetically Gentile, but this doesn’t necessarily skew my ability to comprehend something from another perspective.
Do you REALLY know that for sure? That you're not Hebrew? Do you really think you do not have any Abraham's DNA in you?
As a people the Hebrews have been scattered to the four winds three times. The northern kingdom in 722 BC by the Assyrians, the southern kingdom in AD 586 by the Babylonians, and the twelve tribes in AD 70 by the Romans. These were all divine acts of God.
When Cyrus gave the Hebrews permission to return to their land only a remnant returned. while the majority of Hebrews/Jews remained in Gentile lands. A conservative number to define "remnant" can be about 10% of total. Maybe 15% of the total. Think about that. 85-90% of Hebrews remained in Gentile lands. I'm sure that after the destruction of their First Temple and a generation later Hebrews strayed far from their religion and became diluted by Assyrian, Babylonian, and Hellenized culture and lost the knowledge of their religion and Torah and their prophets.
For the following you should consult Hebrew/Jewish accounts since they were more adept at record-keeping of their own people and history. You will not get an accurate rendering of the Hebrew/Jewish history from Gentile sources.
There is something called "the lost ten tribes of Israel (northern kingdom)" but they were not lost. There are Scriptures that record which tribes returned to Israel or to areas near the previous borders called Israel. Remember, if you know, Samaria was the capital of the northern kingdom. Under judgment from God the ten tribes of the north were taken captive and assimilated into Assyrian culture. Some may have escaped. And some remained behind. Through rape, inter-marriage, slavery, concubinage, and other factors Jewish women (and men) definitely had offspring with Gentiles even to survive and for many reasons. This is from where we get "Samaritans" who although were half-Jew and half-Gentile were still IN COVENANT with God. I think the Samaritans lay the groundwork for the 'dilution' of the Jewish race with Gentiles and who knows where these offspring traveled let alone lived. Some may have gone into Africa, and southern Europe, etc. Even in the Caucus area. Asia. All over.
The southern kingdom lasted much longer. Around 622 BC the Book of the Law was found by some priest and when king Josiah read it, he learned how far this people had strayed from God's commands (2 Kings 22.) Josiah was profoundly affected, and this led to reforms throughout the kingdom.
In 539 BC the Babylonians conquered the southern kingdom, took captives, and again the Jews were scattered throughout the earth. Around 537-38 BC Cyrus allowed Jew to return to rebuild their city (Temple.) This was around the time Pharisees and Sadducees were formed with Pharisees being the original group to be formed. This all leads to the time of Jesus' birth and His eventual ministry to the Hebrew people. Later, through the Jewish Wars with Rome (Josephus, etc.) Israel of twelve tribes was defeated and forced out of their land with Rome passing laws prohibiting their return until Rome was eventually defeated and destroyed by the barbarians in AD 410. By this time Gentile Christianity, which was NOT true, Biblical Christianity was in full swing and the reason why it was NOT true, Biblical Christianity was because of their hatred of the Jews and their interpretation of the destruction of the Second Jewish Temple specifically and the Jewish cities and nation in general. Gentiles saw these events as God's judgment of the Jews and that in their minds Gentiles were seen to be the replacement of Israel in God's redemptive history. Gentiles early in the second century unmoored Gentile Christianity from its Hebrew roots and in this created a new religion. There were no Hebrew Scriptures and no Jew to interpret or teach Hebrew history and culture to them, so they misunderstood a great deal regarding what true, Biblical Christianity was, and true, Biblical Christianity was the faith and religion of the Hebrews/Jewish people. It was NEVER Gentile in nature. But Gentiles stole Israel's inheritance and as soon as the gathering of scrolls led to a New Testament Gentiles re-interpreted these Jewish writings with a Gentile mindset.
Although America and Britain are not named in prophecy, both are in a loose fashion. Britain's coat of arms has a lion and a unicorn and Hebrew writing. Lion (from the tribe of Judah), and unicorn (Ephraim). Our dollar bill has the Magen David (six-pointed star), thirteen stars, stripes, Olive leaves in the Great Seal, etc. corresponding to the 13 tribes of Israel. It gets complicated but after two world wars America and Britain became victorious and leaders of the free world. People from the Old World came across the ocean for religious freedoms and during the Revolutionary War it was ONE JEW who bankrolled the American Revolution and the effort to overcome Britain and become a free nation. So, having said all that I say this: NO ONE knows for sure that through all this scattering of the Jewish people these past 1700 years whether or not a presumed Gentiles does not have Hebrew DNA in their family line somewhere. And, given that God is a God of Covenant and KEEPS His Promises to Abraham and his seed that those Gentiles who see themselves as Gentile and are born again just may have Hebrew/Abraham's DNA in their family line. If a presumed Gentile has 00.01% Hebrew DNA, God is a God of Covenant will save His people. Even though Esau and Jacob were both seed of Abraham it was Jacob through whom the Promise went through, but Esau was also blessed of God being seed of Abraham. Ishmael's and Esau's descendants are the "nations" and "kings" God referred to in the Abrahamic Covenant of Genesis 15 and 17 for Gentiles do not come from the loins of Abraham. But later on, Jews and Gentiles (non-Jews) did intermingle and here we are in 2024 on the precipice of a new round of judgment upon God's covenant people but this time in the lands of America and UK while God deals directly with the two southern tribes that occupy the land of Israel today with a smattering of the northern ten tribes existing there today. There is much history to consider when trying to understand God's Redemptive history of His covenant people Israel.
Did you know that it was mainly the tribe of Judah and Benjamin that were involved in the creation of the state of Israel in 1948? Each tribe had its own banner, stone, colors, ensign, etc., and the funny thing is that when it came time to name their nation the tribe of Judah chose the name of the northern tribe: Israel.
The Jewish flag also almost had a Lion (from the tribe of Judah) but instead opted for a six-pointed star as its emblem - the Magen David. THAT'S WHY I post the things I do because I have a head start over the rest of the members here knowing these things especially that God made covenant with Abraham, the Children of Israel (Mosaic) and both Houses of Israel and Judah (New Covenant) and why I say truthfully God has made NO COVENANT with Gentiles but that through world history Gentiles have stolen Hebrew/Jewish covenants, terminology, Scripture, and their inheritance and everything Jewish and turned it into Gentile possession.
And for that God is going to finally judge Gentiles for their sins against Him and against His covenant people.
Be prepared is the ONLY warning God gives to us.
Be prepared. Judgment is coming upon the nations (Gentiles) America included.
Secondly, I strongly disagree with your statement that we “place the focus on Torah rather than on Christ”! That is absurd.
It says Christ fulfilled the Law. The focus is supposed to be Christ not the Torah, but Gentiles misunderstand what "fulfilling" means. Believe me, the Torah is NOT "obsolete" or "abolished" or "ended." Gentiles do not have the authority to tell the Jews whether or not their Torah given them of their God is "obsolete." Great arrogance in this act.
My focus is completely on and about Christ, and as you forlorn, we do not see the OT law in the same light. Though I don’t think it is true, you are saying that we “Gentiles” have thrown out the Torah, so how can we be “focused on Torah rather than on Christ”?
If your focus was on Christ, you would never say the Torah is "abolished" or "obsolete" or "ended."
God's Torah is eternal. It says so in the Bible.
The Jewish nation are chosen to be “a light for the Gentiles,” they were given the law on our behalf. They were give it to us, to expose us to it. All God’s word is meant for all men! Given to Israel, given for all men.
That prophecy will be fulfilled during the Millennium, not before.
Blameless does not mean justified! It means, in context, that Paul’s lifestyle in his pre-conversion experience was not subject to blame by the standards of the law. He kept the commands and observed the ceremonial duties prescribed by the law without fault.
Saul says he was blameless. This means "justified" whether you want to accept it or not. Saul has priors of contradicting himself in his letters IF YOU WOULD ONLY LOOK.
Secondly, Paul does not say anything contradictory, for Phil 3:6 does not say he is justified! He only says he was faultless as to keeping the law, just as the rich young ruler did, and yet Jesus said he was still lacking! (Luke 18:18-30) Paul was faultless in as far as the requirements of the law, but not before God; he kept the law, but persecuted God! If he was Justified, there would be no need to stop him on the road to Damascus.
If Paul is “doubled minded”, then you have destroyed 2/3rds of the NT. And also the credibility of others who commended Paul and his teachings, like Peter and Luke, and perhaps by extension Mark!
Doug
You figure it out. I have. But if you are wrong then you are doing injustice to Christ and to His people the Jews.
And this sin will be addressed by God and His Christ at the appropriate time.
Good luck.